This is a weird thing to say when evocation comes directly from DnD.
http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/wizard:evocation
This is a weird thing to say when evocation comes directly from DnD.
http://dnd5e.wikidot.com/wizard:evocation
And if you'd actually read your link you would realize that evocation is simply what mages in WoW already are, because it's one of the most prevalent schools of magic being taught in dalaran. So calling something else entirely evoker would just be nonsense.
Again I ask, why are people so adamant about definding this rubbish leak?
You are welcome, Metzen. I hope you won't fuck up my underground expansion idea.
I mean... you're the one trying to apply latin definitions as some weird side argument for why it can't be used. An argument that doesn't even hold up well since calling out/forth is the logical action here for a class calling forth dragon magic. Invocare (call upon) doesn't make much sense unless your class is literally summoning dragons (i.e. calling upon them).
It's also not even a matter of defending a leak, so much as it's pointing out that people apply really faulty reasons for why a thing can't be added.
I think we’re getting baited a bit, but I do think the expansion will in some sense be dragon related, but not how we think, definitely not like that leak.
So far the only leaked stuff that was somewhat confirmed by either data mining, strings, or a "trustworthy" leaker, was a new class, likely being the Evoker, and also the Dragonflight name. There is anything else?
I'm asking this because everyone believes that Dragon Isles as a continent is somewhat confirmed as well, but nothing is confirming it, right? No data files, strings, or even a "trustworthy" leaker, or did I lose something?
Last edited by Luck4; 2022-04-18 at 07:14 AM.
dragonflight name
evoker is not confirmed because the "trustworthy" leaker got more wrong than he did right when he "leaked" legion and the people claiming to be his source also have connections to jericho who was another that got leak guesses but lost credibility 4 years ago
The title Dragonflight, and ensuing tiered levels of purchase (base, epic, heroic editions) was data mined from a Blizz website. That would be the only “official” leak of any kind. There was a leak prior to the data mine with the game titled as Dragonflight, so since that leak potentially got the name right, people started thinking the rest of the big leak may be right, but I don’t have much faith in it tbh.
I think the Alex picture and logo is basically confirmed at this point too. The R in World on that image is clearly using the new font that they have been posting with online in the past week or so. I was skeptical till I noticed that, but I'm pretty sure it came out way before they started using that font online.
Yea, I agree with you about the multiple themes over an expansion. I just think something big is being left out for the reveal, something really cool to get people hyped to buy the expansion. Almost like with the shadowlands predictions, the name was known for a while, but people had some wild theories about it being mainly old god themed. I’ve heard about the restoring Azeroth theme, and even the trailer “leak”, but what I’m guessing is the reveal is going to be dragon themed, but completely different than anyone has guessed so far.
We're past the point of reasonable scope. The Broken Isles and Kul'Tiras were scaled up enough to cover a "continent", despite all previous existence being much much smaller. The INFINITE AFTERLIVES of the Shadowlands ended up being only 5 floating islands.
It's very easy to buy the Dragon Isles as the next continent.