I know its not real, but THIS is still the best sounding expansion IMO.
I know its not real, but THIS is still the best sounding expansion IMO.

Talent trees returning has me more hyped than a new class tbh. Would be cool if they kept old talents + MoP style talents at the same time, could be two different systems.
And where do these issues come from? Girls like Eugenia Cooney think they are too fat, so they try to lose more and more weight. It's unrealistic standards of beauty that we put into these girls minds through media. But continue to ignore it because you don't want to bear the responsibility for it.

The level squish in SL does make talent trees returning a definite possibility. Big reason they were removed before was the ever increasing max level made designing talent trees virtually impossible.


Could have been speculating before like everyone else or just been told info. If he's press he would have just recently been sent a press kit.
Nhiosis was the poster that said Axaron is not lying. Both accounts are old: 2009 and 2014 so not burners.
They're also just posting brief statements in a thread. Not seeking attention.
Most leaks happen a week before the announcement or less as info is disseminated to 3rd parties for distribution post NDAs/embargoes.
Most leakers do not have connections to devs but work for 3rd parties involved in the industry. Who knows?

Talent trees sound great, but what the actual fuck regarding Evoker being full Arcane magic themed?
I really don't buy that. At least Demon Hunters and Warlocks had pretty distinct fantasies. Evoker and Mages would still be casters, just with one tree being invalidated to be expanded into 3?


Eh. Mages are sold on being "masters of the arcane," lowercase A. Referring specifically to "arcane magic" and "arcane incantations." It's not the damage type specifically they're using, but their niche is still being at home with those kinds of arts.
So having something specialize in it with even more variation (i.e. at least 2 versions of damage dealing using it) still feels...off. Even if the written lore would contradict it, it still implies that evokers can "do it better" or are more legitimate.
Evoker would be fine if "evoking" refers to something (like, say, channeling draconic powers) separate from how "evocation" in most concepts (like D&D) refers specifically to damage-dealing magicks.
We'll see in 36 hours, I guess.