1. #2541
    The Unstoppable Force Raetary's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Base Camp
    Posts
    20,340
    Why do people like you consider it a WoD situation if they end it in 9.2, anyway?
    Because it would be?

    When people look at warlords, they see a cut-off, content starved expansion.
    Evident by the amount of content updates past launch, which is only 2 patches.

    The majority of the playerbase does not sit around measuring exactly how much content an expansion had, they just take a look at the amount of content updates past launch and judge it from there.

    If Shadowlands ends in 9.2, people will deem it another wod-like failure.


    Also, can we stop dancing around 6.1 all the time?
    Whether we like it or not, the patch was at the time seen and advertised as a major content update to warlords.

    'Us' not considering it a content update, doesn't suddenly not make it one.
    Or change the publics perception of it.
    Last edited by Raetary; 2021-05-28 at 07:51 PM.




  2. #2542
    Quote Originally Posted by Arafal View Post
    Because it would be?

    When people look at warlords, they see a cut-off, content starved expansion.
    Evident by the amount of content updates past launch, which is only 2 patches.

    The majority of the playerbase does not sit around measuring exactly how much content an expansion had, they just take a look at the amount of content updates past launch and judge it from there.

    If Shadowlands ends in 9.2, people will deem it another wod-like failure.


    Also, can we stop dancing around 6.1 all the time?
    Whether we like it or not, the patch was at the time seen and advertised as a major content update to warlords.

    'Us' not considering it a content update, doesn't suddenly not make it one.
    People already deem SL a failure. Lots and lots of people. Ending it in 9.3 instead of 9.2 isn't somehow going to change this perception, in fact it might make it worse and feed perceptions that Blizzard is so far behind that they are not able to push out expansions every 2 years anymore. There's always a silver lining to everything.

    Your 6.1 statement is pure historical revisionism. Not even Blizzard was delusional enough to think an heirloom collections tab, twitter integration, and a few more garrison followers amounted to a "major content patch". Please stop with the mental gymnastics.

  3. #2543
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward Wu View Post
    People already deem SL a failure. Lots and lots of people. Ending it in 9.3 instead of 9.2 isn't somehow going to change this perception, in fact it might make it worse and feed perceptions that Blizzard is so far behind that they are not able to push out expansions every 2 years anymore. There's always a silver lining to everything.

    Your 6.1 statement is pure historical revisionism. Not even Blizzard was delusional enough to think an heirloom collections tab, twitter integration, and a few more garrison followers amounted to a "major content patch". Please stop with the mental gymnastics.
    People deem every expansion a failure when the droughts start to set in. Even the best expansions are not praised unti lafter the fact.

    WoD is partially deemed the wrost expansion in part because it only went to 6.2. What actual content there was hardly mattered as players looked at it as the expansion that got abandoned.
    If SL only goes to 9.2 then it will inevitably draw the same complaints, regardless of how many times you try to remind everyone that 6.1 was the Selfie cam patch.
    Unless 9.2 is the holy grail of WoW patches and 10.0 is announced to be the second coming of Christ then ending the expansion that early will do nothing but fuel the fires of Blizzard abandoning expansions. And honestly they will even if the patches are that good considering the idea is that Blizzard abandoned it because of player complaints despite them getting into a good groove by the end.

    I am willing to somewhat agree with you because of the extraoridnary circumstances SL has found itself in, and because I believe it might be for the best if the developers cut something short to hit the next expansion running, but it would be insane to think this would be anything but a supremely risky move that risks the WoW playerbase deflating even further, much less that such a choice would be lauded by the players at large.
    The world revamp dream will never die!

  4. #2544
    Void Lord Aeluron Lightsong's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    In some Sanctuaryesque place or a Haven
    Posts
    44,683
    Abandoning expansions is bad all the way around, they gotta stick it through, I rather not see WoD again(Err the massive time between to WoD's 6.2 to Legion.
    #TeamLegion #UnderEarthofAzerothexpansion plz #Arathor4Alliance #TeamNoBlueHorde

    Warrior-Magi

  5. #2545
    If Blizzard tries to end Shadowlands at 9.2, and doesn't expect the community to give them hate, then they are truly delusional. Like even if they wrap up all the story and nicely end it at 9.2, I don't think the community will accept that, they will just claim "WoD 2.0" no matter what.

  6. #2546
    Quote Originally Posted by Gifdwarf View Post
    If Blizzard tries to end Shadowlands at 9.2, and doesn't expect the community to give them hate, then they are truly delusional. Like even if they wrap up all the story and nicely end it at 9.2, I don't think the community will accept that, they will just claim "WoD 2.0" no matter what.
    Really depends on how far the next x-pack is away and how exciting that thing is.

  7. #2547
    Quote Originally Posted by Sondrelk View Post
    People deem every expansion a failure when the droughts start to set in. Even the best expansions are not praised unti lafter the fact.

    WoD is partially deemed the wrost expansion in part because it only went to 6.2. What actual content there was hardly mattered as players looked at it as the expansion that got abandoned.
    If SL only goes to 9.2 then it will inevitably draw the same complaints, regardless of how many times you try to remind everyone that 6.1 was the Selfie cam patch.
    Unless 9.2 is the holy grail of WoW patches and 10.0 is announced to be the second coming of Christ then ending the expansion that early will do nothing but fuel the fires of Blizzard abandoning expansions. And honestly they will even if the patches are that good considering the idea is that Blizzard abandoned it because of player complaints despite them getting into a good groove by the end.

    I am willing to somewhat agree with you because of the extraoridnary circumstances SL has found itself in, and because I believe it might be for the best if the developers cut something short to hit the next expansion running, but it would be insane to think this would be anything but a supremely risky move that risks the WoW playerbase deflating even further, much less that such a choice would be lauded by the players at large.
    To be honest there's possibly a whole host of reasons why SL might be unpopular with people that are entirely out of Blizzard's control now.

    Maybe the fact that the expansion theme is sort of doom & gloom is off-putting to people during a pandemic when depression rates have soared? Who knows.
    Maybe the fact that the pandemic is causing them to be so behind and exacerbating the negative feedback loop of SL makes it harder to continue comfiting to the expansion due to their stay-at-home work output being lower than before the pandemic?

    People can come up with so many reasons. I'm not saying all of them are Blizzard's fault. Like you say, it's the extraordinary circumstances we find ourselves in that the patch structure for this expansion is already unprecedented. What else could be?

  8. #2548
    Quote Originally Posted by Hellspawn View Post
    Really depends on how far the next x-pack is away and how exciting that thing is.
    If they have backlash for cutting Shadowlands short, they would have to have a Demon Hunter-level early expansion reveal outside of blizzcon. I remember how out of place the gamescom reveal was, was also the first time I made an account on mmoc.

  9. #2549
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward Wu View Post
    People already deem SL a failure. Lots and lots of people. Ending it in 9.3 instead of 9.2 isn't somehow going to change this perception, in fact it might make it worse and feed perceptions that Blizzard is so far behind that they are not able to push out expansions every 2 years anymore. There's always a silver lining to everything.
    And you know that how, exactly? You don't actually have access to any reliable source for this. You're just assuming people agree with your position.

  10. #2550
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward Wu View Post
    People will once again call me a hater but I really believe they should end SL in 9.2, genuinely for the long-term health of the game.
    For that I wouldn't call you a hater, I would call you short sighted. We paid full price for expansion and we all should expect full patch cycle.

    People screamed "BfA is not working, scrap that and move to next" as well. Yet BfA broke sales record from Cata and SL broke BfA record.

    I don't remember many voices against while content was fresh, on the opposite, many were pointing honeymoon period is longer than usual (imo Legion one was longer). It's not yet obvious if SL structure works better or worse than BfA/Legion heavy grinding. Right know we just lack patch content.

  11. #2551
    Quote Originally Posted by Dracullus View Post
    For that I wouldn't call you a hater, I would call you short sighted. We paid full price for expansion and we all should expect full patch cycle.

    People screamed "BfA is not working, scrap that and move to next" as well. Yet BfA broke sales record from Cata and SL broke BfA record.

    I don't remember many voices against while content was fresh, on the opposite, many were pointing honeymoon period is longer than usual (imo Legion one was longer). It's not yet obvious if SL structure works better or worse than BfA/Legion heavy grinding. Right know we just lack patch content.
    Pretty sure the box price of Shadowlands is for the opening 9.0 content only. I think the subscription is what covers the "funding" of patch content, bug fixes, server stability etc.

  12. #2552
    so lest say we get 9.1 in 5 weeks
    this fits due to the fact we still have 8 mythic bosses to test
    2 bosses per week is 4 weeks
    last week for stability

    this means about 3-4 months after it we get 9.2 info

  13. #2553
    Quote Originally Posted by zantheus1993 View Post
    so lest say we get 9.1 in 5 weeks
    this fits due to the fact we still have 8 mythic bosses to test
    2 bosses per week is 4 weeks
    last week for stability

    this means about 3-4 months after it we get 9.2 info
    I guess first will be 9.1.5 with usual 1.5 content (Brawler's Guild, Legion timewalking, smaller stuff) - I guess late July for PTR, late September for release. So October would be 9.2 reveal/PTR, December/January for release. All dates of course if they're more or less back on track.

  14. #2554
    Quote Originally Posted by Dracullus View Post
    I guess first will be 9.1.5 with usual 1.5 content (Brawler's Guild, Legion timewalking, smaller stuff) - I guess late July for PTR, late September for release. So October would be 9.2 reveal/PTR, December/January for release. All dates of course if they're more or less back on track.
    give me my damn maw skip

    i still dont understand why it isnt being put in 9.1

  15. #2555
    Quote Originally Posted by zantheus1993 View Post
    so lest say we get 9.1 in 5 weeks
    this fits due to the fact we still have 8 mythic bosses to test
    2 bosses per week is 4 weeks
    last week for stability

    this means about 3-4 months after it we get 9.2 info
    Also depends on whether the raid opens immediately. I could easily see 2-3 weeks which could be used for raid testing. So really it could all depend on how long the patch itself needs, which doesn't need to be a lot.
    The world revamp dream will never die!

  16. #2556
    Quote Originally Posted by TheFirstOnes View Post
    It does not fit with the existing lore at all. Titans can have connections to the Eternals and other members of other Pantheons, sure. But "daddy Argus" did not rule over the fucking Brokers. Jesus fucking christ.

    And so what if they do have an identity? The Eternal Ones and co also have identity, so fuckin what?

    - - - Updated - - -



    I always saw the Earth Mother as a spiritual embodiment of Azeroth's World Soul, yeah. Like an Avatar of sorts.

    What if you are proven wrong eventually? Will you stop with the: overdramatic caps you know it all posts?

    I am joking with you, just rlx. I for one welcome new lore its just stupid they try to link everything.
    Last edited by Alanar; 2021-05-17 at 02:54 PM.

  17. #2557
    Quote Originally Posted by zantheus1993 View Post
    give me my damn maw skip

    i still dont understand why it isnt being put in 9.1
    Have mount? With mount it's fastest level you get in 50-60 (without it too btw). Worst part are 2 or 3 explanation RP moments, I always go AFK there.

  18. #2558
    Over 9000! Makabreska's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Streets Strange by Moonlight
    Posts
    9,482
    Quote Originally Posted by zantheus1993 View Post
    give me my damn maw skip

    i still dont understand why it isnt being put in 9.1
    Wut? I'm 100% sure I saw the news that they do implement the skip in 9.1.
    Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.

  19. #2559
    Quote Originally Posted by Makabreska View Post
    Wut? I'm 100% sure I saw the news that they do implement the skip in 9.1.
    They're putting in a skip for bulvar's torghast quests. Still no Maw intro skip
    Quote Originally Posted by choom View Post
    Which one of those ropes can I hang myself with

  20. #2560
    Mid June launch

    Sylvanas fight Uber bugged

    Morgan was wrong about the amount of sockets
    You can get up to 8 not 4-5

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •