I'm guessing a metallic dragonflight would be our 10.3 patch. The epilogue, having finally gotten our hands on the MacGuffin to re-empower the dragonflights, has us re-originating the existing dragonflights into metallic counterparts.
- - - Updated - - -
Would anyone have the previous trains saved? It would be interesting to see all the previous final iterations lined up.
Can't wait for us to finally summon Bahamut and fight Tiamat.
yeah, i talk about this ealier, but things have being lost due to many people talking over, i see the "forces" as just basic "law/neutral/chaos" and depending on who wield/uses, it can be evil or good. One of the reasons i would be up for an expansion with the light as villain, as a lawful evil force.
Alignment is something rly hard to pin down and it rly depends on context, even someone "lawful good" can do evil/bad stuff if it means it will go hand in hand with his own code or his people/kingdom code.
Not how I understood this, but I feel like there isn't any definitive truth there. To me Arthas was still in control all the time, but both ner'zhul and him were fighting the domination magic of the Jailer and keeping the undead at bay. Which is something that hasn't meant a lot before we were introduced to the Jailer. We even get a line from Zovaal stating that Arthas and Ner'zhul actually did some good by going against the Jailer's plan. It is still the sword that pushed the spirit of Ner'zhul on Arthas and the helm that merged the two.
- - - Updated - - -
You're quite confused there :/
They never invalidated or retconned anything from chronicles as it is a book written from a point of view. They unfortunately did introduce the book as the chart of everything we know and at the time, we understood it as "definitive encyclopedia". And we didn't know everything of course, they are expanding the universe and its lore and have been quite straight forward about it.
The picture you're talking about is still very much valid and still will be as picture in that instant of what the titans know about the universe
????
how not? they sell the book as the warcraft bible, word of god, the de facto source of canon lore, then they say "its just a prank bro, its all titan perspective" literally invalidating the book and his purpose.
Nope, its was not that "we understood" its what they said and sold.They unfortunately did introduce the book as the chart of everything we know and at the time, we understood it as "definitive encyclopedia". And we didn't know everything of course, they are expanding the universe and its lore and have been quite straight forward about it.
Last edited by Syegfryed; 2022-04-11 at 03:34 PM.
none information from the cronicles was retconned, please god stop with this nonsense
Lets see...
- Changed from Lore bible to 'titans perspective only' - which makes absolutely no sense as like 90% of it doesn't even involve them.
- Titans were dead as they couldn't manifest in the Keepers, they are alive again in 7.3
- Titans were the planets themselves, Sargeras being described with mountains and volcanos on his back, Audio drama retcons the titan planets to be cocoons and 7.3 flat out shows Sargeras in his proper Living Nebula state.
- Spirit Healers were established as rogue Val'kyr, in SL it turns out it was the smurf covenant all along.
- Nathrezim were pure, original demons that formed in the twisting nether, SL turned them into Denathrius' toys.
But sure, no retcons at all.
Last edited by Raetary; 2022-04-11 at 03:54 PM.
Formerly known as Arafal
Lawful Neutral is neutral on the moral axis, i.e. it is neither Good nor Evil. The same way a Neutral Good character is neither Lawful nor Chaotic.
It doesn't mean what you say here at all.
A law doesn't have to be explicitly stated, either. There's plenty of "unwritten rules". The Titans very clearly expect things to go a specific course and will resort to extreme measures when it doesn't, with it having been explicitly stated that they're perfectly willing to wipe out and rebuild planets to achieve this. That's not Neutral behaviour.
Also, as far as the Void is concerned, every path is true. They also explicitly have the ability to see the future, though this is of questionable use as they see all potential futures so for the most part it's just an incomprehensible jumble.
Your view is already incorrect based on the information we have now.
- - - Updated - - -
Maybe you should re-read the Chronicle. It doesn't state half of that.
Spirit Healers for example were not established as rogue Val'kyr in a way that made Kyrians impossible. It was stated that some became Spirit Healers... which may well have involved them dying.
Titans were also only described as appearing that way. It isn't at all clear if their original bodies were actually created from the planets.
Titans were dead in 7.3. Sargeras was torturing their disembodied souls. The Chronicle actually explains why they couldn't manifest.
The Chronicle never gave anything outside the Titan's perspective, either. Perspective doesn't mean "personally involved". It just means there's nothing in there that the Titans couldn't know about.
About the only point is the Nathrezim. Which is in keeping with their focus on deception and trickery, all things considered. For that matter, they were pretending to be Void worshippers.
There's also the problem that people keep assuming it was meant to be a comprehensive encyclopedia when that would have been practically impossible to do without ending the franchise. It was, and still is, for the most part definitive. It's not comprehensive, never could be and was never intended to be.
Last edited by huth; 2022-04-11 at 04:24 PM.
How would the Titans know of all the things that happened while they were dead?
Also, when something is written from someone's perspective, it is presented as such. Could be reports written by Constellars. Tablets like the Disks of Norgannon that would record what happened. Yet what we got was not someone's account, it was a list of events that in no way intimated being someone's account.
Really, this narrative technique they say they are using is very common in fantasy. But it is always done in a way that makes it clear it is subjective. And the promotional material for the Chronicles literally called them "Definitive tomes of Warcraft history".
Definitive literally means "complete, final, authoritative, exhaustive"
Last edited by Nymrohd; 2022-04-11 at 04:31 PM.
Do you have to put it like that? I'm eating.
- - - Updated - - -
I get all that. But then it begs the question: What even is the point? Like imagine this pitch to the fans:
"We made the lore a hot mess so to clear it up here is the subjective biased account of keepers who gathered a bunch of info for the titans while they were kinda sort of maybe dead."
I'm pretty sure 99% of the reactions would have been: Screw that, give us the actual answers.
And yes, it is true that providing definitive answers is difficult for an ongoing game like WoW, but the status of Chronicle as a lore bible didn't survive the end of Legion. They could have stuck to it a bit longer I feel.