I'll actually concede there, given that people are still convinced that Le Big Funni Retcon Man Mal'Ganis was retconned into being all dungeon bosses evar!!! because of a sequence of teensy-tiny references in the form of briefly transforming into dungeon bosses, something which has existed in several other encounters.
Nevertheless, even assuming it may be true, I figure it may be worthwhile to assume that consumers are intelligent. Perhaps I simply don't have enough of a complete disregard for the intelligence of an audience to be a modern writer.
Last edited by AOL Instant Messenger; 2022-03-14 at 10:32 PM.
I figure it's mostly putting them front-and-center. I also find the aesthetics a little hard to reconcile with other extant classes, and as aforementioned, I don't see any class being added unless it really fits the theme. Unless we get a shocking swerve Undermine expansion out of nowhere or maybe a very specific world revamp, I don't know why we'd get Tinker.
Ok so the mount hint we have for the next expansion is the red cat
It’s definitely a wonderland reference
Has ties to Blood elves
I’m not going to reach about the colors beyond scarlet crusade
So my theory
The final patch did cause screwy things on Azeroth and our return is like Alice returning in through the looking glass. The schroedinger’s cat mount is because the world didn’t know if we were dead or alive. The scarlet crusade will be there and have support in the time we’ve been gone. Gonna say there will be a dragon because of the wonderland tie so a dragon which would be the black dragon behind the scarlet crusade. The red queen could be seen as the head of the scarlet and the white queen would be Calia. The blood elf connection could be due to Alleria and her void issues and the unfinished story threads of “will the blood elves go back to the alliance?” From MoP
I can’t let myself believe in galakaros because that name is too dumb and even if Jericho supports it he was caught last leak season bullshitting about a dragon expansion with a new AP system then being hunted down by blizzard legal. Also we got told DH wasn’t launched until legion because they want to match the theme…how does tinker match dragon?
I don’t use the steamscale because it wasn’t the last mount. I don’t use the zodiac mounts. The dragon bundle is a possible hint but has no previously established pattern unlike the others.
Underground expansion to heal the world soul and discover the hidden wonders within Azeroth. Jumping-off point being Undermine and a reclaimed Gnomeregan.
They don't need to be as important as Arthas or Illidan, they just need to be as important and cool as Chen. Gazlowe and Mekkatorque are about equal level of importance and coolness as Chen Stormstout, so we're good.I don't see any of this in any of the proposed leaks. Who are the great lore characters that are tinkers that are equal in importance and coolness to Arthas and Illidan?
That's an opinion. There are a lot of players who enjoy technology-themed classes, and WoW does not have a technology class in its lineup. That addition could draw in new or former players.It just doesen't make any sense. Tinkers are just not cool enough to be a selling point to an xpack.
I think you're reading too deep into it. I'm not a fan of "the door is just red lol" interpretations, but I do think this might be a little closer than they were suggesting. They didn't subtly, carefully foreshadow an expansion with something that has figurative or metaphorical ties to the existing themes—they released mounts that seemed nonsensical at first but became immediately retroactively obvious when connected with a zone's aesthetic.
Someone posted this on 4chan without explanation. He stated that he work at Blizzard. Probably fake btw
![]()
I definitely agree with the idea that Blizzard is going a little too far out-of-bounds with how they're trying to subvert the tropes so much, but I frankly don't think they're doing it as much as you're suggesting. The only things that have been interesting in this expansion are the Denathrius retcon and the geometry theme (which only really makes since if you like philosophy of religion or theology—people who aren't part of a certain religious clique may have trouble understanding it), and the rest has been fairly banal—the attempt at moral philosophy with Sylvanas is pretty mind-numbingly bad, given that we already had Blizzard do a very good (for the standards of something so cheesy) moral conundrum plot with Arthas' Culling of Stratholme.
Still, being trope-y doesn't mean it has to be bad. Again, Culling of Stratholme was a very good use of a very traditional storyline. I also would say they did their best to avert some tropes, even if it was just trading one reference for another—"Look! King Arthur is actually Elric of Melnibone!" is still a very fun twist on it. "Thanos ... but ... Thanos" isn't so interesting—no villains before now were just robotic MacGuffin-seekers. I really think a good, interesting plot could be done with this—even a subtle one. We've, again, seen subtlety before in the Culling of Stratholme. We've seen Cosmic Horror done adequately with Ulduar. I don't think that the plot is that inherently bad, nor do I think viewers wouldn't get it. I honestly think players would fully understand something that makes them think a little bit more about what's going on. Again, we've seen plenty of interesting and sincere debates on the Culling of Stratholme.
They're not at all all derivative—the Triumvirate was interesting and not very similar to anything we've ever seen before, Arthas still took good advantage of the storylines we've had before, War of the Ancients etc.—the lore is based on cheesy tropes, but that doesn't mean it's entirely derivative. You're thinking of this too cynically. There have been good plots befor and it's not wrong to expect something more.
sylverian dreamer
No way that tied to shadowlands and it’s flavor mentions the dream
When we got the zones it did make sense but we also have to keep in mind devs are more often trying to make cheeky references nowadays. The main thing that made me see wonderland was the red queen and white queen
You kind of have to use the Steamscale because like the Sylverian Dreamer it was a 6 month promotion AND Blizzard released its companion pet in Shadowlands which was also a mechanical dragon using the same skin. Also both dragon mechs had distinctly dragon lore, and they sort of merge the huge Goblin/Gnome thematic hints in BFA with the draconic hints in BFA.
Unless we have confirmation the new scarlet leader pushing the false heir is a guy
- - - Updated - - -
We don’t have to because it wasn’t the last release
The sylverian dreamer was the expansion mount so it added to the pattern
- - - Updated - - -
But what if the guy that claimed to make it in photoshop saw it on 4chan and came in to try and debunk it because they are a blizzard plant???? FOR THE SCALE GUARD!!!!!!!!
It's always going to be very difficult to gauge an expansion as a whole on a mount. That said, you can successfully guess bits. Sylverian dreamer is tied into the druidic/night aesthetic, and sylverian reinforces that with the wood/forest aspect--and we got a zone that was heavily tied into those things. You might not get Broken Isles and Legion from the runesaber, but saber + arcane did evoke highborne (Arcane using Night Elves), and we got 1-1.5 zones of that.
Based on the fox-cat, I feel really confident in guessing that one of the new zones in the next expansion will be a Vermillion Redoubt/Eversong Woods style, autumnal forest. It will be very magical, like the summer/fall palette version of Ashenvale or Moonglade. Lots of little sprites and weird magical creatures like the foxcat, the phoenix birds used for the skyblazer, etc.
Last edited by Hitei; 2022-03-15 at 01:30 AM.