Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ...
2
3
4
5
6
... LastLast
  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by MoanaLisa View Post
    Developers say it's core to the game.
    See this is the response I was looking for because I also agree that would be the card developers would pull to justify continuing the faction war. But they can keep the "war in Warcraft" and have peace between the Horde and Alliance. With the war ended, there would be no need for "war mode" anymore. That said, we can't remove a core aspect of WoW that has been around since its incarnation, that being world pvp. So instead, why not introduce two new factions? 'The Rebellion' and 'The Resistance', one for the Horde and the other for the Alliance.

    Two groups formed out of their hatred for Horde/Alliance that oppose the peace between the two factions. Instead of enabling war mode, by enabling "Join the Rebellion!" or "Join the Resistance!" you go from Hostile to Exalted (reputation serves no purpose other than lore), become hostile to "opposing" faction players, and can interact with NPCs of your faction in their respective hubs that are now the locations you use to purchase PvP gear, pick up CTA quests, and redeem your weekly chest.

    This simply becomes the new PvP mode and operates almost exactly like war mode. You're undercover of course, so the Horde/Alliance are none the wiser to your activities outside of major cities, but you may get a whisper from time to time from loyalists who give you their support.

    The Horde/Alliance know of these factions of course, but do not cast blame upon each other for they expected rebellion. Perhaps certain events could occur in which the Horde/Alliance try to stop you, acting as new warfront or bounty quest lore.

    Anyway, just a thought.

  2. #62
    Alotta interesting thoughts on this topic, and I can see some for some against and some argueing the devs have said its a core feature of wow.

    Heres my take on the faction war personally.

    Do I like the concept of two armies fighting each other over land/resources and moral dilemma's, yes.

    Do I think blizzards writing team and design team has really succeeded in achieving this in the past or present, possibly.

    Id say MoP was the only real time the Faction War actually worked. The Honor/No Honor story of BFA was a bit too one sided and didnt really show what the Alliance was like during this dilemma enough. In MoP they at least showed some elements of the Alliance not being wholey "team good guy".

    The problem is that no matter how many times they seem to try this formulae they cop out, mid expansion they change the theme and 90% of the time it seems to be an over arching bigger evil (old gods twice in a row ironically) in order to resolve the matter.

    This cop out method is pretty bad story narrative for a focus that should have taken its sweet time. Id also argue that not every patch needed a raid or a dungeon, there needed to be patches that were entirley story driven content for the sake of having more narrative around the faction war, more character development storylines and cycles around that.

    They tried, Jaina definatley got the boatload of char development this expansion with chars like Baine and a few others getting some moments to shine, but the over-all problem was the war never really... happened, it started, never finished, I agree with posters on that much.

    Heres my argument as to why the faction wars demise wouldnt hurt the game at this point:

    The Faction War literally interferes with the story, some posters have also said this. It interjects any real moments that chars can grow or shine or that individual races can get storylines entirley focused on them. Example:

    When was the last time you saw a dwarfcentric story in WoW?

    When was the last time the Mulgore Tauren got major char development, beyond heritidge armor?

    Theres alotta lore and races that really need some development and love but are being neglected cause "Faction war, only thing important horde evil alliance good ruh ruh".

    Alliance needed some genuinley dark and edgy moments, and sure Tyrande/Genn might deliver them but frankly I feel like they'd be overshadowed at this point by other players. To be honest if your gonna commit, commit. Make Tyrande/Genn/Alleria/Admiral Rogers/Turalyon and Moira into some kind of uninon of more extreme elements of Alliance characters. All of them have evidently shown their willingness to take more extreme answers to problems and the Alliance needed its own Garrosh or three for a while now.

    But the Horde also needs to loose something of significant worth, the Alliance lost a capital city, and two zones, Darnassus, Teldrassil and Darkshore, the Horde lost Tristfal Glades and Undercity (The latter by its own hand).

    Really if your talking on the idea of a faction war that works and makes sense, its time the Alliance commited some serious war crimes, morally abhorent things that would force the war to come back to play. Blizzard needs some balls here and needs to stop being shy about doing some seriously dark things in wow, considering in WC3 the game was alot closer to a dark fantasy than a high fantasy based on the grim theme's of its narrative.

    But the games shift in dynamic has been too light hearted, this whole Shadowlands expansion feels as much a filler as Warlords was to Legion, it feels timed in a way thats meant to distract you from the fact BFA was just... well, a poorly written great idea.

    Again, my stance is this, if your gonna remove the faction war for good, then commit, we could get some pretty good individual character storylines, and maybe a mercenary system for world pvp representing sub factions of the groups.

    Meanwhile if your gonna focus on the faction war, then Shadowlands needs to carry on where BFA left off and 9.1 onwards should be entirley on the faction war bringing chaos to the realm of death.

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Thestrawman View Post
    It should be dead and buried but sadly it'll be trotted out again in an expansion or two after SL so the developers can "bring the war back to Warcraft"
    ITT Lore obsessed (and it's really shitty Lore too) PvE carebears who don't understand that the faction conflict is central to the game

    Factions should NEVER be removed from WoW

    If you want a game without player factions where everyone holds hands and sings kumbaya go play a different MMO
    Subtlety Rogue was an amazing, incredible, unique, and fun spec prior to Legion and BfA

    “All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.”

    ― Douglas Adams

  4. #64
    Conflict motivates characters and drives them to action.

    If we were collecting bear butts every expansion and only collecting bear butts it might get a little repetitive, so as much as people may bemoan how bored they may be of the faction conflict "right now," it's useful to keep in mind at other points in other expansions the pendulum has swung in the other direction and people have clamored for the game to "bring the war back in Warcraft."

    There are points where people will want and even *crave* for the faction conflict - it doesn't have to be now, it can be later, and it can be put on the back burner for a while until player moods simmer until they're ready to boil over and have it again. But until then, the faction conflict should always be in a state where it can be seen as available and not something pulled out of nowhere so it's nice to have little breadcrumbs that eventually signal that a faction conflict can come - and also to feed the desire for it. In stories like WoW, scarcity can breed desire - especially when in those rare moments it's done well, people will want it because they desire a quality and varied experience. And to that end, we shouldn't just sit in the faction conflict indefinitely, it needs time to breathe - but it shouldn't go away to the point where we can't expect it to come back again.

  5. #65
    The Insane Syegfryed's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Darkshore, Killing Living and Dead elves
    Posts
    19,542
    No, one shit expansion with terrible writers is not the thing to completely end something so iconic of the game who can be worked on better, as different sidequests and used as secondary plot device

    the problem is how they try to put as the main theme and failed miserably at that, Cata faction war was secondary and was pretty good, is something to be simple, about war and killing the enemy, we don't need deep meaningless moral lessons in the fantasy wargame

    you don't cut off your arm because you injured your hand, just saying
    Last edited by Syegfryed; 2020-06-06 at 08:37 AM.

  6. #66
    Definitely.

    Its boring, inconsistent and makes characters act like utter idiots.

    Blizzards writing is going downhill for years so people saying it was just one bad expansion about faction war better prepare for more disappointment.

    Don't remove PvP, just remove lore nonsense.

    In fact, they should just create one expansion without any lore at all just to be safe.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nerovar View Post
    They had no prior build-up and instead tried to leech off of already established things people are familiar with. The Scourge? Maldraxxus did that. The Lich King? The Jailer did that. Frostmourne? The Runecarver made that. Sargeras corruption by demons and everything resulting from that? Also the Jailer's plan.

  7. #67
    It's WARcraft for a reason.

  8. #68
    If both sides agreed and kicked the forsaken out that could be a start.
    "I'm Tru @ w/e I do" ~ TM

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by shoegazing View Post
    ITT Lore obsessed (and it's really shitty Lore too) PvE carebears who don't understand that the faction conflict is central to the game

    Factions should NEVER be removed from WoW

    If you want a game without player factions where everyone holds hands and sings kumbaya go play a different MMO
    Yeah, no.

    Faction has been handled so poorly that some people, like me, want it to stop. Obviously, Blizzard won't give us an interesting story or plot regarding that topic: Every faction conflict will resolve in a tie because of gameplay and symmetry, or because another existential threat has decided to join the party and everyone need to band together to vanquish it.

    Personally, I think ending the faction war would be much more interesting, since it would break that paradigm. The war could continue, but at a much smaller scale. While people at the top would sign peace treaties and trying to patch things up, small skirmishes could start at strategic locations, locals could riot or start being belligerent because they feel they're being treated unfairly compared to the other faction. Or maybe more stupid quests, like a troll settlements shooting down Wildhammers gryphon riders cause they're tired of all the bird shit they leave on the ground. I don't know. I just think it would be an interesting dynamic, that could mirror real life events (like the EU and corona debacle).

    All I know is, I'm sick of watching the Faction war tango. It's an all act. It's not real. And I hope Blizzard will move on about it.

  10. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by Eazy View Post
    It's WARcraft for a reason.
    This is still, by far, THE dumbest attempt at an argument against uniting the factions I've ever seen on these forums and it annoys me to no end that people still mindlessly parrot it.

    Did the fight against the Scourge not constitute a war?

    Did the fight against the Burning Legion not count as war?

    The Twilight's Hammer? The Old Gods? The Void Lords? Nope! It's only WarCraft if it's Alliance vs. the Horde, obviously!

    Someone better ring up Blizzard and tell them that they should have changed the name of WarCraft III to something else when they remastered it, because obviously it doesn't count as a WarCraft game when the Alliance spends more time fighting the Scourge, the Horde spends more time fighting the Sentinels, and in the end, almost everyone teams up to defend the world from the Legion!
    "Go back...I just want to go back...!"

  11. #71
    It needs to die as a central element of the story.

    World of Warcraft is the absolute worst game to do a faction war, because NOBODY WANTS TO BE ON THE LOSING SIDE and since you have people playing both sides, none of them can really "win". Can you even imagine how upset for instance Horde players would be if BfA ended with Alliance straight up winning the war?

    It would be a shitshow and that's why both times we got a "faction war expansion", it all went pretty much the same, i.e. one faction's leader was written to be a villain, so that his faction could rebel against him and thus everyone could theoretically win in the end.

    And if they do another faction war then it's going to be the same thing.
    Last edited by Sarethion; 2020-06-06 at 09:09 AM.

  12. #72
    Quote Originally Posted by WoWIsThatAPotato View Post
    Yeah, no.

    Faction has been handled so poorly that some people, like me, want it to stop. Obviously, Blizzard won't give us an interesting story or plot regarding that topic: Every faction conflict will resolve in a tie because of gameplay and symmetry, or because another existential threat has decided to join the party and everyone need to band together to vanquish it.

    Personally, I think ending the faction war would be much more interesting, since it would break that paradigm. The war could continue, but at a much smaller scale. While people at the top would sign peace treaties and trying to patch things up, small skirmishes could start at strategic locations, locals could riot or start being belligerent because they feel they're being treated unfairly compared to the other faction. Or maybe more stupid quests, like a troll settlements shooting down Wildhammers gryphon riders cause they're tired of all the bird shit they leave on the ground. I don't know. I just think it would be an interesting dynamic, that could mirror real life events (like the EU and corona debacle).

    All I know is, I'm sick of watching the Faction war tango. It's an all act. It's not real. And I hope Blizzard will move on about it.
    I will never understand why anyone cares about this game's poorly written lore. You play the game... for the story? I don't get that and I never will. I play this game to murder horde, full stop.

    Let me tell you something, there is some quality storytelling in WoW but it has nothing to do with what Tyrande or Sylvanas or any major character is up to.

    The Pamela Redpath quests in the Plaguelands? That was decent storytelling.
    Subtlety Rogue was an amazing, incredible, unique, and fun spec prior to Legion and BfA

    “All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.”

    ― Douglas Adams

  13. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainV View Post
    BFA is, for the most part universally agreed to be a pretty shallow, poorly done and heavily rushed expansion with some interesting story idea's and utterly abysmal executions of them.

    In terms of gameplay, lore, and storytelling we have all but reached a point where besides the likes of Tyrande and Genn there are no faction specific characters who have some kinda grudge against the other.

    With that in mind... is it time, to consider cross-faction and the removal of said factions, now that there is basically almost no reason at all for another war again?

    Or would you truly feel that wow needs more faction divergance still?

    What would your reasons be?

    Or do you agree with the statement, that the time has come, for factions, to die.
    This is real reason, why lore in Wow doesn't matter at all. After all that BFA faction war story Blizzard just tells us "just forget it, like nothing is happened, cuz we still need motivation for PVP and our sweet railed story with zero moral choices, so no things, like merging factions and non-linear story".

    I don't care about Wow 11.0, if it's not solo-MMO. No half-measures - just perfect xpack.

  14. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by Gaidax View Post
    Yeah, Blizz wtf why I caen't be advetururr, so what that I killed gods, titans, elemental lords and dragon aspects and am a general of my faction with a frikkin' army and naval fleet at my disposal on multiple planets?

    /rage
    Yeah.... every xpac we, generals and high ranked on our faction, have to put our hands in some creature shit to collect shitty items for a stupid leveling quest....
    What a high level duty....
    We are not done killing boars or any other animals for some xp and a green item

  15. #75
    Old God Mirishka's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Get off my lawn!
    Posts
    10,784
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptainV View Post
    BFA is, for the most part universally agreed to be a pretty shallow, poorly done and heavily rushed expansion with some interesting story idea's and utterly abysmal executions of them.

    In terms of gameplay, lore, and storytelling we have all but reached a point where besides the likes of Tyrande and Genn there are no faction specific characters who have some kinda grudge against the other.

    With that in mind... is it time, to consider cross-faction and the removal of said factions, now that there is basically almost no reason at all for another war again?

    Or would you truly feel that wow needs more faction divergance still?

    What would your reasons be?

    Or do you agree with the statement, that the time has come, for factions, to die.
    It is a dead horse that has been beaten into the ground. Leave PvP in for the people who love it but make the story about the threats we always have to come together to defeat. Because fighting Arthas, the Legion, Azshara, etc provides more than enough 'war' for the title to hold up.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Sarethion View Post
    It needs to die as a central element of the story.

    World of Warcraft is the absolute worst game to do a faction war, because NOBODY WANTS TO BE ON THE LOSING SIDE and since you have people playing both sides, none of them can really "win". Can you even imagine how upset for instance Horde players would be if BfA ended with Alliance straight up winning the war?

    It would be a shitshow and that's why both times we got a "faction war expansion", it all went pretty much the same, i.e. one faction's leader was written to be a villain, so that his faction could rebel against him and thus everyone could theoretically win in the end.

    And if they do another faction war then it's going to be the same thing.
    Nailed it. ^
    Appreciate your time with friends and family while they're here. Don't wait until they're gone to tell them what they mean to you.

  16. #76
    they shouldnt end it, they should make it better, not "alliance does something thats ignored then horde does something that starts war" AGAIN

  17. #77
    The Unstoppable Force Gaidax's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Israel
    Posts
    20,850
    Quote Originally Posted by Beuargh View Post
    Yeah.... every xpac we, generals and high ranked on our faction, have to put our hands in some creature shit to collect shitty items for a stupid leveling quest....
    What a high level duty....
    We are not done killing boars or any other animals for some xp and a green item
    That's because it's what plebs want.

    I, personally, want to be a big dick general that tells people what to do while I sit on a throne in the castle playing with mog harem and executing the filthy Horde scum who dare to resist. Once in a while I'd take my sword and go down to business against some real threat that my stupid, incompetent and disappointing minions fail to dispatch, lop its head/eyeball/tentacleface off, get my fresh slutmog pieces and go back on the throne.

    Full style Dragon Age: Inquisition WoW edition, I say.

    Digging in shit for 8/8 seeds or whatever? Send that punk Wyrmbane to do that, I'm not anyone's bitch, yo!

  18. #78
    Quote Originally Posted by RadasNoir View Post
    This is still, by far, THE dumbest attempt at an argument against uniting the factions I've ever seen on these forums and it annoys me to no end that people still mindlessly parrot it.
    Woah, that's harsh!

    Quote Originally Posted by RadasNoir View Post
    Did the fight against the Scourge not constitute a war?
    Horde still fought with Alliance(WG?).

    Quote Originally Posted by RadasNoir View Post
    Did the fight against the Burning Legion not count as war?
    Ashran in WOD?

    Quote Originally Posted by RadasNoir View Post
    The Twilight's Hammer? The Old Gods? The Void Lords?
    Wouldn't call them war, more like epic fights.

    Quote Originally Posted by RadasNoir View Post
    It's only WarCraft if it's Alliance vs. the Horde, obviously!
    Yes, that makes sense actually.

    Quote Originally Posted by RadasNoir View Post
    Someone better ring up Blizzard and tell them that they should have changed the name of WarCraft III to something else when they remastered it, because obviously it doesn't count as a WarCraft game when the Alliance spends more time fighting the Scourge, the Horde spends more time fighting the Sentinels, and in the end, almost everyone teams up to defend the world from the Legion!
    xD

    It was a war between 4 playable races and almost every race fought with other one.
    That argument is even more stupid than the one I provided.

  19. #79
    Quote Originally Posted by Eazy View Post
    It was a war between 4 playable races and almost every race fought with other one.
    Yup, a war between four races. Not just the two factions you, and those like you, are obsessed with. And it was still a war whenever any of those races allied to take on a greater threat.

    Just like it was still a war when elements of the Alliance and Horde allied to take on the Scourge.

    Just like it was still a war when elements of the Alliance and Horde allied to take on the Legion.

    Just like there would still be war if the Alliance and Horde permanently allied, in order to take on the Old Gods, or the Void Lords, or whomever else Blizzard pulls out of their butt.
    "Go back...I just want to go back...!"

  20. #80
    Epic! Pheraz's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Feralas, Mount Hyal, Quel'Danil Lodge
    Posts
    1,672
    I think factions as a concept are good. My problem is rather WHO is IN those factions.
    Especially the horde makes absolutely no sense at all.
    They just made a big hodgepodge after WC3 and put everything in the horde that is not "rightful good".
    On the other side night elves in the alliance also make not so much sense.

    So again, I ilke the idea of some factions but I don't like the current factions, especially because the other races are always "thematically overpainted" by the humans and orcs themes
    Zorn | Vynd | Pheraz | Sylwina | Mondlicht | Eis | Blut | Emerelle - Plus 20 more...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •