1. #40461
    Over 9000! Makabreska's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Streets Strange by Moonlight
    Posts
    9,478
    Quote Originally Posted by Amstrup View Post
    It's a speculation thread Jesus...
    I mean, sure. We all know that 4chan has a great track record of legit leaks and is defo not riddled with trolls who do stuff just for teh lulz.
    Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.

  2. #40462
    Quote Originally Posted by ulillillia View Post
    Ok, so you're boxed into playing your "High Elf" as a void-corrupted Elf. So a Void Elf. Blood Elves are better High Elves right now. No idea why people bring up Void Elves as an example of High Elves, when Blood Elves are visually and racially closer to High Elves. And they have Silvermoon and Quel'Thalas.
    There's a difference between a curious High elf practising the Void and an actual Void elf, as in an elf who was permanently and irreversibly twisted by the Void.

    It's the same distinction between a curious Blood elf practising the Fel and a Felblood elf.

    In other words, one of the reasons why "Void elves" are the perfect race and the best race is because their background allows you to roleplay your PC in whatever way you want. The Void elves race is literally perfect.

    If you're having problems properly RPing your character, you might simply lack imagination, but that's alright, RP is not for everyone. The Void elves race as presented in-game already offers you all tools needed to RP as a biological High elf.

  3. #40463
    Quote Originally Posted by Berkilak View Post



    - - - Updated - - -



    I've also played with the Dragon Disciple prestige class. I love the concept.
    You guys really commit to the bit and I love it

  4. #40464
    Quote Originally Posted by ercarp View Post
    Mage already has two of the most interesting time-based abilities my unimaginative brains can think of. Healing would be the most unique option (reversing time to heal wounds) I suppose, but I still want dragons.
    I'm with you; I absolutely am; I think the best way to have that cake and eat it to is *with* dragons.

    *Points to the concept in my sig*

    That's how I imagine it working; a healing spec that has some hefty time focus, but also utilizes other dragonflights where appropriate

  5. #40465
    Quote Originally Posted by Arafal View Post
    Portals and Blink/shimmer are telemancy, not chronomancy.
    Chrono Shift and Time Anomaly are mere passives.

    The rest can be altered in name, or just stay as they are pure pink/purple arcane spells and a bronze dragon chronomancer class/spec is gonna have a heavy sand theme.
    What about the leader of the Titan Pantheon, Aman'thul? Arcane and Time have heavy overlap beyond just ability names.

  6. #40466
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Those people would be wrong on multiple levels.
    Like you were every time you predicted Tinker as the only logical choice for the next class and when you said that Demon Hunter will never happen cause we already have Warlocks.

  7. #40467
    The Undying Teriz's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Undermine
    Posts
    34,132
    Quote Originally Posted by ercarp View Post
    Mage already has two of the most interesting time-based abilities my unimaginative brains can think of. Healing would be the most unique option (reversing time to heal wounds) I suppose, but I still want dragons.
    Temporal Shield already does that too.

    Quote Originally Posted by ulillillia View Post
    Like you were every time you predicted Tinker as the only logical choice for the next class and when you said that Demon Hunter will never happen cause we already have Warlocks.
    Considering your "friends" are now saying we can't have a future class because Blizzard could only come up with 2 DH specs, I would say that prediction was rather accurate.

  8. #40468
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    There's a difference between a curious High elf practising the Void and an actual Void elf, as in an elf who was permanently and irreversibly twisted by the Void.
    You don't have to. Because what you say is nonsense anyway.

    Every Void Elf character is corrupted by the Void. You can't roleplay a Void Elf as not being corrupted by the Void.

    That's like saying you can roleplay your Worgen as not corrupted by the Worgen curse.

    Besides, it's not even about roleplaying for me. I don't care about roleplaying.

    It's about playing a High Elf, with High Elf racials, High Elf mount, High Elf heritage armor and High Elf visuals on the Alliance side. Void Elves do not make that possible and never will.

  9. #40469
    Quote Originally Posted by ulillillia View Post
    Saw this on 4chan

    This made me laugh. Thank you.

  10. #40470
    Quote Originally Posted by ulillillia View Post
    You don't have to. Because what you say is nonsense anyway.

    Every Void Elf character is corrupted by the Void. You can't roleplay a Void Elf as not being corrupted by the Void.

    That's like saying you can play your Worgen as not corrupted by the Worgen curse.
    I'm not getting through to you. I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt, but now it's clear to me that you just lack imagination and aren't suited to RPing.

    Plenty of people roleplay their Worgen character as an uncorrupted Gilnean, literally take a look at the Stormwind Cathedral square on AD once in a while.

  11. #40471
    Quote Originally Posted by Varodoc View Post
    I'm not getting through to you. I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt, but now it's clear to me that you just lack imagination and aren't suited to RPing.
    I just said I don't give a shit about roleplaying.

    But if I did, that immersion would break every time I enter combat and my skin turns purple.

    And don't give me any shit about "roleplaying as High Elf curious about the void".

    If I was a roleplayer, I wouldn't like the fact that that would be the only way to roleplay an Alliance High Elf, because that is the antithesis of what a High Elf is supposed to be. Blood Elves would be better High Elves.

  12. #40472
    Scarab Lord ercarp's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Suramar
    Posts
    4,970
    Quote Originally Posted by ulillillia View Post
    Like you were every time you predicted Tinker as the only logical choice for the next class and when you said that Demon Hunter will never happen cause we already have Warlocks.
    Blizzard creates more balancing issues with their borrowed power systems. A class on its own is obviously going to make things harder, but it's not like it hasn't already been an absolute disaster with all the systems on top of systems and the hundreds of variables they have to account for with each Soulbind and Covenant combination etc. etc.

  13. #40473
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Considering your "friends" are now saying we can't have a future class because Blizzard could only come up with 2 DH specs, I would say that prediction was rather accurate.
    Your prediction that they would never do Demon Hunters is rather accurate? Are you that blinded?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Zankai27 View Post
    The classes are more balanced right now than they've ever been. Get this argument outta here. Every spec is viable at some level of high end play.

    And Demon Hunters are a much less rich idea pool than dragons or t words.
    People constantly complain about balance issues, recently more than ever before.

  14. #40474
    Quote Originally Posted by Yunravel View Post
    Ok so now, I'm worried.

    That is a terrible rating for a great movie. No joke, Reign of Fire is fantastic. It's literally the only movie I can think of that got Dragons right from a non-fantasy D&D standpoint.

  15. #40475
    Quote Originally Posted by ulillillia View Post


    People constantly complain about balance issues, recently more than ever before.
    Large portions of the fanbase has no idea what balance actually is. Next.

    That, and even if they were so imbalanced it was unplayable, it's still time for something actually new to play. It's been 7 years.

    You don't win people back by iterating.

  16. #40476
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferlion View Post
    That is a terrible rating for a great movie. No joke, Reign of Fire is fantastic. It's literally the only movie I can think of that got Dragons right from a non-fantasy D&D standpoint.
    You're thinking about reign of fire from 2002 with Bale and McConaughey

  17. #40477
    Scarab Lord ercarp's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Suramar
    Posts
    4,970
    Quote Originally Posted by Nokster10 View Post
    You're thinking about reign of fire from 2002 with Bale and McConaughey
    I can't even find a 2018 Reign of Fire on IMDb.

  18. #40478
    Quote Originally Posted by Nokster10 View Post
    You're thinking about reign of fire from 2002 with Bale and McConaughey
    I might be yes. I just noticed the date.

  19. #40479
    Quote Originally Posted by ercarp View Post
    I can't even find a 2018 Reign of Fire on IMDb.
    Seems that's just the French name.

    Looks like it was released as "Dragon Kingdom" to English speaking audiences.

  20. #40480

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •