Dragonflight Alpha/Beta General Discussion

[Catastrophy349]

Can we get back to lore? Please? Yo. Every action has its equal, opposite reaction. The expansion before shat the bed, I loved Sylvanas, but she’s in traction. Poor Anduin Wrynn, he is missing in action. So now we’re left with, Tyrande Whisperwind, with her own faction.

[Niwes]

Yes? Specs that are considered awful in the meta will struggle to find groups for anything.

this is the simple truth.

and while there will be always a spec on top (even doing 0.005% more dps) and a spec on the bottom (even when doing 0.005% les dps), balance is important, when it comes down to a specific overall picture.

an example: i play on 2,5-2,8k rating in m+ pugs at the moment. survival hunters and outlaw rogues do around 5% more dps in m+ these days than everyone else. coincidentally (for completely different reasons, BfA style stuff) i play hunter and rogue this xpac. and i had zero problems getting into every m+ dungeon as BM hunter (the worst hunter spec at the moment). also i have zero problems to get into every dungeon as Sub Rogue at the moment.

in contrast, when you played a non-meta spec in the past, that had 10% less dps, no one takes you into account. ferals, shadow priests, rets. all of them have/had fukin hard times in pug m+ playing.

why i showed that 2 examples: i wanna show that the amount of (missing) balance matters. wow ppls are not that stupid that they are going „you are not meta, we dont want you“, when meta does 2-3% more dps. but they are also realizing, when a spec does 10% less than average, is not designed for some specific game niche, or not brings anything to the table, they take the other specs.

summary: balance don’t matter to a 1-2% degree. and balance don’t matter for „everyone is just playing meta cause of 1-2% and all other specs suck“. but balance DOES matter, when specs falling 10% behind, are not designed for a specific game niche at all, or bring nothing to the table. so yes, balance matters (to a specific degree)!

[Nymrohd]

summary: the changes counters directly, what made pug m+ attractive (or way more attractive than pug raiding) to me and others. and therefore i don’t like it. even when i have in general the same opinion as quoted poster.

I think there are solutions to this, they just require a lot more effort from Blizzard.


First, OpenRaid should have been part of the game UI. PuGing a raid is not in any way elegant and while someone can on the fly spend 30-40 minutes in an activity, many people need to schedule for 3-4 hours. Wasting far more than that to build the raid is horrible. Having a tool to schedule a raid ahead of time to a time that suits you so that when the time comes you can have the group ready within 10-15 minutes would get so many more people involved.

Second, raid design should help make raids easier to experience in smaller and distinct chunks. LFR does this already for the raids; you can pick a specific part with specific bosses, there is usually a capstone in rewards at the end (LFR wing endbosses corresponding to tier bosses). This should be something easier to schedule and communicate for PuG leaders and it seems the reward system in DF is built for that; e.g. less running Castle Nathria, more running Leeching Vaults.

Third and alternatively, design more and smaller raids. Instead of one raid with 10-12 bosses, two raids with 4-6 bosses (and a third with 1-2). Give us similar number of encounters but more environments. Less bosses who are filler in the story. Yes, probably would mean more art reuse but as long as each tier has some new art, the World art already is strong enough to carry themes and raids.

[huth]

i have learned they are simply here to stir the pot
you could prove 1+1=2 and they would still argue for it being 35

More like 1+1=Blizzard bad, no matter how nonsensical that is.

[TheramoreIsTheBomb]

Do we know if the 28 Nov release date is Sunday -> Monday at midnight, or Monday -> Tuesday?

Also do we know if it's a global launch? Trying to plan things out.

Nvm found an article. It's midnight between Monday and Tuesday if you're in Sweden like me.

2/3pm PDT and 5/6pm EST iirc.

[Forum Man]

I know that because doesn't have a working work orders system but it seems like the gear economy will go like this

If you have the mats but not the profession you'll use a work order and pay less than AH prices
If you don't have mats just gold then you'll use the AH
If you want high grade BoP gear you'll go work orders likely to your buddy

The recrafting option also allows crafters to keep the gear relevant like if the raider just wanted a mythic sword they don't care it's quality 1 and later recraft it at a slightly higher cost

- - - Updated - - -

2/3pm PDT and 5/6pm EST iirc.

Mid day for me which is perfect
My meal is already planned

[Xilurm]

Honestly for me this ruins the immersion so much. I tend to take time off when expacs launch yet I never rush. I'll walk if the NPCs walk, read everything, check every interactible and ofc I want to listen to dialogue. And it just messes up immersion so much.

Same. So annoying when an NPC hasn't finished their line and another starts talking. I don't care if I have to wait a second or two, I'd do it if meant a more smooth process.

[Aucald]

Btw I keep reporting these because they are all over the place, they go live as they are far too often and they ruin any sense of immersion while questing.
The majority of voiced discussions I've seen so far have fucked up timing with the NPCs constantly talking over each other. If you encounter them, please report them as well. Seriously I'd rather have slightly akward pauses than whatever this is and I don't even get how they can be that poorly hooked in the first place. Like, basic addition?

I noticed a lot of this in the Ohn'ahran Plains quests, especially in and around the Maruuk hub in the rough center of the zone. So far I've encountered very little of it in the Azure Span, though; so perhaps they've fixed a majority of the scripting issues regarding spoken dialogue. I'd have to go back through Ohn'ahran Plains to check. I do report them when I encounter them, though.

[Marlamin]

Honestly for me this ruins the immersion so much. I tend to take time off when expacs launch yet I never rush. I'll walk if the NPCs walk, read everything, check every interactible and ofc I want to listen to dialogue. And it just messes up immersion so much.

This is one of my major gripes with WoW's in-game VO. I wonder if it is because they don't have the voice-overs implemented when they actually make the conversations or because the durations differ per localized conversation (or a combination of both). Seems to be a hard problem for them that they've been having forever.

[Nymrohd]

This is one of my major gripes with WoW's in-game VO. I wonder if it is because they don't have the voice-overs implemented when they actually make the conversations or because the durations differ per localized conversation (or a combination of both). Seems to be a hard problem for them that they've been having forever.

I honestly wonder why it at least seems to be individual strings/files being called instead of just mixing it in a conversation.

[Aeluron Lightsong]

Remind me to stay in a thread like this to not lose my sanity over this....damn game.


Edit: I spel gud.

[Bsirk]

My Dragonriding mounts disappeared again.

I think that happens when you copy a character over to th beta servers from live. I believe the only way to get them back is to do the story up until you unlock Dragon riding.

[Arkura]

Ive been looking at most dps classes and how they play and I have to say that I'm getting more and more hyped for DF simply because it looks more like you could play anything and it would work out well. Many specs flow well. (I havent looked at ret though)

But unholy, frost dk, ww monk, arcane mage, fire mage, enhance sham looks fun to play. Its so hars to figure out what to main now Thats such a good thing for this game. And I still havent looked at all specs yet.

[Makorus]

Oh yeah we surely need score site integration like openraid in the game just to make meritocracy matter even more. Oh and yes, more raids surely will adress all those that want engaging world- or solo content with gearing progression.

I do not really wonder about the state of the game if blindness like that is far spread, even among the developers. I do not really wonder about millions of players leaving if they are not being adressed because of celebrated stupidity derived from bias and "metrics" based on bias.

I mean.. why won't the devs simply rename WoW into DRoW? Dungeons and Raids of Warcraft. Because the world is literally dead. And we know what the devs focus on. And it surely is not immersion and the world, but raids and dungeons.

It's funny how you talk about "game blindness" without realizing that tieing amazing rewards to braindead open world content will kill the game so quickly, you wouldn't even get to a second content patch.

[Nymrohd]

I think that happens when you copy a character over to th beta servers from live. I believe the only way to get them back is to do the story up until you unlock Dragon riding.

That's what causes it? Damn. Well I am not sure I want to do the starting experience AGAIN though . ..

[huth]

That's what causes it? Damn. Well I am not sure I want to do the starting experience AGAIN though . ..

The mounts are tied to achievements, and copying characters over overwrites them.

[huth]

I propose to turn world content into not being braindead, but to offer proper progression.

Can't do that because everybody must be able to handle world content, even you.

[Forum Man]

Can't do that because everybody must be able to handle world content, even you.

That's why they had to nerf the disc priest artifact intro
Same reason they gave lfr determination stacks and started removing mechanics

They can't make content designed to be cleared by everyone have a chance of failure and the difficult content of the past like mage tower was complained about because it was too hard even after you could outgeae it

It's just something blizz can't win at

[huth]

Sure they could, if there were different difficulties. But just ignore the arguments brought up. You are in good company doing that.

Because you have yet to present a mechanism by which to actually do that. All you do is magic thinking.

[Makorus]

Sure you can do it, if you have multiple difficulties, and the lowest difficulty is what we got today. A progression path in the open world would be you would either need gear from difficulty 1 to master difficulty 2 or you would have skill enough to play difficulty 2 from start.

And hey, nice ad hominem.

Just look at Guild Wars 2 and the effect of having slightly challenging Open World Content.

Dragons End is what would happen to WoW if you had world bosses with more complexity than "move out of circles sometimes and it doesn't really matter if 80% of the players are dead".