Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ...
4
5
6
  1. #101
    Spam Assassin! MoanaLisa's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Tralfamadore
    Posts
    32,405
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaver View Post
    There is nothing wrong with the diablo game in itself but it will just always be a meme because of the hype. People were expecting diablo 4 and they got a mobile game. Therefore it will always be a meme and hopefully Blizzard see it as an example of how not to treat customers. You can also argue that they “wasted” resources on a mobile game which they could have used on the development of diablo 4.
    Blizzard needs to be in mobile. Diablo is a good IP to start with. The up or down for me will be the microtransaction model that comes with it. It's liable to be somewhat different in the West than the East. I watched about an hour of video of it when it was being introduced. The game itself looks fine. It's the extraneous stuff around it that will make or break it here. Whatever they do it will be a shot in the arm for Blizzard because of sales in the Far East. Blizzard does not really have the option any longer of ignoring what has become a huge if not dominant market for video games. They have to start releasing something. For a game studio of Blizzard's size, a new non-expansion game every decade is patently ridiculous. So expand into different markets. Stretch the already stretched-too-thin IP's a bit more.
    Last edited by MoanaLisa; 2020-11-01 at 10:59 AM.
    "...money's most powerful ability is to allow bad people to continue doing bad things at the expense of those who don't have it."

  2. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by Firebert View Post
    Eating glue is also consuming media content; doesn't make it the same.
    You are trying very hard at being purposefully unreasonable. I don't think a conversation with you is something worth having.

  3. #103
    Quote Originally Posted by Firebert View Post
    Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
    Launching but delaying the raid further would ruin overall pacing
    Then why do LFR players not get the entire raid until February?
    LFR's release is later so players who don't enjoy LFR have time to complete the raid on a difficulty more suited to them. Most guilds will be able to finish at least one difficulty in that timeframe. This avoids the situation where people who don't really want to be there otherwise want to go and see the story. This is good for LFR. You don't want those guys in there because they hate everyone in there and the difficulty itself, so they'll be super toxic.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stormbreed View Post
    Mexico is already part of the USA so is Canada
    Quote Originally Posted by Shandalar View Post
    Shadow deserves nothing, the same as Fire Mages.

  4. #104
    Quote Originally Posted by AwkwardSquirtle View Post
    LFR's release is later so players who don't enjoy LFR have time to complete the raid on a difficulty more suited to them. Most guilds will be able to finish at least one difficulty in that timeframe. This avoids the situation where people who don't really want to be there otherwise want to go and see the story. This is good for LFR. You don't want those guys in there because they hate everyone in there and the difficulty itself, so they'll be super toxic.
    I think LFR releases later so that those players don't unsubscribe ~1 month into the patch. People who actively raid/m+/PvP have reasons to stick around a few months (multiple months of subscription fees) to play with friends and progress the tier, but people who are just in it for the story would likely do it all in a week or two and then have nothing to do, so they would likely unsub til the next patch. This way they have to stick around for a few months (like the rest of the playerbase) and (I guess) have something to look forward to every few weeks.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •