Dragonflight Alpha/Beta General Discussion

[Dracullus]

Thanks for the usual, pre-alpha "this expansion will fail".

1. Excited for new reveal.
2. I expected nothing, still dissapointed.
3. This thing that earned millions $ is total failure and that's a FACT.
4. But I'm excited for new reveal.

They announced Dragonflight two months ago. We haven't gotten any piece of serious new information since then. The player is not to blame for their terrible communication regarding the upcoming expansion. There's a difference between suspense and apathy and we already crossed the line between the two.

Yes, Blizzard seriously fucked up here. In every single expansion we had (SERIOUS) news every week after reveal. For example Legion, we had reveal on Gamescom 8/6/15 and next (SERIOUS) piece of information just few days later on Blizzcon 11/6/15.

[Sondrelk]

I guess it's more about the cadence than the content itself? If we ignore that Shadowlands had an entire tier less (and a terrible cadence), BfA was pretty close to the Legion-schedule yet with delays.

But that isnt content. That is just a better, more even spread of content to make droughts more bearable.

[8bithamster]

That's not really true so as there's a huge difference between "best" and "good enough for dungeons". The amount of Champion Points you need to do any kind of content besides maybe the hardest timed raids is very low. And for the gear cap of 160 CP you barely need half a day of playtime. Champion Points at least are a system that gives your entire account an ongoing progression. That's something WoW desperately needs. If we had one, they wouldn't have started doing the borrowed power crap back in Legion.

- - - Updated - - -



Is it so hard to grasp? If they would just extend the talent tree to not come to a halt at max level but have a small max level talent tree at the bottom where you can earn - I don't know - 5 more talent points that are exclusively spent in the bottom section - yes, I want that. And this can easily carry over into the next expansion by just turning some of those talents into new nodes while leveling up... I mean it's as easy as it could be and you still have progression at max level.

- - - Updated - - -



See comment above.

And yes, GW2 and ESO are pretty much praised for their horizontal approach - sure, they get negativity for that as well (and in some parts rightfully so), but they do something right where WoW fails (by not having something similar at all).

I dislike that there is no gear progression in GW2 or ESO because they "capped" the gear at a respective level and went with it. And then introduced stuff like Mythics (ESO) or Ascended (GW2) to still spice things up, but the gear treadmill is missing. I hate that it's every 6 months in WoW, but to have a game like ESO or GW2 where you wear your gear for 4-5 years feels quite boring.

- - - Updated - - -



Don't know what you mean. WoW basically copies GW2 flying system in Dragonflight. They already pretty much adapted to the GW2 system of scaling the world / content and the horizontal progression is there as well. Don't know what it has to do with "fans" when it's just a very basic observation.

- - - Updated - - -



1) Not true. You can access it very early by just buying the expansion.

2) Not true either.

3) Has barely been the case. Sometimes it is, most times it's not.

- - - Updated - - -



Dragonriding in Dragonflight is basically a 100% copy of GW2's flying. Doesn't mean GW2 invented it, but it couldn't be more obvious were Blizzard is copying Dragonriding from.

- - - Updated - - -



Baffles me why people are acting like March 2023 wasn't the natural release date for this expansion from the moment we got the announcement and the clarification about SL season 4. It was always Q1/23.

You do realise.. that GW2 copied it right? right?! or are you that ignorant?

[Nyel]

But that isnt content. That is just a better, more even spread of content to make droughts more bearable.

While it might not be more content in general, it feels like more because it's timed better.

- - - Updated - - -

You do realise.. that GW2 copied it right? right?! or are you that ignorant?

I mean you even quoted that, but unfortunately didn't grasp what I was saying.

Doesn't mean GW2 invented it

- - - Updated - - -

1. Excited for new reveal.
2. I expected nothing, still dissapointed.
3. This thing that earned millions $ is total failure and that's a FACT.
4. But I'm excited for new reveal.

I am 100% sure even you have been - even if it's just a little bit - disappointed by the Dragonflight announcement because you've been overly critical about Shadowlands as well and expected more than what we're about to get.

[Sondrelk]

Based on what we know and what they have announced?

So you think because Dragonflight follows the terribly received Shadowlands it will already be seen as a hit? That didn't work out for Shadowlands either, did it?

Yes, WoW needs an expansion that's back to the core. But that doesn't mean that "less" is more overall and that seems to be their approach in Dragonflight.

I think Dragonflight will be a hit because it focuses on much needed stuff like a Talent tree revamp. A flying Revamp. A more grounded, personal story. A better approach to instanced PvE content than before. A general approach to designing the game that focuses on evergreen improvements rather than temporary bandaids or gimmicks etc.

And even with the less thing. How do you even know that for certain? Sure we don't have a big setpiece piece of content like Torghast, but that doesnt mean the developers are leaving a black hole of content where it used to be, it more likely means they spread that effort into other bits of the game, like Dragonriding mecahnics and challenges.

And of course. The developers specifically stated endgame specific content being available in one of the zones. It's not like the Suramar illusion mechanic, or the accompanying withered training was showcased front and center on the gameplay trailer.

[8bithamster]

While it might not be more content in general, it feels like more because it's timed better.

- - - Updated - - -



I mean you even quoted that, but unfortunately didn't grasp what I was saying.

Doesn't mean GW2 invented it

- - - Updated - - -



I am 100% sure even you have been - even if it's just a little bit - disappointed by the Dragonflight announcement because you've been overly critical about Shadowlands as well and expected more than what we're about to get.

So.. you whinge about Dragonflight "Copying GW2", but when GW2 does it, it's fine.. yikes

Fanboys will be fanboying

[Nyel]

And even with the less thing. How do you even know that for certain?

Okay, I don't know that, to be fair. But neither do you or anyone else.

Again, that's Blizzard's fault for not keeping us up to date and leaving us in limbo for two months now.

- - - Updated - - -

So.. you whinge about Dragonflight "Copying GW2", but when GW2 does it, it's fine.. yikes

Fanboys will be fanboying

Guild Wars 2 didn't copy 100% of its mount system from another game lol. Show me a game where there's a siege turtle, a jumping bunny, a roller beetle - please, show me the games GW2 did copy all of that stuff from.

Whereas with Dragonriding it's completely clear that the WoW devs just copied the GW2 system. Heck there are comparison videos on YouTube and Dragonriding is identical to GW2 flying. Everything is the same. This has nothing to do with fanboying, it's a fact.

[Dracullus]

I am 100% sure even you have been - even if it's just a little bit - disappointed by the Dragonflight announcement because you've been overly critical about Shadowlands as well and expected more than what we're about to get.

This may blow your mind, but world isn't black&white for everyone. There are things in SL that were done best in whole series, there are things done worst, most is in between. But even that has nothing to do with SL being success or not, because selling most PC boxes on launch clearly was success no matter how you try to paint it.

[SunspotAnims]

They announced Dragonflight two months ago. We haven't gotten any piece of serious new information since then. The player is not to blame for their terrible communication regarding the upcoming expansion. There's a difference between suspense and apathy and we already crossed the line between the two.

I did say it was fine to take that stance, didn't I? I don't disagree that the ball is entirely in Blizzard's court to make a standout expansion; my point was that if we're going to be comparing DF to Legion then we should be cognizant of what Legion looked like when it was announced in comparison to how it was at release and at least acknowledge that there is more to the quality of an expansion than the number of hardline features that you can list off in a trailer.

[Aeluron Lightsong]

This may blow your mind, but world isn't black&white for everyone. There are things in SL that were done best in whole series, there are things done worst, most is in between. But even that has nothing to do with SL being success or not, because selling most PC boxes on launch clearly was success no matter how you try to paint it.

I don't know why you bother he's been negative for like ever. Its exhausting and must be miserable.

[Dracullus]

I did say it was fine to take that stance, didn't I? I don't disagree that the ball is entirely in Blizzard's court to make a standout expansion; my point was that if we're going to be comparing DF to Legion then we should be cognizant of what Legion looked like when it was announced in comparison to how it was at release and at least acknowledge that there is more to the quality of an expansion than the number of hardline features that you can list off in a trailer.

Legion was just hour presentation like DF, then 3 months of almost full radio silence about expac (at some point we learned about all weapons, but that was close to Blizzcon if I remember correctly). Difference was that in Legion reveal they talked more about story, few dungeons and DH (but we learned about stuff like M+, world quests, transmog tab months later), in DF they rather focused on systems and zones were presented with more details.

This time we won't have Blizzcon materials, but Alpha would launch months before that anyway.

[Makorus]

Okay, I don't know that, to be fair. But neither do you or anyone else.

Again, that's Blizzard's fault for not keeping us up to date and leaving us in limbo for two months now.

- - - Updated - - -



Guild Wars 2 didn't copy 100% of its mount system from another game lol. Show me a game where there's a siege turtle, a jumping bunny, a roller beetle - please, show me the games GW2 did copy all of that stuff from.

Whereas with Dragonriding it's completely clear that the WoW devs just copied the GW2 system. Heck there are comparison videos on YouTube and Dragonriding is identical to GW2 flying. Everything is the same. This has nothing to do with fanboying, it's a fact.

The Griffon is just wingsuits, found in a lot of game, the most recent and big budget one before PoF being Just Cause 3. Springer is jump high, Raptor is jump far, Skimmer is jump water. Warclaw is PvP. Jackal, I suppose, I can't really think of anything that's close to it, and while Roller Beetle is clearly inspired by arcade racing games, it's unique enough.

Skyscale is just a WoW Flying mount.

Outside of the Jackal (which is nigh useless anyway outside of Puzzles) and the Roller Beetle, the mounts are hardly unique. Sure, they are unique to MMOs, but they are hardly unique concept that took them a ton of time to think of. You act like it's the highlight of design in the MMO genre.

[Nyel]

Outside of the Jackal (which is nigh useless anyway outside of Puzzles) and the Roller Beetle, the mounts are hardly unique. Sure, they are unique to MMOs, but they are hardly unique concept that took them a ton of time to think of. You act like it's the highlight of design in the MMO genre.

Never said that. It's just the best mount system in any MMORPG and that's the important thing in this comparison. No MMORPG does it better. They are unique to MMORPGs, especially with this diversity and the world designed in favor of them. And there's really no reason to pit an MMORPG against single player offline RPGs, free-roaming action games or whatever. The good thing is, Blizzard copies in this game from the best.

[Makorus]

Never said that. It's just the best mount system in any MMORPG and that's the important thing in this comparison. No MMORPG does it better. They are unique to MMORPGs, especially with this diversity and the world designed in favor of them. And there's really no reason to pit an MMORPG against single player offline RPGs, free-roaming action games or whatever. The good thing is, Blizzard copies in this game from the best.

It's the best mount system because it's the only mount system that's different.

And the way it is implemented is really, really shoddy, as seen by the VERY awkward implementation in EoD.

[Lady Atia]

Based on what? Your wholly objective gut feeling?
Legion was a smash hit because it was fan service heavy, but more importantly because it came off WoD, the most anemic expansion the game has had, shortest one as well.

You know what else WoW is in dire need of? An expansion that focuses on core systems instead of chasing the hype endlessly.

You know what I never understood - the "internets" hate against fanservice. What's wrong with that?

[micwini]

Why anyone would enjoy the chaos of something. Seems kinda messed up, I dunno I'm not one to enjoy seeing people have a rough time.

Its called trolling. But reporting doesn't work unfortunately and people calling it out will get infracted for that. Just watch.

[8bithamster]

Never said that. It's just the best mount system in any MMORPG and that's the important thing in this comparison. No MMORPG does it better. They are unique to MMORPGs, especially with this diversity and the world designed in favor of them. And there's really no reason to pit an MMORPG against single player offline RPGs, free-roaming action games or whatever. The good thing is, Blizzard copies in this game from the best.

No you said gw2 invented it. You got proven wrong and now move the goal post. Again... I'm done, enjoy your game. Let us enjoy ours OK?

[Makorus]

You know what I never understood - the "internets" hate against fanservice. What's wrong with that?

Fanservice can easily be used instead of actual interesting writing or interesting new characters. Often times, fanservice makes people overlook shoddy writing because there's characters involved that they like

It's nostalgia-baiting. And Legion was really bad in that regard.

[Sondrelk]

You know what I never understood - the "internets" hate against fanservice. What's wrong with that?

There is nothing inherently wrong with it, but it does usually end up replacing actual effort when its easier to instead coast on what is already proven. We see this often is modern culture where easy fanservice is used to mask mediocre or even subpar films.

[rhorle]

Fanservice can easily be used instead of actual interesting writing or interesting new characters. Often times, fanservice makes people overlook shoddy writing because there's characters involved that they like. It's nostalgia-baiting. And Legion was really bad in that regard.

WoW has always had shoddy writting. Not much has changed in that regard even with Legion or WoD targeting nostalgia. The difference is just a person being unable to recognize that their feelings on the franchise have changed and needing to blame an outside force for that change.