Does that mean we are going to fight Giants?
- - - Updated - - -
Agreed. I actually rather like the new geometry motif and the lore around the actual, underlying structure of reality, but the real soul of WoW for me should be on Azeroth. These references to old theology are very good, but better suited to a palatable and structured plotline which can have some tangible connection to the world we're here for. There's a reason why everyone was so thoroughly apathetic to Shadowlands—it had no connection to Azeroth proper and simply felt like a complete departure from established lore.
I frankly am holding out hope that Dragonflight features a proper revamp or at least focuses on Lordaeron as much as the Dragon Isles. I'd prefer to see something familiar for once.
I was thinking something about a way of connecting Lordaeron and the dragons. Do you guys remember how the plague from the Wrathgate was cleaned? dragon fire from the red dragons, so...what if we ask Alextrazsa to cleanse Lordaeron and something happens there that connects the whole thing?
Dude, they are so royally fucked if the MMO C Dragonflight leak is not the real one, anything else would be a major disappointment in comparison.
I hope for their sake that they have something real bonkers for their expansion reveal.
therewillbedragons got the date wrong and had a lot of stuff overlapping with Viking91's proposed Empire of Dragons, which obviously ended up being untrue. He was also, if I'm not mistaken, temporarily banned at first.
So I dunno. But that's the kind of low effort bullshit I'm anticipating.
How would that work in combat though?
It’s one thing to turn into a werewolf when entering combat - it’s another to turn into a dragon and somehow not roflstomp the gnome rogue attempting to stab you with daggers the size of your scales in the arena.
And if you don’t become a dragon in combat …why?
I believe this leak is legit. Blizz leaked it on purpose to generate hype before the reveal on 19th. Last time they 'leaked' a screenshot of Bolvar and artwork of Bastion days before Shadowlands reveal on Blizzcon. This is the same thing essentially.
I hope they arrange things a bit so that shadowlands gets rolled into the earlier leveling content. Either keep 60 as the cap and nerf everyone back to 50, or if they raise the cap to 70 make it so 1-60 can be any expansion.
Anything so I don't have to do SL on my alts lol
I remember those times! I've been here in each of these threads since then as well, I just don't post all that much (excluding lately) and am not memorable.
- - - Updated - - -
If you look at his post history he outright said he came up with the blandest most boring things he could think of so it would be really vague and generic and thus more believable.
Hey guys you remember how you wanted a beautiful autumn forest filled with sun-warmed cats? Welcome to New Tirisfal!
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah I stopped visiting the official forums in favour of MMOC sometime during Mists and I think I really only started coming here at all when Mists of Pandaria's name was leaked but I was a lurker for a while before actually making an account.
Haha something to be proud of indeed =P
Now that I've caught up with this thread after a few hours, I'll put in my totally unasked for two cents.
I do not think/am pretty sure that the Dragonflight text leak is fake for reasons others have already stated. My main sources of contention are as follows:
The concept of micro-classes isn't an awful idea at all, but it's heavily dependent on implementation and design. The choices between which class concepts meet the criteria of micro-class as opposed to those who are reduced to class skins is odd. No offense to the concept of bards and chronomancers or those that like them, but they're not as popularly requested as necromancers and dark rangers who could easily be a fourth spec or micro-class. That isn't to say that these couldn't/shouldn't be micro-classes either, because both could just as easily be a forth spec/mini-class. It would make more sense to make all the class concepts mentioned in the leak to mini-classes if that's the best option going forward from now on.
My next issue is specific to Minstrel which seems to be a healing only mc with a weapon unique to it and only it. Why would Blizzard design a mc around weapon that only one class with one spec could use in the entire game? While it is true that glaives are only useable by DH, they have two specs as opposed to the Minstrel's one. A healing only class while not impossible to level would be pain in the ass to do so.
Tinkers are easily able to fill out three specs as are Dragonsworn. I could see Dark Ranger pulling off two, maybe three with a stealthy ranged bow wielding shadow spec and a healing spec based on banshee abilities. Definitely not impossible to separate from hunters.
With the recent datamining I am more inclined to think that the Dark Rangers will fall under a possibly neutral Darkfallen allied race. I am by no means against getting a class skin for Dark Rangers, but I feel it'd be extremely reductive and unappealing to the fantasy I and others have. I could see us getting a Darkfallen race with the spooky racials and then getting the class skin to perfect it. I'd hope that humans, forsaken, nelves, and belves would all be able to use the skin.
PS: The textures claimed to be part of the new Alex look seem to have a phoenix emblem and are more likely unrelated.
On silken ebony wings the harbinger of death arrives.
Fair enough - though picking a faction for dragon(kin)s would be somewhat lore comical.
I think my biggest reservation for that form is …boy howdy worgen and tauren helmets are going to look like the statue of David in comparison to the future mutilations done by drakonoid helms.