View Poll Results: What do you think?

Voters
350. You may not vote on this poll
  • Change it! Remove the 5% damage debuff so it isn't required in PvE but is cool for PvP.

    136 38.86%
  • Change it! Make it deal damage so it feels better, the same treatment as Blade Flurry.

    11 3.14%
  • Change it! Give it a raid debuff of some kind.

    21 6.00%
  • Change it! Take it off the GCD.

    104 29.71%
  • Change it! In some other way, I'll post my idea below.

    17 4.86%
  • Keep it! (I play Classic exclusively.)

    3 0.86%
  • Keep it! (I play both Live and Classic.)

    19 5.43%
  • Keep it! (I do not play Classic.)

    23 6.57%
  • I don't care one way or the other!

    16 4.57%
Page 10 of 11 FirstFirst ...
8
9
10
11
LastLast
  1. #181
    They wanted it to be an unprune; applying automatically wouldn't fit that. The solution they came to is the same one that the majority hunters wanted, per my poll on these forums. They listened to our feedback.

    Which is still kinda shocking to me, a day later.

  2. #182
    it's gone. IT'S GONE!! THE 5% damage is GONE!!
    "You know you that bitch when you cause all this conversation."

  3. #183
    I know it's basically a pointless thought now after it's gone (still getting goosebumps just thinking about it, I'm getting hyped just because of that, lol):

    If Hunter's Mark did damage on application, it would mean you could put characters into combat at 100 yards.
    That would've been so funny. Imagine one shotting low levels from 100 yards away.

  4. #184
    Quote Originally Posted by Kithelle View Post
    Should just be some ability for each spec that applies it automatically like there used to be, instead the devs just copied and pasted from classic
    Please don't wish for Cata designs to come back. They removed auto HM on arcane shot (iirc it was arcane) because of the useless server side spam it caused, and just baked the damage in.

    I'd still like to see it as some kind of priority target button, maybe with a decent cooldown. The problem is, HM works great in Classic, because it's not completely AoE happy. You prioritize targets one by one and burn them down, AoE is for packs that are individually trivial but dangerous in numbers. In retail, AoE is completely bonkers.
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex86el View Post
    "Orc want, orc take." and "Orc dissagrees, orc kill you to win argument."
    Why no, people don't just like Sylvie for T&A: https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...ery-Cinematic/

  5. #185
    Elemental Lord Kithelle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Somewhere where canon still exists
    Posts
    8,281
    Quote Originally Posted by Schizoide View Post
    They wanted it to be an unprune; applying automatically wouldn't fit that. The solution they came to is the same one that the majority hunters wanted, per my poll on these forums. They listened to our feedback.

    Which is still kinda shocking to me, a day later.
    So basically now it's a almost useless button in a sea of useless buttons they readded in SL....they may as well just delete it again.

    More time wasted by the devs because they can't get anything to work well
    #WithoutRespectWeReject

  6. #186
    Guys, cheers!

  7. #187
    Quote Originally Posted by F Rm View Post
    Yep. Finally we won!!
    Yeah we "won", and our prize was a 5% damage nerf.

  8. #188
    Quote Originally Posted by Kithelle View Post
    So basically now it's a almost useless button in a sea of useless buttons they readded in SL....they may as well just delete it again.

    More time wasted by the devs because they can't get anything to work well
    "useless"

    PvP says hi.
    www.twitch.tv/aurakol

    I do not stream seriously or regularly

  9. #189
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkke View Post
    Yeah we "won", and our prize was a 5% damage nerf.
    Hunter ST DPS will be balanced without HM now. Don't freak out.

  10. #190
    Quote Originally Posted by Schizoide View Post
    Hunter ST DPS will be balanced without HM now. Don't freak out.
    I hope so, but don't mind me if I don't hold my breath for it.

  11. #191
    Warchief shade3891's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,094
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkke View Post
    Yeah we "won", and our prize was a 5% damage nerf.
    I'm very very happy the mandatory GCD per target is gone!!! Really really hated it. And Blizzard will rebalance the DPS without it no doubt.

  12. #192
    Quote Originally Posted by Schizoide View Post
    Hunter ST DPS will be balanced without HM now. Don't freak out.
    Honestly I don't think I even care at this point. The certainty of being 5% weaker in ST is better than constantly feeling like you are playing the spec wrong by not reapplying HM optimally.
    The world revamp dream will never die!

  13. #193

  14. #194
    Elemental Lord Kithelle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Somewhere where canon still exists
    Posts
    8,281
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurve1776 View Post
    "useless"

    PvP says hi.
    Oh yeah....useful against two classes, one of which if they know what they're doing they will dispel it before they stealth.
    #WithoutRespectWeReject

  15. #195
    The faith that Blizz will balance anything in the face of evidence to the contrary going back over a decade is absolutely adorable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex86el View Post
    "Orc want, orc take." and "Orc dissagrees, orc kill you to win argument."
    Why no, people don't just like Sylvie for T&A: https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...ery-Cinematic/

  16. #196
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkke View Post
    I hope so, but don't mind me if I don't hold my breath for it.
    It should probably be phrased as: "Now they won't nerf MM as hard as they would have otherwise".

    Because obviously we're not going to be compensated for a 5% nerf when MM was on the OP side of the charts already.

  17. #197
    Quote Originally Posted by Kurve1776 View Post
    "useless"

    PvP says hi.
    That's some Fox News level of quoting there. He actually said "almost useless".

  18. #198
    Quote Originally Posted by Kithelle View Post
    So basically now it's a almost useless button in a sea of useless buttons they readded in SL....they may as well just delete it again.

    More time wasted by the devs because they can't get anything to work well
    How much time you think they "wasted" on this?

    Do you think they held a priority meeting on Eye of the Beast, so that it doesn't become "OP" or some shit?

  19. #199
    Elemental Lord Kithelle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Somewhere where canon still exists
    Posts
    8,281
    Quote Originally Posted by KrayZ33 View Post
    How much time you think they "wasted" on this?

    Do you think they held a priority meeting on Eye of the Beast, so that it doesn't become "OP" or some shit?
    They wasted enough time on it to go back and forth to look for a way to make it work to only to give up, just like they did with searing totem.
    #WithoutRespectWeReject

  20. #200
    I'm not a fan of the unpruning. I like things the way they are now so I'm glad to see that they removed the damage component of it so I don't have to worry about always applying it. I don't do PvP so I'll probably never use it.
    Desktop ------------------------------- Laptop- Acer Nitro 5
    AMD FX-6300 CPU ----------------------AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with Vega 8 graphics
    AMD RX470 GPU ------------------------AMD Radeon RX 560X discrete graphics
    16gb RAM --------------------------------16 GB DDR4 RAM
    1 TB Samsung 860 QVO SSD ----------1 TB Crucial MX500 SSD

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •