1. #48241
    honestly, I don't see why that model couldn't wear armor. Well, aside from the head and wings, that is. Most of WoW's armor is textures stretched over a body and a small fraction is textures stretched over a body with a plate or two glued to/hovering above a part of the body.

    Ignoring the tail and wings, it's basically as complicates as making armor for worgen.

  2. #48242
    Quote Originally Posted by Syegfryed View Post
    Neither do i, but apparently blizzard want to milk the j-rpg "dragon humanoids" being pretty to appeal that fanbase
    If that's the route they wanted to take then it would been better to just make tied to a class only and give them a bunch of customizations that mirror Alex, Ysera, Kalec etc. I assume that's the fantasy most people are after at this point.

    Not that hideous lizard thing we've seen SS of.

  3. #48243
    Quote Originally Posted by Deventh View Post
    They literally have chest armor and helm on that latest pic:
    In the same way that Metamorphosis forms also wear "armor"


  4. #48244
    Quote Originally Posted by Deventh View Post
    They didn't even do that for Worgens 10 years ago why would they do it now? Worgens actually look much more annoying to put armor on than this "dragon".
    Probably because they are giving us humans with horns and cramming a drakonid type race onto it in an attempt to make it unique.

  5. #48245
    Quote Originally Posted by Nyel View Post
    What about pink / a very light red?
    paladin

    trust me i forgot about that too lol

    i think we could get a different orange color though and yellow but yellow is too limiting

  6. #48246
    I was hoping that this reveal wouldn’t have any controversies but I see how this is going to go down.

    The race is a new OC that are drakes that got close to arcane and evolved into more humanoid deals with elves/humanoid forms. It’s 100% based on Au Ra and because of this its going to have a lot of casual appeal while annoying each and every oldhead that wanted any of the other races.

    Here’s to another year of twitter shitstorms
    Last edited by Cheezits; 2022-04-19 at 12:42 PM.

  7. #48247
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitei View Post
    The race is a stand-in for dragons and one of the iconic bits of wow dragons is that they can shapeshift into mortals.
    Well yes, but this is very much not the dragons we are used to.
    What we have now are proper full size dragons that use a smaller humanoid form to interract with smaller beings.
    This is very much not that, so I don't really get why they wouldn't just stay in this form all the time.
    The world revamp dream will never die!

  8. #48248
    I am Murloc! Wangming's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Not Azeroth
    Posts
    5,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Zexaniro View Post
    lol we'll see
    You have any leaks that contradict it, I take it? Out with them.

  9. #48249
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Except it isn't a minor one. We have three races that utilize the concept, two faction leaders that are Tinkers, a WC3 and HotS hero who are Tinkers, and multiple areas in Warcraft lore that revolve around the concept.

    Also please don't put words in my mouth. I didn't say Blizzard is taking a huge risk by ONLY not implementing Tinkers, I said they would be taking a huge risk implementing unknown race and class concepts over KNOWN and demanded for race and class concepts. The Tinker isn't the only item included in that.
    No one cares about Tinker. Genuinely. Would rather have a reason to play a caster.

  10. #48250
    Quote Originally Posted by Wangming View Post
    I still mourn it.
    Same. And also Ny'alotha for me, and N'zoth as a whole, really.

  11. #48251
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Truth be told, a Tinker would be better for the health and wellbeing of WoW than a completely unknown spell-caster class that cannibalizes Mages and Druids.
    tinkers cannibalize shamans and DHs

    but then again DH was an impossible class as well

  12. #48252
    New image leaked of a dragonized gnome and dwarves in the new player housing.
    Now we all can finally play mamma pappa barn.

    https://imgur.com/a/9LJO2r5

  13. #48253
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit Teemo Nudes View Post
    New image leaked of a dragonized gnome and dwarves in the new player housing.
    Now we all can finally play mamma pappa barn.

    https://imgur.com/a/9LJO2r5
    Good one. lol

  14. #48254
    Quote Originally Posted by Explicit Teemo Nudes View Post
    New image leaked of a dragonized gnome and dwarves in the new player housing.
    Now we all can finally play mamma pappa barn.

    https://imgur.com/a/9LJO2r5
    Lets hope the expansion ends on a better note than that show did.

  15. #48255
    I am Murloc! Wangming's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Not Azeroth
    Posts
    5,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Rathwell View Post
    In the same way that Metamorphosis forms also wear "armor"

    Maybe THIS is Evoker. And Dracthyr is the one that has not been shown, ever.

  16. #48256
    I am Murloc! MCMLXXXII's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Delta swamp of the west
    Posts
    5,332
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    Except it isn't a minor one. We have three races that utilize the concept, two faction leaders that are Tinkers, a WC3 and HotS hero who are Tinkers, and multiple areas in Warcraft lore that revolve around the concept.

    Also please don't put words in my mouth. I didn't say Blizzard is taking a huge risk by ONLY not implementing Tinkers, I said they would be taking a huge risk implementing unknown race and class concepts over KNOWN and demanded for race and class concepts. The Tinker isn't the only item included in that.
    Not just the Tinker, you're right. Any of your class concepts because only you know what Blizzard is going to add, only to be disappointed again.

    Like I said, three named NPC's are a minor presence.

    But I'll stop this discussion. Only engaged with you to get the page count up.

    And considering none of your concepts are being added, this is getting off topic.

  17. #48257
    Quote Originally Posted by Wangming View Post
    Maybe THIS is Evoker. And Dracthyr is the one that has not been shown, ever.
    now that would be a twist

  18. #48258
    Banned Teriz's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Undermine
    Posts
    31,749
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonsworn 4 Lyfe View Post
    tinkers cannibalize shamans and DHs

    but then again DH was an impossible class as well
    Nah, Tinkers don't share any abilities or concepts with either of those classes.

    And DHs were impossible until Warlocks lost Metamorphosis. I doubt Blizzard wants to repeat that mistake by bringing out a class that begins removing abilities from the Mage and Druid classes.

  19. #48259
    I am Murloc! Wangming's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Not Azeroth
    Posts
    5,389
    Quote Originally Posted by Yarathir View Post
    Same. And also Ny'alotha for me, and N'zoth as a whole, really.
    And Nazjatar.

  20. #48260
    Quote Originally Posted by Wangming View Post
    Maybe THIS is Evoker. And Dracthyr is the one that has not been shown, ever.
    the good ending

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •