1. #40821
    Scarab Lord plz delete account's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    No matter the topic, someone will find a way to redirect it to complain about their current aggro.
    Posts
    4,803
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitei View Post
    He says it'll be like Lego Rock Raiders, but more Lego Lord of the Rings instead of Lego Star Wars.
    Thank you!

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by D4nnYb0Y View Post
    HOTS is a MOBA and a failed one at that.
    TAKE IT BA- (remembers winter event is still up)
    Nevermind, you are spot on

  2. #40822
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    A dragon class is pretty much required to wear mail. I do agree that the heal and RDPS specs should be INT. The Tank spec should be AGI.
    This is why I think it is going to be a full caster and may not even have a tank spec or possibly even 3 specs. The tank spec would have to be based on the Black Dragonflight, and I think the class fantasy there would be human form Deathwing in full plate swinging his big two-handed hammer using dragon abilities.

    Basically this:

    https://hearthstone.fandom.com/wiki/Deathwing_(hero)

    But this class is definitely not going to wear plate, it's definitely not going to be STR based, and this class fantasy is too similar to DKs. I basically just described Bolvar but dragons.

    I also do not think Wrathion represents an AGI tank class fantasy so I don't think there is going to be a tank spec. At least not based on the Black Dragonflight. I love this class fantasy so I hope I'm wrong.

    Maybe we'll have our first ranged tank?

    *Edit* Also, because frankly everyone expects Blizzard to design a Dragon themed class with 3-5 specs representing 3-5 Dragonflights, and they know that. There is going to be a twist that no one expects.
    Last edited by D4NNYB0Y; 2022-04-14 at 03:17 AM.

  3. #40823
    Quote Originally Posted by D4nnYb0Y View Post
    Kind of strange IMO since I would think Invoker would be more appropriate in this context. Evoker is a Wizard subclass in DnD specializing in Evocation (offensive) magic.
    By D&D logic, Evoker is just what WoW calls Mage.

  4. #40824
    Quote Originally Posted by Das Momo View Post
    I mean, by that logic Gilijim's Island has been hinted at for 11.0 and Programmer Island might be next. Dragon Isles wasn't mentioned in actual lore until pretty recently. Do you remember when in WotLK they said 'Shadowlands'? All I found were "ghost world, astral realm, world of spirits, world of spirit, Other Side and spirit void".
    The original Chronicle Vol. 1 specified those as the Shadowlands, until Grimoire and Danuser decided Chronicle wasn't canon anymore and those were references to the "Veil", not the "Shadowlands". While the name Shadowlands originated in Chronicle Vol. 1, it was attributing to things we've been seeing since Wrath.

    Also while the original Dragon Isles didn't make it out of Alpha, it's definently something players have been aware of. The cancelled Lord of the Clans adventure game and even the WC2 manual both specify dragons living in the northern parts of the EK. But again, you are correct that in canon materials it's first explicit mention was in BfA, though the Exploring Kalimdor book implies the dragon quests in Bloodmyst from BC are tied to it as well now.

  5. #40825
    Banned Teriz's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Undermine
    Posts
    34,072
    Quote Originally Posted by D4nnYb0Y View Post
    HOTS is a MOBA and a failed one at that. What works in a MOBA does not necessarily work in an MMO.
    Er, what? Multiple HotS abilities and concepts are in WoW currently and in the WoW class lineup. Sylvanas' ability set in Sanctum of Domination for example was her HotS kit, and she passed some of those abilities over to Hunters and Rogues. Not to mention all three WoW expansion classes got their entire WC3 kit translated into WoW. RTS abilities are the same as MOBA abilities.

    Chromie's kit for example would not translate well to WoW...
    Why?

    and is not what I think most people visualize as a "time mage" class fantasy
    Well yeah, because Chromie and the Bronze dragons aren't time mages. If you want to be a Time Mage, you play a Mage. Chromie's kit is a unique RDPS spec that utilizes the sands of time, which is befitting of the Bronze dragonflight. Players would appreciate that quite a bit.

    To answer your question, because I believe Scaleface is telling the truth, and he said his first thought when seeing the new class was it stepped on Mage's, specifically Arcane, toes. I think this is because the class will have a Chronomancy spec that appropriates the time theme from Arcane Mages. I would be fine with this personally. There is a lot of design space that Arcane Mages don't explore for time magic.
    Yeah, I don't buy it, mainly because there's only so many ways you can do a time-based spec, and Mages cover pretty much the entirety of it. You speed targets up, you slow them down, you can speed up allies, you can create temporal bubbles that restore your health, you have your cooldowns randomly occur, etc. There really isn't much left beyond that. Also what hero character is this spec based on? It isn't Chromie, and the Bronze dragonflight, because they're utilizing the sands of time.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by huth View Post
    By D&D logic, Evoker is just what WoW calls Mage.
    Mages even have a spell called Evocation.

  6. #40826
    Quote Originally Posted by D4nnYb0Y View Post
    Read pages 2061 - 2064 for the full context. Reading between the lines it sounds like the class name is Evoker and one of the specs will be Chronomancy.

    Kind of strange IMO since I would think Invoker would be more appropriate in this context. Evoker is a Wizard subclass in DnD specializing in Evocation (offensive) magic. Plus Invoke is a keyword in the Hearthstone dragon expansion specifically relating to invoking the powers of Galakrond.

    Maybe Evoker will be themed as a Sorcerer similar to a DnD Dragonblood Sorcerer?
    @Scaleface and @feniela any new info before bedtime?
    WoW mages are literally Evokers in D&D's context. The original magic system of warcraft was/is even based on D&Ds classification of magic schools (evokation, transmutation, necromancy, etc.) and mage lore pretty much tells us that they just evoke their elemental powers from somewhere else. So an evoker class would be absolute nonsense. It's like implementing a felmancer class, because warlock wasn't warlocky enough.
    You are welcome, Metzen. I hope you won't fuck up my underground expansion idea.

  7. #40827
    "Invoker" makes more sense if we're being literal

  8. #40828
    Quote Originally Posted by huth View Post
    By D&D logic, Evoker is just what WoW calls Mage.
    Evoker is a standardized "spellcaster" in that it can be basically anything magical a given setting wants it to be. Much like "warlock" operates in completely different ways in different settings, or "shaman" is anything magical and relating to nature or more natural spirits.

  9. #40829
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Er, what? Multiple HotS abilities and concepts are in WoW currently and in the WoW class lineup. Sylvanas' ability set in Sanctum of Domination for example was her HotS kit, and she passed some of those abilities over to Hunters and Rogues.



    Why?



    Well yeah, because Chromie and the Bronze dragons aren't time mages. If you want to be a Time Mage, you play a Mage. Chromie's kit is a unique RDPS spec that utilizes the sands of time, which is befitting of the Bronze dragonflight. Players would appreciate that quite a bit.



    Yeah, I don't buy it, mainly because there's only so many ways you can do a time-based spec, and Mages cover pretty much the entirety of it. You speed targets up, you slow them down, you can speed up allies, you can create temporal bubbles that restore your health, you have your cooldowns randomly occur, etc. There really isn't much left beyond that. Also what hero character is this spec based on? It isn't Chromie, and the Bronze dragonflight, because they're utilizing the sands of time.
    Sylvanas is not a playable class in WoW. The weapon procs / actives are a false equivalency.

    Chromie's entire kit is based around using time traps to freeze enemies, primarily other heroes, in place so that she can connect difficult to aim skillshots that have a nearly 1 second delay before landing. This would not work in WoW. The Sands of Time theme could definitely work, but I suspect it will be a healing spec not a ranged DPS spec.

    Here's a good example of a Chronomancer from GW2:

    https://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Chronomancer

    There's definitely plenty of design space left to explore especially from a support standpoint.

  10. #40830
    5 More days….

  11. #40831
    Chromie in HotS is essentially just a uno-card Mage, I dont really see where her kit is unique at all compared to an Arcane Mage.

    Her Q and W are as basic abilities as it gets, her E is just a glorified non-attackable Frost Nova + Deepfreeze, and her second Ult is essentially Alter Time but for the enemy.



    I think people put far too much emphasis on the word Envoker.

    The Class will very likely be called Invoker during development cycles due to it invoking three of the Dragonflights powers.
    I doubt they'll go lower or above that and just let the Class sit at 3 specs.

    Black: Tank or DPS Agility Melee
    Bronze: Ranged/DPS Intelligence Caster

    The only important question is if its gonna be Red or Green Dragonflight for the healing spec. I would say that Blue is out since its nothing else but a Mage, and with Ysera being essentially "dead" in Ardenweald (and touching a bit too close to Druids), the only living Dragonflight Leaders we have are Wrathion, Nozdormu and Alexstrasza.

    So the healing spec is gonna be Red Dragonflight, possibly how its handled in HotS, dealing fire DoT damage to support, somewhat in the way of a Disc Priest, and to heal your teammates.

    Theoretically they could stretch this Class up to five specs and include all Dragonflights but we gotta be realistic and honest here, this is Blizzard we are talking about. I am not even certain if it will even get 3. Maybe less specs would be for the better considering what for a design and gameplay failure Demon Hunter is.

    Either way, if you cannot transform to a Dragon in Combat, its gonna be rather meh in the end anyway imo, unless the customizations with a Tail, Scales and Horns will make up for it. But knowing Blizzard and with Dragons being too big, and a scaled down Dragon Form looking too weird (not to mention 20 of them in a Raid), it's probably just the Flight Form.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kumorii View Post
    It just sounded ominous as if he would save that info for future use to something, that's all.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shandalar View Post
    Next class is Necromancer. Tinker will never happen.

    You read first here.
    Oh yeah?

  12. #40832
    Pandaren Monk Pheraz's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Feralas, Mount Hyal, Quel'Danil Lodge
    Posts
    1,768
    Night warrior is also a class blizzard could introduce, after they've shown that you can survive it and it's not limited to night elves.
    Nodon | Vynd | Pheraz | Fenryl | Schatten | Unheilig | Farodin | Landoran - Plus 20 more...

  13. #40833
    Leak incoming

    Dragonsworn Class (think 2hand wielding caster/melee themed around spear and Alexstrasza's red dragonflight)
    Tank spec - based off healing yourself with flames that also burn your enemy.. as well as protecting yourself with flames.. ofcourse
    Ranged DPS - spec basically a rip off of Red Mage.. cast building a meter that you jump in to deplete in melee then get back out
    Healer spec - very interesting Melee based healer.. think disc priest but in melee

    all 3 specs are derived from Alexstrasza's theme if i didnt already make that clear

    -edit- woops in my haste i forgot to mention that you do not turn into a dragon like dh turn into demons you are just bestowed the power of her flight
    Last edited by Dragonsworn; 2022-04-14 at 05:08 AM.

  14. #40834
    Quote Originally Posted by Pheraz View Post
    Night warrior is also a class blizzard could introduce, after they've shown that you can survive it and it's not limited to night elves.
    Honestly, with Tyrande's whole Illidan-lite getup, Night Warrior would be a cooler skin for DH than the alleged and almost certainly fake Warden one.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonsworn View Post
    Leak incoming

    Dragonsworn Class (think 2hand wielding caster/melee themed around spear and Alexstrasza's red dragonflight)
    Tank spec - based off healing yourself with flames that also burn your enemy.. as well as protecting yourself with flames.. ofcourse
    Ranged DPS - spec basically a rip off of Red Mage.. cast building a meter that you jump in to deplete in melee then get back out
    Healer spec - very interesting Melee based healer.. think disc priest but in melee

    all 3 specs are derived from Alexstrasza's theme if i didnt already make that clear
    Wow, how incredibly convenient that this comes up immediately following multiple pages of hot discussion over such a concept.

  15. #40835
    The Lightbringer Enrif's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    3,949
    Quote Originally Posted by Cosmic Janitor View Post
    WoW mages are literally Evokers in D&D's context. The original magic system of warcraft was/is even based on D&Ds classification of magic schools (evokation, transmutation, necromancy, etc.) and mage lore pretty much tells us that they just evoke their elemental powers from somewhere else. So an evoker class would be absolute nonsense. It's like implementing a felmancer class, because warlock wasn't warlocky enough.
    I agree with this assessment. In addition, looking at the localization (i mentioned this some 30 pages or so back) it would not make sense to have an evoker as a class as it does not translate well into other languages. Evoker as is, is just a mage under a different name.

  16. #40836
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonsworn View Post
    Leak incoming

    Dragonsworn Class (think 2hand wielding caster/melee themed around spear and Alexstrasza's red dragonflight)
    Tank spec - based off healing yourself with flames that also burn your enemy.. as well as protecting yourself with flames.. ofcourse
    Ranged DPS - spec basically a rip off of Red Mage.. cast building a meter that you jump in to deplete in melee then get back out
    Healer spec - very interesting Melee based healer.. think disc priest but in melee

    all 3 specs are derived from Alexstrasza's theme if i didnt already make that clear

    -edit- woops in my haste i forgot to mention that you do not turn into a dragon like dh turn into demons you are just bestowed the power of her flight
    They're gonna struggle making specs with multiple Dragonflights at their disposal and you want to tell me they want to make one into three?
    Quote Originally Posted by Kumorii View Post
    It just sounded ominous as if he would save that info for future use to something, that's all.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shandalar View Post
    Next class is Necromancer. Tinker will never happen.

    You read first here.
    Oh yeah?

  17. #40837
    Quote Originally Posted by Vakir View Post
    Wow, how incredibly convenient that this comes up immediately following multiple pages of hot discussion over such a concept.
    Believe me or dont you'll see in 5 days no skin off my back.. Just sharing what i was told

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by High Tinker Buliwyf View Post
    They're gonna struggle making specs with multiple Dragonflights at their disposal and you want to tell me they want to make one into three?
    From what ive been told the struggle has been trying to get the ranged spec to flow correctly.. And the healer spec to not feel too gimped when forced out.. Not with coming up with abilities

  18. #40838
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonsworn View Post
    Leak incoming

    Dragonsworn Class (think 2hand wielding caster/melee themed around spear and Alexstrasza's red dragonflight)
    Tank spec - based off healing yourself with flames that also burn your enemy.. as well as protecting yourself with flames.. ofcourse
    Ranged DPS - spec basically a rip off of Red Mage.. cast building a meter that you jump in to deplete in melee then get back out
    Healer spec - very interesting Melee based healer.. think disc priest but in melee

    all 3 specs are derived from Alexstrasza's theme if i didnt already make that clear

    -edit- woops in my haste i forgot to mention that you do not turn into a dragon like dh turn into demons you are just bestowed the power of her flight
    While I don't doubt at least *one* spec leaning primarily on Alexstrasza's themes, I don't think they'd do a dragon class using only one flight's powers. Even is red is the most "heroic" one. So yeah no.

    Though I'd be lying if I said I hadn't considered the same idea, seeing Alexstrasza's new key art.

  19. #40839
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonsworn View Post
    Believe me or dont you'll see in 5 days no skin off my back.. Just sharing what i was told

    - - - Updated - - -



    From what ive been told the struggle has been trying to get the ranged spec to flow correctly.. And the healer spec to not feel too gimped when forced out.. Not with coming up with abilities
    Why are you here defending your leak? If it was real you'd just dump your info and then leave.

  20. #40840
    i love all the leakers appearing now

    none are credible of course but its always fun

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •