I feel like I have blue balls waiting for a potential announcement of something not yet confirmed, so I should have no reasonable expectation for any form of announcement on anything.
And yet... blue balls.
That would take weeks of their time and delay 10.0 even further. It’s beyond me how anyone can think developing 9.3 wouldn’t slow down 10.0 even more. They need less focus on Shadowlands and more on 10.0 when they are delayed so much. And that’s exactly what we get and why we only have two content patches, because they moved resources from this expansion to the next months, heck maybe even a year ago.
MAGA - Make Alliance Great Again
In regards to the coming weeks
With blizzard it normally means months lol
As far as the next expansion I’m certain they have at least a trailer but putting together a presentation currently is likely rough
They had the blizzconline stuff canceled and are likely holding it for the replacement which will likely be a livestream of premade videos
- - - Updated - - -
I mean 5.4 and 6.2 were both over a year but that was all a shit show
- - - Updated - - -
Do you think the same people working on patches for SL have been working on 10.0?
You realize development on it started before SL released
I am guessing you are counting Ruby Sanctum to interrupt ICC's 12 months or 6.2.5 for 6.2's 14 months or the .5 patch for 8.3's 10 months. Which is doesn't matter. The point is that it is a long content drought the minor patches didn't help. But even if you try to ignore all that 5.4 still lasted 14 months with no content drops.
...Le Poète est semblable au prince des nuées
Qui hante la tempête e se rit de l'archer;
Exilé sul le sol au milieu des huées,
Ses ailes de géant l'empêchent de marcher.
Charles Baudelaire
That's not a "plot hole". That's what I was being pedantic about, not that I was wholly disagreeing—a "plot hole" usually refers to, say, the "how" of something, or something which is not addressed. It is an actual flaw in the narrative, not the quality of the narrative in itself.
Furthermore, why use Zovaal and not Yogg-Saron, who had already been long-established and connected to a real, preexisting plotline that was being explored? He would solve the problem well enough—this also opens another connection with the Void. Wouldn't it be easy to simply say the Legion used necromancy because it is not susceptible to the Void? We've also seen no real conflict between Death and Fel up until Shdowlands showed Maldraxxus acting against them. Before then, it seemed like Necromancy was very much controlled by them—aside from Argus, we see Necrolytes originated from them.
- - - Updated - - -
That's something I agree on—I think it is odd that people seem to ignore this. Although it is true that it is an asspull they decided "AKTHUALLY HE DID THE SCOURGE GUYS!!! HE'S SUPER IMPORTANT!!!! YOU HAVE TO CARE ABOUT HIM NOW!!!", I do think that people overblow it. He didn't secretly scheme and plot the whole narrative just to get one little blonde guy to steal something.
I think it's an asspull simply because it hamfists relevancy to the Jailer. However much he is an asspull villain, he is not the retroactive super-genius. I do think that implicating him in Sargeras' corruption and the Dreadlords is what does really put me off—I honestly would be able to suspend my disbelief if it were just the Scourge, but they simply went too far. If the Dreadlords simply were revealed to have been in exile like was previously suggested until they decided "lol no actually we were working for denny", I'd probably have forgiven and forgotten this plot.
But that's exactly the problem, not because something makes sense in the lore it automatically becomes a good narrative.
Again, the problems isn't that these events are now connected necessarily, but how they are used to basically tie up EVERYTHING *but* the Old Gods to one Singular villain's plan. Because it's literally being framed as such, a "long awaited plan finally coming to fruition".
- - - Updated - - -
And how cool would it have been if we actually were shown this, instead of being framed as him being on top of everything? Because let's not gaslight ourselves, the "Every Event Sent in motion, every pawn put in place" clearly is trying to sell that everything is part of the same masterplan.
Disagree. The interpretation that he set countless plans into motion and simply capitalised on the ones that worked out to his favour makes far more sense.
He previously made it clear that the Lich King thing didn't really work the way he wanted it to, so it's clear that not all plans worked out for him, and not all pawns ended up being useful.
Us not seeing all the failed plans is simply a matter of there only being a limited amount of time to tell the story, so the focus is going to be on the plans that actually worked and are thus of concern to us.
That's being disingenuous, and you know it. When I say he's being made responsible for everything major happening, I am not being facetious or hyperbolic.
Nathrezim, Agents of Denathrius who is in league with Zovaal, are the ones that corrupted Sargeras. These eons of manipulation, that lead to the War of the Ancients, then the Orcs attacking Azeroth, so the 1st, 2nd and 3rd war because oh, the Helm was ALSO created by Zovaal. Then he starts manipulating Sylvanas, and then in Legion, the plan started by the Nathrezim comes to fruition, and Argus soul is finally used to break the Arbiter.
So the WHOLE story of the Burning Legion, thus everything they did, was a manipulation to be used as pawns for Zovaal's plans.
Only stuff related to the old gods gets out of the "everything."
Shadowlands is literally telling us that Zovaal and Denathrius were working together all this time. It literally frames the whole Burning Legion as pawns used to fulfill Zovaal's plan of disabling the Arbiter.As already said, it was never clear whose side the Dreadlords were on. They've been doing shady shit and had their hands in all sorts of pots since WC3. Their original characterization had them manipulating Sargeras, their retconned characterization had them working "under him" but for their own goals, the current iteration is just the exact same as both of those, but now we actually know what some of those goals were and who they actually follow.
It isn't blatantly inaccurate, but I can't be bothered to go line by line through the entirety of warcraft history with you to point out that all he infleunced were a handful of events, and that those events aren't changed by virtue of being his influence, it's just that the events had larger repercussions and motivations than originally written.
That is not just "influence" it's purpose. Sargeras was totally on the blind, but Argus getting killed and destroying the Arbiter, THAT WAS THE PLAN.
It would be very different if Sargeras whole thing was just something influenced by Nathrezim. The problem lies with the fact that Sargeras manipulation by the Nathrezim WAS to create an entity like Argus and use them to disable the Arbiter and help free Zovaal.
And why does it suck's narratively? Because basically takes all the previous threats and makes them part of a previously at best obliquely alluded character, who never had ANY characterization until this very expansion.
How it's hard to get that "character that appears 25 years later in a story and that was twist behind everything" is bad writing?
It wasn't, rly, you talk like beings one domain can only use power of their domain, we knew for a fact Kil'jaden was a powerful magician, he would know about necromancy.
Using the necromancy and the scourge to weaken azeroth, was a good way to masquerade the legion, who would knew the demons were behind it? putting the janitor and the dreadlords into it make all the events from wc3 and alter be something dumb
its more that the artifact gained more power as more souls it took, and the LK had enough time to control a lot of people, the power of it its was more of "being able to have a huge army" not making the LK itself a god-like entity.It makes absolutely zero sense for the Burning Legion to craft the strongest Death artifact ever, yet never show anything else on that level ever again.
There is many artifacts with similar power, like we saw in the artifacts weapons, it was just tuned down for gameplay purposes.
Well DUH, it really is the better interpretation. The point is that's not how the story has framed it at any point. It's a narrative issue, not a lore one.
And THAT'S why it is an issue of framing and characterization, because nothing on the way he acts or presents himself... even suggests that. That's why he sucks as a villain as well.He previously made it clear that the Lich King thing didn't really work the way he wanted it to, so it's clear that not all plans worked out for him, and not all pawns ended up being useful.
Us not seeing all the failed plans is simply a matter of there only being a limited amount of time to tell the story, so the focus is going to be on the plans that actually worked and are thus of concern to us.
Like, we could have gotten that if, imagine, Zovaal was actually elated that this was the one that worked.
No, instead we get the boring thanos "this was inevitable" characterization where he pretends it was all part of his plan.
Thanks. In all these leak seasons and fake fan logos I had never really looked at the real ones in such depth before. It was fun noticing all the little details I never had before.
I was saying not that long ago about how I didn't really know what to say until we got something like the Kul Tiras textures, but the logo discussions have been good enough for me. I didn't even like Empire of Dragons when we first got it, but the more we dissected it, the more I started to appreciate the details in it as well. I thought the theming in its border was more common, too, before I went back and looked at the older fakes and realized how much simpler they were by comparison.
Even that Origin of Dragons logo has interesting elements to it, for me, and I'm curious as to the story behind the decisions. The "W" and "C" are more or less the normal Warcraft letters. but the rest of them have been subtly changed. First, all of them have been sized up to match the "W". Then, while the bottom half of them is more or less the normal font for Warcraft, the upper halves have been changed to be flat on top. Also, the "A"s now connect to the following letter, which is a neat touch. There's a simple effect and blurry texture on the letters, and the Origin of Dragons pairs poorly with it, but I don't mind the font/design itself.
I'm also trying to enjoy this while I can because I'm not exactly looking forward to any dragon-focused expansion myself.
I wondered about this myself awhile back and did some comparisons. It's actually pretty close to some of the buildings in Bastion, it's just that the concept art creates an impression that doesn't match what's in game.
The concept art, at least to me, looks like the magical mirage of a palace in the middle of a desert, but it's actually just one of the Kyrian structures floating over the grassy fields that have a sandy-gold cast to them. If I recall, the building's design is actually matched fairly closely to a location in game, but most Kyrian structures tend to be these weird sort of facades, which is not what you'd assume from the concept art.
To me, this is the biggest disappointment of Shadowlands. There's a lot of things I wish were done differently, but when it comes to Zovaal's plot, we really needed to see what he was involved in. Retcon or no, it would have felt so much more powerful to actually see how the context of old events was being expanded. There was a lot of controversy over how little we knew about what the villains were trying to achieve, but we also didn't really learn anything about how they got to where they were which should have been fair game. I was really looking forward to us examining these old plots and loose threads through a new lens, but for the most part we're left to assume.
Or, you know, he could just point out the times when it didn't work. Besides, with this approach it was inevitable and part of the (overarching) plan. Fire a shotgun enough and eventually you'll hit something. That doesn't make him not an opportunist, though. It just means his grand plan was largely based on trying everything and going with what happens to work out.
You're pretty much just ignoring everything that contradicts your assumptions then claim there is no evidence to the contrary.