Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.
Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
Again, you seem to be missing the point that there is a history of mounts and pets that foreshadow future content. I don't know why you keep missing this point, but those are simply the facts.
Incorrect. Heart of Aspects didn't enter the PTR until November of 2011, long after MoP's announcement.Lol, the Heart of the Aspects was datamined before the MoP anouncement, which is why everyone happens to look at the mounts as indicators since we never knew there was a connection at the time. It was just a curious looking store mount being datamined, no one really expected a full Pandaren expansion would be hinted at by a store mount of all things.
- - - Updated - - -
Would you prefer "Foreshadowed"? Either way, the fact remains that a store pet in WotLK did give us a preview of future content multiple expansions before it was released. If you want to straw-man that instead of discuss it, that's your choice.
Ok let’s go with this
There’s two issues that i see
1. You are saying this fits a pattern with 1 previous case being the panda pet but you are using a mount. If this were a pattern there would have to be a store pet or mount in MoP that predicted Legion or WoD predicting BfA
2. Lorewise the steamscale was built while the pet was a natural thing
3.(my personal favorite) the pet wasn’t a shop item it was an event item…consider it a bonus unless the anniversary items from previous years also predict an expansion
7.3 model released early. Closest we got were the Blizzcon mounts revealed and released before the expansion reveal.
Yes, the Draenei on Draenor use them. And besides that one, there were also the Iron Horde chimera and the Ravager mount released during pandaria before WoD's reveal.
No, but Sylvarian Dreamer is straight from Ardenweald.
I never said it was a pattern. I'm merely pointing out the precedent.
I don't see how that's relevant.2. Lorewise the steamscale was built while the pet was a natural thing
The Timeless Mechanical Dragonling is tied to the Steamscale Incinerator, which indicates that whatever this is, it carried over from BFA to Shadowlands meaning that neither are part of either expansion, but something else.3.(my personal favorite) the pet wasn’t a shop item it was an event item…consider it a bonus unless the anniversary items from previous years also predict an expansion
That's the point.
And my point is that they were not mobs from new expansions turned into mounts, but mounts turned into mobs in new expansions. Nothing in their description or anything mentions ANYTHING close to the expansion they are supposedly from. Hell, the Sylverian Dreamer is apparently from a magical dream world, certainly not Ardenweald. The Enchanted Feydragon literally mentions it to be Brightwings brother and has nothing referencing Outlands or Draenor. The Ravager was released in WoD, and the Chimaera was released when WoD was announced.
I mean, the best case to point out here is the Enchanted Fey Dragon. Makes ZERO sense to be on Draenor.
Last edited by Makorus; 2022-03-15 at 10:37 AM.
Yes, the last store mount before the release of the next expansion.
Which would be the Drakemountemerald-buff mount that was datamined.
Honestly, if we got Dragon Isles that had no connection to Gnomes and Goblins, you'd probably still think the Steamscale was a hint towards it.
How will DarkRangercels feel when Tinker is finally revealed and Dark Ranger continues to already be in the game as Hunter?
Also the fact that Dragon Isles has an identical random mention "huh we don't really know anything about this" in the most recent WoW coffee table book the same way Shadowlands before it's release should pretty much end any debate on where the next expansion is.
It's not about something hinting at one thing or another, Blizzard very much uses the storemount models for future content in some form.
The Mystic Runesaber came out in wod, manasabers are the staple mounts of Suramar.
The Starseeker was a creature on Argus.
The Sylverian Dreamer and Vulpine familiar are all over the place in Bastion and Ardenweald.
The feydragon were used on Draenor
And then we have thematic mounts like the incinerator (after which we got Mechagon) (or perhaps not? i don't remember when that thing was released) and the warforged Nightmare (after which we got wod).
Knowing that, we could use recent store releases and speculate with them in mind.
Formerly known as Arafal
Uh, the expansion is going to be announced before we find out what that mount is.
Honestly, I wouldn't. If the next expansion drops and it has nothing to do with Goblins and Gnomes, I'll gladly admit I was wrong. No harm, no foul.Honestly, if we got Dragon Isles that had no connection to Gnomes and Goblins, you'd probably still think the Steamscale was a hint towards it.
I doubt you would do the same.
Last edited by Teriz; 2022-03-15 at 11:02 AM.
its a shame that it took a GIF of the creator to convince you guys that it was fake. It was obviously fake from the beginning. While it is really well done, way too low quality for a Blizzardo logo.
I will not reply to posts that are non-constructive or contain flaming and/or trolling.
So because they are both mechanical dragons they are related in terms of design
This is why I mentioned lore and why I mentioned that the pet isn’t from the store so it has no place in that discussion
- - - Updated - - -
*puts on suit of tinfoil armor*
Actually that gif is the equivalent of the gravity falls Fiddleford leak
The developers are trying to throw us off the scent after someone managed to leak the logo. The logo is real and the “author” is a blizzard plant.
It’s not relevant to my point you’re right, and on top of that the RPG source was (and still is) considered not a canon source. So that wasn’t canon at the time, and the only things from there which became canon were the ones seen in MoP; and they became canon through MoP, and not through an acknowledgment of the RPG source (it pains me to say so, as the RPG has a lot of good unused material, but at the end of the day if Blizzard doesn’t consider it canon, it’s not).
Last edited by Fahrad Wagner; 2022-03-15 at 11:16 AM.
Last edited by Triceron; 2022-03-15 at 11:22 AM.