Originally Posted by
Charge me Doctor
In books neither of them had any action iirc.
Tyrande was busy being a princess in distress with powerful god interventions.
Sylvanas was all about talking and doing things "off-screen", shorts like edge of night and dark mirror are mostly exposition. In tides of war and war crimes she didn't have any direct action iirc.
Then you have WC3:RoC and WC3:FT, judging by WC3:RoC Tyrande is definitely stronger, judging by WC3:FT they could be at similar power level, but Sylvanas is more about manipulation and betrayal, other than raw power, while Tyrande was acting more feisty during NE campaign... until she got kidnapped again. In WoW it's really hard to judge, since none of them were that active until recent time, and judging by cinematics and in-game progression i'd certainly vouch for Tyrande being stronger than Sylvanas in terms of raw power.
- - - Updated - - -
Don't you find it weird, that alliance have all these "super duper powerful figures", but still lose almost all engagements? Malfurion alone could stop all that Teldrassil non-sense, but for some reason he didn't.
There is no "bias" towards any side, they try to make story "balanced", which is so damn annoying, it's like writers just move forwards without considering results of previous events
- - - Updated - - -
Now go back and start counting from the start, and not from the end. You may remember characters, like, Uther, Terenas, Garithos, Daelin (Jaina's father), Antonidas, Bolvar, Benedictus, Maraad, Fandral, O'ros. Not counting "dead" characters, but "switched allegiance" - Magni, Khadgar, Malfurion, Tirion, Yrel, Kel’Thuzad, Medivh, a whole bunch of high elves.
See how easy this list is swinging from one side to another depending on when you start counting.