Originally Posted by
eschatological
Again, no he didn't.
He charged them with Aggravated Assault, which CAN BE assault with a deadly weapon OR assault with any object that can reasonably cause serious bodily harm. He was charging them under the second half of that definition.
It's like y'all get your marching orders from the talking points issued by assholes like Matt Gaetz and then stick to them verbatim.
I've said in this thread that the pointing the taser back at the officer makes the shoot 50/50 in my mind. Since then, the DA has asserted that A) the taser was depleted, and B) that the officer knew that. If those are both true - then the case clearly falls into the territory of a bad shoot for me. That's up to the DA to prove at trial.
It's not that tasers aren't justification for deadly force - it's that the DA is asserting that the officer KNEW the taser was empty and shot the guy running away anyways.
- - - Updated - - -
And there's the racist dog whistle. Studies have shown that blacks commit crimes at a rate about equal to whites. They make up such a large (unjustified) portion of the crimes because they are over-policed, over arrested, more likely to have force used against them during an arrest, over indicted, over charged, over convicted, and over sentenced.