So we are less than 3 weeks from 9.2 imo. Late March 10.0 reveal? I wish it were sooner but oh well.
So we are less than 3 weeks from 9.2 imo. Late March 10.0 reveal? I wish it were sooner but oh well.

Looks like. Well, it's reason to ignore him even if he straight up tell "today we will have big wow news". At least when Towellie say to expect wow news today, it happens.
So I stick to next Thursday as date reveal. 15th would be strange date for patch anyway, it's rocket week.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
Originally Posted by A Young Super Dickmann
I edited my post for clarity, I was referring to a fabled Demon Hunter Tauren and the unlikely gliding animation
Anyway about the being anything line of the riddle, I remembered a bit of Ion's interview about cross-faction: "Your faction is something that you are born into. It is not a choice you make. It it assigned based on race and the team wants to stray away from the idea that because you are "born an elf, you must hate trolls and nothing can change that" mentality"
Maybe all races will start neutral?
To the point that many still haven't moved on from the denial stage. Many are still convinced that they'll be getting that Shadowlands-themed Necromancer in a forthcoming expansion, or a Dark Ranger class after the culminating chapter for Sylvanas. That's just not how Blizzard - or marketing and development in general - operates. Unified vision is the name of the game. You don't get that if you add in tentpole features after you've taken the tent down, so to speak.
- - - Updated - - -
That reads as the opposite for me. You can't choose where you start is the whole point. Orcs are Horde. Humans are Alliance. Empowering the players to make their own choices thereafter is the goal.
A shame, I liked that visual better.
I wouldn't put it past them. The thing with the faction business is that it's a slippery slope and while the gameplay benefits are clear, the thing he's addressing and Ion himself likely doesn't give half a shit about is foundational to the functioning of the setting. This entire line of argument inevitably leads to the point of detaching all defining characteristics that aren't purely visual from a given race because no member of a race 'has to' be anything. An elf doesn't 'have to' hate trolls, but elves don't exist, they're archetypes who have certain in-built characteristics that are part of their narrative role and the fantasy they sell. The weight that comes from an elf not disliking trolls or being say, a tinker, where as a rule elves are more attracted to the natural world or what have you is because these archetypical qualities exist. But without these qualities the only thing that separates an elf from a troll is which one is teal and has tusks. It reduces races to purely physical appearances and while it allows more variety that variety is surface level only because the core premise is that all peoples are ultimately identical where fantasy lives and breathes on not just what races are but what races aren't.Anyway about the being anything line of the riddle, I remembered a bit of Ion's interview about cross-faction: "Your faction is something that you are born into. It is not a choice you make. It it assigned based on race and the team wants to stray away from the idea that because you are "born an elf, you must hate trolls and nothing can change that" mentality"
Luckily I feel loosening class restrictions is a lot less likely. Partly because unlike faction restrictions it doesn't have any direct gameplay benefit in terms of functionally upping the playerbase and secondly because Blizzard will never be arsed to make druid forms for 20+ races.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
Originally Posted by A Young Super Dickmann

They would turn red, because they would become chaos orcs. This is HS, so not canon, but it's good reference:
While I in part agree with you, that can is already open since WoD:
https://es.wowhead.com/transmog-set=1800/stormwind-set
https://wow.zamimg.com/modelviewer/l.../1/9/1801.webp
Then add the heritage armor and the shop transmogs, and you already are there.
The fear Blizzard has about players running around in silly costumes, not only is baseless (if you look at other MMOs with almost no restrictions, you barely see silly costumes), but stupid, because they already made it posible.

orc corruption goes from brown->green->red.
But, to answer the guy you answered, maghar can be DH or warlocks without turning green, you don't get corrupted just by using, if you have enough will/control., otherwise every warlock would be green/red and have horns.
- - - Updated - - -
Hope not, it was a dumbass response for him,

We want vague Chinese riddles, not this notepad screenshot shit
#1 Hype-Thread Shitposter - Overlord of the Hypethread


Food for thought: given their post-WoD experiences under Yrel's zealots, would Mag'har count Light as form of corruption?
The mag'har probably would consider it corruption but is it really? So far we have not seen anyone get changed from over use of light like growing glowsticks or tattoos, neither have we seen it cloud peoples judgement or make people crazy(you could say the venthyr but that seems more like the specific scar left to punish them and not the passive pressence of light). The only proccess in which the use of light seems invasive is the lightforging proccess that we do not know yet the full side effects to call it corruption, might seem like a brainwash on lothraxion but we can't be sure since he might be acting and tyralion or any other light forged does not seem overly fanatic other than the AU lightforged.

Chaos Orc DH remains the dream.

Because we haven't really seen many examples of extreme Light corruption yet. Most situations we've encountered, Light was the underdog. It certainly is capable of it, though. Lightbound, what Xe'ra attempted on Illidan, possibly Lothraxion... (definitely bodily, unclear on how it affected his mind)
You also have to remember what the Light is like. A Light-crazed being would be a different type of crazy than Void or Fel. The type of crazy where everybody sings praises in unison and there is no true individuality.
They likely see it as analogous to fel, yes, since both involve surrendering your will which they put a premium on. Also explains why they're okay with the Void which is based around one's personal will as well as the whole tentacle business.
@Vakir
Orcs and draenei are the sensible DH races with ready-made representations.
Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
Originally Posted by A Young Super Dickmann
So, what was yesterday's "big announcement" that people were hyped up for?