I am not a Blizzard employee and I won’t risk saying what the position the person who told me this has. I don’t know the name of the expansion, its announcement date or release date.
The next expansion is focused on a now actively antagonistic Elune (likely corrupted - the goal is to help fix her, not kill her) changing history in the Kaldorei Empire. This is an actual time travel expansion and is actually set in our reality, not an AU, and is planned to lead to a soft reboot of the lore. The new landmass/dimension is called Eldre’thalas (the old name for Dire Maul is being repurposed as the name for the Kaldorei Empire). It is not the entirety of Ancient Kalimdor, just a section of it. There are eight dungeons at launch, two for each zone. The first raid is the savannah capital of the anshiir (lion/cat race).
The main enemy is Elune’s Moonforged forces. Minor enemies include the Nightmare (a subsection of Elune’s forces now – Light themed), the Infinite Dragonflight, a breakaway Silithid hive and an empire of Anshiir. Main characters in this expansion that we’ve already met before are Tyrande (main timeline Tyrande is a friend while past Tyrande is an antagonist), Kaldorei Queen Azshara, Ysera, Malfurion, and Illidan.
The main city is Zin’Azshari and it is neutral to both factions. It is located at the eastern reach of the continent. Apparently none of the Legion zones are here (Suramar/Val’sharah/Azsuna) since they’d look too similar in this timeline. The few zones that we’ve seen before (Nazjatar, parts of Kalimdor) look even more different than the Draenor zones did compared to Outland.
New allied races based on extinct or critically endangered races found in the past. All of the allied races are neutral and can pick either faction. The ones I know about are dark trolls (they now look more like savage night elves with tusks), anshiir (a cat race with both ‘furry’ and humanoid versions playable - both count as the same race), titanborne (large stone people that are like bulkier vrykul) and potamu (Indian-inspired rhino-like race). There are less planned for 10.0 than were in BFA and I don’t know how many will actually be available at launch. There’s also minor new class customization in the vein of the green fire warlock stuff.
The main new advancement system is companions. You pick from one of five possible companions who you level up through different tasks and by collecting a new currency to spend on them. They each have their own skill tree which powers you up through them. They also join you in combat out in the world (NOT in instances). You have to gear your companion the same way you gear yourself. To others they appear as a no-name of the same general theme. The options are the Stormrage Brothers (as far as gear goes, they’re the same person), an honorbound exiled potamu warrior, a cured moonforged Titanborne, a highborne warlock lord, and dark troll “proto-monk.”
There are no Dragon Isles at launch, nor is there a big Light presence (outside of the Light being the likely force behind Elune’s actions).
I won’t answer any questions until after the official announcement.
with all the dragon crap people forgot about the past hype about cross faction.
It honestly sounds extremely niche and leveling companion as a system completely kills my hype. I played all expansions except for MoP and i wont play this one certainly if its legit.
But its 100% fake given the reason above.
No one in their sanity will bring on the setting vastly detached from most known plot lines, especially after Shadowlands.
Elune hype was killed by Shadowlands, Illidan and Co being reused is waste of time, and nothing in this story fits the already built up lore (Light, Void, Dragon Isles).
And allied races list outside cat people sound unispiring.
And leveling companion instead of the player character itself would trigger the fanbase in rage.
Pretty terrible and fake'ish larping.
Last edited by Harbour; 2022-01-22 at 06:49 AM.
That's kind of funny—a million and one years of folks blaming Danuser for everything bad that's ever happened, and yet it's actually Afrasiabi who was responsible for some of this if this is true. Could you give me the link for confirmation?
And, of course, not be a skeptic but I'm sure it would behoove some folks to blame Afrasiabi, so we may want to take this with a grain of salt if it was said by Danny in particular. Afrasiabi strikes me as the kind of guy to do this, and it would be a very good sign for the future of the game if it was just him, but it would also be very easy to pin every unpopular decision on the evil guy no one likes anymore.
Last edited by Le Conceptuel; 2022-01-22 at 06:50 AM.
I don't buy the Afrasiabi nonsense one bit. What vendetta and why? He's an easy name to drop because of his impropriety, but I don't think there's any real evidence a grown man would be busy caring about what a fictional character does when he was already clearly so busy harassing real women.
If there was an actual concrete reason given for that choice and what said vendetta even was, I might be able to swallow it, but Michelle Morrow is a Sylvanas stan through and through by her own admission, and I could not give any less of a fuck about what T&E say with such vague non-committals surrounding it.
Nevermind the fact that, Danuser memes aside, the entire creative process surrounding storytelling in a game as big as WoW is going to be collaborative. It required extremely talented artists, voice actors, and quest designers to create content surrounding that decision without anyone speaking up to request elaboration or point out that it may be a poor decision. This isn't something where Afrasiabi can dive at the magical keyboard and suddenly typed a paragraph about burning a tree and, whoops, sorry guys, that's the story now.
This feels like people just unwilling to accept that a character who was already poorly written and inconsistent post-Wrath just continued to fall apart and that they were cheering for garbage the whole time. The disappointment of the direction of Shadowlands is just the natural conclusion of a character the rules seldom applied to, with the soul-splitting just being a cherry on top that nobody could've predicted.
I heard of the Garrosh statement before, but - did what to his story, exactly? Garrosh's trajectory was pretty telegraphed no matter what apologists of his say. Other than the absolutely wild shift from TBC to Wrath, Stonetalon was pretty much the only (in-game) exception to the rule with his characterization, and even that was hilarious in its presentation. "You can write this shit but you can't say it" level stuff.
The logic doesn't really flow - "Someone did something to my Garrosh story, for reasons, and therefore I'm going to do something to Sylvanas and her characterization, which will harm them, somehow, for reasons. This petty vendetta will also...be the impetus for an entire expansion for a game worked on by hundreds of people. Dozens will work on this exact scene and everyone will agree it's fine."
Yeah, no. This isn't a couple of people who did separate routes in a fan-made visual novel, these are people who ostensibly worked 40-60 hour weeks with one another.
I don’t think it was as big as you think
The idea is he had the cinematic portrayed in a way to show her as a villain and had that same sentiment through her other moments
Retaliation for Garrosh being made a background character and then killed as an unrepentant asshole
I can believe it because it’s on par for people who have an inflated ego which is 90% of the WoW team
It's funny how Danuser's apologists are scapegoating Afrasiabi, even though the story is even more crappier now with Danuser in full control. And don't tell me you can't blame him. He is a LEAD narrative designer. It's like saying that the movie is shit not because of the director, but because some random gaffer didn't do his job well.
But Garrosh was a background character and killed as an asshole...after a literal public statement at BlizzCon that he wouldn't be a primary antagonist and that the plot of WoD would overtake him. As they said:
Read here. The person saying it, Dave Kosak, literally has Alex sitting to his left when he says this. Even before WoD's entire scope was stepped back due to poor reception, Grom was the intended primary antagonist, and the entire structure of Nagrand's zone story is leading to Garrosh getting absolutely bodied, so it couldn't be the work of one individual spontaneously deciding that.Now a couple things to note. So Garrosh, he’s not the main villain of this expansion, I want to make that clear. He is going to set things in motion and then they are going to spiral out of control, which is kind of awesome
A team worked on the cinematic where he was imprisoned and a team worked on the cinematic where he was bolted into oblivion. Afrasiabi can't solely make the decision for Teldrassil to occur if most of the events of the expansion's progression are structured around it and her characterization carries throughout.
This is an easy and convenient way to wave away poor writing that's existed long, long before Teldrassil because cognitive dissonance is uncomfortable.
This is precisely what I have been worried about—I would say that it may not be as difficult as you think to sabotage a storyline, though, since there can easily be ways for him to hamfist the direction of the story in his direction. It's not impossible, even if it seems improbable. He can't simply make a decision, sure, but he can find ways to kind of monopolize the whole thing.
There is also extraneous credibility granted because of Alleria's VA seemingly not having much of a reason to suggest this at all. Then, the fact that Blizzard even let her come out with this at all is odd, but I suppose they can't supervise anyone. Still, seems odd for someone to also reveal such crucial information when they're generally not irreplaceable in the corporate hierarchy.
Well if they were to keep her from saying anything then it just takes one person to say “they are still protecting the abuser they fired”
Allowing her to talk then it becomes “the company isn’t incompetent it just had a guy abusing his power but all the bad guys are gone now so the company is better and the game is being fixed”
He was the Creative Director, of course he can monopolize the whole thing.
He was also in charge during the time of Garrosh, so that's why I don't buy it's a vendetta. The simplest solution is the best one and the most likely: WoW has always coasted largely on spectacle at the expense of logic since the Wrathgate was (in my opinion, wrongfully) given positive reception. They took what worked and ran with it. Since then, every expansion begins and ends with "Wouldn't it be cool if..." moments driven entirely on shock as an increasingly unwieldy series of Red Weddings. Teldrassil was one such.
The reason I can't swallow this whole thing of Afrasiabi - bad choice of words? - is that Sylvanas' characterization is pretty enduring in the entirety of BFA. She is, as Metzen put it, "full Dick Dastardly" from basically start to finish. Almost like the character has been an increasing conga line of plot devices for drama until they hit the expansion where it was time to retire her.
Yes, this is the example of bravery I expect in disclosure when abusers have been ousted - "my favorite fictional character wasn't written well." Some real "Fight Song" level stuff there, so brave. /s
Last edited by Vakir; 2022-01-22 at 08:23 AM.