Page 10 of 12 FirstFirst ...
8
9
10
11
12
LastLast
  1. #181
    The price they're buying for is incredibly huge.. I just don't understand.
    Disney bought Lucasfilms for $4b in 2012. If you think about how big of a franchise Star Wars is.

    What are Microsoft up too? I feel like a lot of that money was wasted

  2. #182
    Quote Originally Posted by Zakaryy View Post
    The price they're buying for is incredibly huge.. I just don't understand.
    Disney bought Lucasfilms for $4b in 2012. If you think about how big of a franchise Star Wars is.

    What are Microsoft up too? I feel like a lot of that money was wasted
    Isn't it obvious at this point? the whole reason they are buying these mega publishers is because they want to have bigger competitor's at the middle of this next gen against sony. They already know at the start sony has already won it, so by doing this strategy. They have the really big names that even sony will have to really up their game to still keep winning against.

  3. #183
    Quote Originally Posted by Izzyfurious View Post
    Isn't it obvious at this point? the whole reason they are buying these mega publishers is because they want to have bigger competitor's at the middle of this next gen. They already know at the start sony has already won it, so by doing this strategy. They have the big names that even sony will have to really up their game to still keep winning.
    And Bethesda/Zenimax are gonna help put them on top of Sony and other competitors? I don't think

    There's nothing obvious about this. With the price they paid, they could've bought out more publishers. If this is futureproofing for them, it's gonna take years for any kind of effect.

  4. #184
    Quote Originally Posted by Zakaryy View Post
    And Bethesda/Zenimax are gonna help put them on top of Sony and other competitors? I don't think

    There's nothing obvious about this. With the price they paid, they could've bought out more publishers. If this is futureproofing for them, it's gonna take years for any kind of effect.
    Yeah they won't help them, but microsoft thinks otherwise. Hence they baught them. Thats the point, those of us who believes MS will just get blown out of the water even with these acquisitions. MS wants to prove our cynicalness wrong. Thus my point.

  5. #185
    It's a win for me honestly, I usually only play single player games once except for under very certain circumstances, so having bethesda games on gamepass is awesome :P

  6. #186
    I feel like Microsoft has been fairly consumer friendly in recent years, so I'm looking forward to what they'll do with the Bethesda IPs. Hopefully they'll prevent shitty stuff like Fallout76, Wolfenstein Youngblood etc. And even if we do get timed exclusivity for some of their releases, I feel like that'll primarily be targeted at Sony, so I'm confident that it won't affect PC gaming anyway.

    Also tremendously increases the value of the Xbox game pass imo, and it was already looking like a fairly good deal with game streaming included for $15 a month.
    Quote Originally Posted by AZSolii View Post
    "yes, let's piss him off because he loves his long hair. Let us twirl our evil mustaches amidst the background music of honky-tonk pianos! GENIUS!"
    Quote Originally Posted by Culexus View Post
    Yes i hate those sneaky account thieves that come to my house and steal my computer in order to steal some wow money! Those bastards! *shakes fist*

  7. #187
    Quote Originally Posted by Izzyfurious View Post
    Yeah they won't help them, but microsoft thinks otherwise. Hence they baught them. Thats the point, those of us who believes MS will just get blown out of the water even with these acquisitions. MS wants to prove our cynicalness wrong. Thus my point.
    You're not really understanding the implications of a service like Gamepass. They have 15m subscribers right now... Before the Zenimax announcement.

    Each of those subscribers are paying a minimum of $10/month. Some are paying $15/month.

    Eventually the 23 studios they have will be producing a steady stream of high quality content that will go on GamePass. Subscriber growth is going to skyrocket (it's already started with 50% growth in 5 months). They're betting they can capture an even larger segment than their ~30m XBL gold subscriptions via game pass by being a Netflix type service. Think of how much cash they'll be making per month with 40-50m subscribers?

  8. #188
    Quote Originally Posted by Kallisto View Post
    Todd doesn't sell anything. He's in a third tier company with those above him telling him what to make and how fast to make it.
    Everyone knows it was sold because Todd showed up to the door of Bill Gates and made him buy it along with two copies of Skyrim: Special Edition. In fact, statistics show that 43% of all skyrim sales post-launch were made by Todd breaking into people's houses, stealing 30 bucks, and then leave another copy of the game on their kitchen counter.

  9. #189
    The Lightbringer zEmini's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    3,587
    I know personally that the Doom Franchise will be on every platform possible. That is a big part of Id's philosophy and no buy out will change that.

  10. #190
    Quote Originally Posted by Zakaryy View Post
    The price they're buying for is incredibly huge.. I just don't understand.
    Disney bought Lucasfilms for $4b in 2012. If you think about how big of a franchise Star Wars is.

    What are Microsoft up too? I feel like a lot of that money was wasted
    Minecraft was a $2B acquisition, for context.

    Bethesda is huge. It's not just the games, which make absurd amounts of money (IIRC Skyrim alone is well over $1B in revenue for the game itself, which it reached in 2016), but for the IP's and the related merchandising etc. They own some of the biggest IP's in gaming now - Elder Scrolls, Doom, Fallout, Wolfenstein - those are all their babies now. That's huge potential for everything from games to movies/shows to more toys and clothing etc. etc. etc.

    Acquisitions are long-term deals, and they're very likely not expecting to recoup the costs and start making money any time in the near future.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by zEmini View Post
    I know personally that the Doom Franchise will be on every platform possible. That is a big part of Id's philosophy and no buy out will change that.
    We hope. id's philosophy doesn't matter to its new owners if they don't care for it. If they dictate that a new Doom is Xbox exclusive or that it will be a timed exclusive/have exclusive content, id's gonna do it.

    I doubt it'll happen immediately to avoid backlash, especially since there's likely no Doom game coming for a while given the recent release of Eternal.

  11. #191
    The Lightbringer Clone's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Kamino
    Posts
    3,037
    Would this force Sony to do more PC releases to be more competitive? If so I'd consider this a good thing.

  12. #192
    It's like you guys keep forgetting this is Microsoft we are talking about. They can play the long term game better than anyone else thanks to all that money they have.

  13. #193
    Quote Originally Posted by iosdeveloper View Post
    you guys talk about exclusivity, when it's a matter of propaganda
    corporation buys out a lot of beloved titles to force their techno-lord agenda
    Could someone translate this?
    The wise wolf who's pride is her wisdom isn't so sharp as drunk.

  14. #194
    To put this into perspective - This is Microsoft's first party studio lineup now


  15. #195
    Banned Strawberry's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Sweden/Yugoslavia
    Posts
    3,752
    Microsoft most likely did this because their Xbox exclusives are not as good and popular as Sony PS.
    Now, Microsoft did say that they will honor the currently planned Playstation exclusives but in the future, it will be on game to game basis.
    Expect Fallout and Elder Scrolls to come only on Xbox and PC, haha.
    As a PC gamer who also is going to own PS5, this does not bother me much, but it gotta suck if you're a fan of those games and game exclusively on PS5 (no one here most likely).

  16. #196
    Quote Originally Posted by Serpha View Post
    Entire paragraph can summarise your response but the bolded part is just pure gold and proves my point.
    Users don't have responsibility on it. There are multiple reasons why games don't run that well in Linux.

    Users not playing games that crash every minute, with low fps or that don't start at all isn't a valid reason.

    It's not as simple as Linux becoming better at running the games either. It's actually mostly the games not being optimized for it.

    A gamer doesn't want to protest by having a bad experience while playing a game after work. He wants to play the fucking game hassle free.

  17. #197
    Quote Originally Posted by kaelleria View Post
    Straight up cash. They had $136b cash on hand in June. They could do this a few more times if they so desired.
    Powered by Azure o.o Jesus. To much money in the cloud and our data.
    Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/djuntas ARPG - RTS - MMO

  18. #198
    Quote Originally Posted by aceperson View Post
    i don't consider greed a good reason. exclusives are meant to drive competition to bankruptcy through a lack of support. not because their product is better. also, i'm going for a business management degree so that would explain why i phrased it so well. i know how these people think.
    I've always wondered why it's "greedy" for video game companies to have exclusives...but it's fine in every other market. People didn't call HBO "greedy" by keeping Game of Thrones as an "HBO exclusive".

  19. #199
    Quote Originally Posted by Zogarth View Post
    Just when we thought Todd couldn't find any more ways to sell Skyrim...
    Sign to Game Pass and you will be buying Skyrim again every month.

  20. #200
    Herald of the Titans Serpha's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,521
    Quote Originally Posted by tikcol View Post
    Users don't have responsibility on it. There are multiple reasons why games don't run that well in Linux.

    Users not playing games that crash every minute, with low fps or that don't start at all isn't a valid reason.

    It's not as simple as Linux becoming better at running the games either. It's actually mostly the games not being optimized for it.

    A gamer doesn't want to protest by having a bad experience while playing a game after work. He wants to play the fucking game hassle free.
    That is horseshit. You can handpick people who have problems with crashes and it's mostly AMD cards, low fps, maybe some obscure game that someone is trying to run in Wine. God forbid you run a game 19th 100 fps instead of 110. Playing hassle free? How do BSOD and Windows update self restarts and Windows deleting you files treating you? What's that? Hyperbole? Yah it goes both ways.
    Users don't have resposibility on what? Making an effort? No you don't have to, nobody is saying you have to.
    Quote Originally Posted by Venant View Post
    I think many people will agree that genocide can be justified.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •