1. #17961
    Quote Originally Posted by Marlamin View Post
    Been working on looking at things again these last two days, haven't found much (except for a small connection that might be posted later) but all these fake leaks are fueling the amount of effort I put into these kind of puzzles. Guess they're good for something after all!

    What's that small connection?

  2. #17962
    10.0: Rage of the Dragons

    New continent: Dragon isles
    2 max level zones expanded through patches with leveling zones being zidormii old zones including
    Hyjal
    Dragonblight
    Caverns of Time
    Twilight Highlands


    Threats include
    Nightmare dragons
    Return of galakrond
    Infinite dragons
    Return of chromatus

    New class: Dragonsworn
    4 specs
    Trained by Wrathion as a vanguard to replace the weakened aspects the intro takes place throughout multiple points in time from Cata to SL where you meet the “Hero” throughout it

    Black dragon abilities as a base
    4 flight abilities for specs
    Blue/red are ranged and melee
    Green is healer
    Bronze is tank

    New pledge system is used to give players a feeling of artifact weapons as they level with generic bonuses every other level and class specific every 5

    Level cap 70 with a long awaited talent row

  3. #17963
    I still can't see why Blizzard would undo the main benefit of squishing the number of levels back to 60 by immediately making the new max level 70 the next expansion. Especially since this would logically mean new players would need to go through Shadowlands content to get to max level after hitting level 50.
    Seems to me like the easier way to go forward is to place Shadowlands content into the same Chromie time framework as the other expansions, and then make the next expansions levelling the same 50-60 we had In this expansion.
    The world revamp dream will never die!

  4. #17964
    Quote Originally Posted by Sondrelk View Post
    I still can't see why Blizzard would undo the main benefit of squishing the number of levels back to 60 by immediately making the new max level 70 the next expansion. Especially since this would logically mean new players would need to go through Shadowlands content to get to max level after hitting level 50.
    Seems to me like the easier way to go forward is to place Shadowlands content into the same Chromie time framework as the other expansions, and then make the next expansions levelling the same 50-60 we had In this expansion.
    a.) having the re-squish the levels every ten years is probably the plan. Ten years is a lot of time. Or perhaps they realize they don't need to do 10 levels every expansion. A new expansion could just be level 60 to 61 & it wouldn't be any different.
    b.) you're forgetting the *detect your personal journey & tailor the quest to it* part of Bastion. Shadowlands was based on you have doing timewalking before it.
    c.) they might change their minds after getting feedback but clearly Danuser is super proud of BFA & Shadowlands & they were super-amped to force new players to play through both before whatever comes in 10.0. I would have said typically the consequences of the previous expansion sets up the premise of the next expansion, but that doesn't seem to be the case for 10.0

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by zantheus1993 View Post
    10.0: Rage of the Dragons
    While I'm all for a dragon class, who's humanoid form can be any race of your choosing: Why does everyone suggest it would be named some new dragon term, like "Dragonsworn" or "Dragon Knight." Wouldn't the class name be an already existing term, like "Dragonflight" or "Dragon Aspect"

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by MyWholeLifeIsThunder View Post
    Wait I just rewatched this and I really can't find anything that says that Lordaeron city has been rebuilt, am I missing something? Or are you talking about the Tirisfal Glades as a whole? AFAIK, the eastern part including Deathkneel and Calson State was never damaged in the alliance siege or by the blight, so they have remained forsaken holdings all along.
    canonically nobody actually lived in the city or the undercity. They lived in Brill.
    Last edited by Ersula; 2022-01-15 at 05:03 PM.

  5. #17965
    Over 9000! Makabreska's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Streets Strange by Moonlight
    Posts
    9,439
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    a.)While I'm all for a dragon class, who's humanoid form can be any race of your choosing: Why does everyone suggest it would be named some new dragon term, like "Dragonsworn" or "Dragon Knight." Wouldn't the class name be an already existing term, like "Dragonflight" or "Dragon Aspect"
    No, because these names already mean something different. Dragonflight is a general term for all dragon kind of certain color and Aspects are their leaders. It's kinda obvious.
    Last edited by Makabreska; 2022-01-15 at 05:37 PM.
    Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.

  6. #17966
    Quote Originally Posted by Sondrelk View Post
    I still can't see why Blizzard would undo the main benefit of squishing the number of levels back to 60 by immediately making the new max level 70 the next expansion. Especially since this would logically mean new players would need to go through Shadowlands content to get to max level after hitting level 50.
    Seems to me like the easier way to go forward is to place Shadowlands content into the same Chromie time framework as the other expansions, and then make the next expansions levelling the same 50-60 we had In this expansion.
    What your advocating isn't squishing though. That would just be flat out reverting everyone's level to 50 which would cause hysteria.

    As for new players, they will undoubtedly have to go through Shadowlands after BfA. Although I imagine it will be significantly sped up. The point of re-doing the starting experience for new players was just to modernize it so they didn't have to get funneled through 15 year old content.

  7. #17967
    Quote Originally Posted by cantrip View Post
    What 10.0 will be about:

    - another borrowed power system(s)
    - another 5 leveling areas
    - another final raid
    - another set of dungeons

    what 10.0 will not be about

    - systems that matter
    - rewards outside of raids, dungeons and pvp that matter for character progression
    - fun open world content
    - fair pvp
    - a good crafting system with progression from world content, without the need to play "everything"
    - a focus on what players want (narrow progression pathes instead of "play-it-all")
    - no raid focus
    I can just guarantee you one thing 10.0 won't contain: a world revamp.
    MAGA - Make Alliance Great Again

  8. #17968
    High Overlord uzira's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    166
    Quote Originally Posted by Nyel View Post
    I can just guarantee you one thing 10.0 won't contain: a world revamp.
    Do u know someone who works at blizzard?

  9. #17969
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    a.) having the re-squish the levels every ten years is probably the plan. Ten years is a lot of time. Or perhaps they realize they don't need to do 10 levels every expansion. A new expansion could just be level 60 to 61 & it wouldn't be any different.
    b.) you're forgetting the *detect your personal journey & tailor the quest to it* part of Bastion. Shadowlands was based on you have doing timewalking before it.
    c.) they might change their minds after getting feedback but clearly Danuser is super proud of BFA & Shadowlands & they were super-amped to force new players to play through both before whatever comes in 10.0. I would have said typically the consequences of the previous expansion sets up the premise of the next expansion, but that doesn't seem to be the case for 10.0

    - - - Updated - - -


    While I'm all for a dragon class, who's humanoid form can be any race of your choosing: Why does everyone suggest it would be named some new dragon term, like "Dragonsworn" or "Dragon Knight." Wouldn't the class name be an already existing term, like "Dragonflight" or "Dragon Aspect".
    Because dragonsworn is already a title in the game

    I don’t see a dragon model being used but maybe drakonid in a similar fashion to meta for DH

    Some people don’t understand what the difference between a class and a race is anymore

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by uzira View Post
    Do u know someone who works at blizzard?
    A world revamp is something that they literally never have to do now because of phasing tech

  10. #17970
    Quote Originally Posted by uzira View Post
    Do u know someone who works at blizzard?
    No, but I have a realistic view on the last years of WoW's development and the company Blizzard is / has become.
    MAGA - Make Alliance Great Again

  11. #17971
    Quote Originally Posted by Sondrelk View Post
    I still can't see why Blizzard would undo the main benefit of squishing the number of levels back to 60 by immediately making the new max level 70 the next expansion. Especially since this would logically mean new players would need to go through Shadowlands content to get to max level after hitting level 50.
    Seems to me like the easier way to go forward is to place Shadowlands content into the same Chromie time framework as the other expansions, and then make the next expansions levelling the same 50-60 we had In this expansion.
    Iirc they said that leveling would require the previous expansion only for new players then it would be the new content

    So if I started in 10.0 I would just have to do SL content for 1-60 which personally is pretty good because you get tossed so many side quests and rares that you hit 60 currently before you even finish the story

  12. #17972
    Quote Originally Posted by zantheus1993 View Post
    Some people don’t understand what the difference between a class and a race is anymore
    But dragons make more sense as a class than a race, from a gameplay perspective, because they have a humanoid form. Your "race" is your disguise. I know size is an issue, perhaps they only turn into their dragon form, in flight, during a cd: Much like priest's spirit of redemption. Canonically, Drakonoids, Drakes & Dragonsworn can't turn into the humanoid races.

  13. #17973
    Quote Originally Posted by Ersula View Post
    But dragons make more sense as a class than a race, from a gameplay perspective, because they have a humanoid form. Your "race" is your disguise. I know size is an issue, perhaps they only turn into their dragon form, in flight, during a cd: Much like priest's spirit of redemption. Canonically, Drakonoids, Drakes & Dragonsworn can't turn into the humanoid races.
    Because dragons are a race and would work better as a worgen style race that has the dragon form as a mount

    We have mortals who have been gifted powers from dragons and other sources granting them power which is a majority of the classes

    If you want a transformation then it’s more likely to be a drakonid style because canonically they are the results of dragons and mortals supposedly the first dragonsworn and it would be similar to the demon hunter

  14. #17974
    Immortal Shadochi's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    The Shit Throne
    Posts
    7,820
    Quote Originally Posted by Marlamin View Post
    Been working on looking at things again these last two days, haven't found much (except for a small connection that might be posted later) but all these fake leaks are fueling the amount of effort I put into these kind of puzzles. Guess they're good for something after all!

    Feels good coming back from a hiatus and one of the recent posts I see in this thread being from the parrot himself
    #1 Hype-Thread Shitposter - Overlord of the Hypethread

  15. #17975
    Quote Originally Posted by Black Rider View Post
    What's that small connection?
    https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads...t-Pet-Wearable

    Basically, the "drakemountemerald" buff I posted about many many pages ago seems to be connected to the things encrypted under that key and is very similar to how the Shadowlands Deluxe bundle was encrypted. Nothing is certain due to encryption, but signs point to that being the 10.0 Deluxe shop bundle.

    I'm still looking at things but not sure there's much more to find. Keeping at it, though!
    Last edited by Marlamin; 2022-01-15 at 07:17 PM.

  16. #17976
    The Undying Slowpoke is a Gamer's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    World of Wisconsin
    Posts
    37,283
    And here.... we.... go.

    Drakemountemerald buff, and something sharing 34 animations with Vulpera Male.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Also much as I'd hate to say it after Blizz talked about "grounded" seeing Emerald Drake Mount screams "WoW: Lifelands."
    FFXIV - Maduin (Dynamis DC)

  17. #17977
    Soft confirmation of Dragon Isles. I don't give two shits about Dragons, but the last Dragon expansion had a horrible main plot and a solid side-story in terms of worldbuilding and old world advancement, while having meh gameplay. Hopefully the new one keeps the first part, but not the second. Then again it'd be hard to top Dragon Soul in terms of worst end raid.
    Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.

    Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
    Quote Originally Posted by A Young Super Dickmann
    [9.2] won't be [DF's] last major patch, I have seen it... If it is I'll write pro-Calia fanfiction.

  18. #17978
    The Undying Slowpoke is a Gamer's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    World of Wisconsin
    Posts
    37,283
    Quote Originally Posted by Super Dickmann View Post
    Soft confirmation of Dragon Isles. I don't give two shits about Dragons, but the last Dragon expansion had a horrible main plot and a solid side-story in terms of worldbuilding and old world advancement, while having meh gameplay. Hopefully the new one keeps the first part, but not the second. Then again it'd be hard to top Dragon Soul in terms of worst end raid.
    If it were just a dragon I'd say Dragon Isles. But it indicates Emerald, AKA Emerald Dream, AKA Life.

    Combined with all the Elune stuff we've gotten through the shop lately.

    It's Lifelands, "grounded" was a lie.
    FFXIV - Maduin (Dynamis DC)

  19. #17979
    Quote Originally Posted by Slowpoke is a Gamer View Post
    If it were just a dragon I'd say Dragon Isles. But it indicates Emerald, AKA Emerald Dream, AKA Life.

    Combined with all the Elune stuff we've gotten through the shop lately.

    It's Lifelands, "grounded" was a lie.
    Applying that logic would leave you with the conclusion that Legion or BFA's early zones were ungrounded because of new nightmare or faceless model strings.
    Dickmann's Law: As a discussion on the Lore forums becomes longer, the probability of the topic derailing to become about Sylvanas approaches 1.

    Tinkers will be the next Class confirmed.
    Quote Originally Posted by A Young Super Dickmann
    [9.2] won't be [DF's] last major patch, I have seen it... If it is I'll write pro-Calia fanfiction.

  20. #17980
    Quote Originally Posted by zantheus1993 View Post
    Iirc they said that leveling would require the previous expansion only for new players then it would be the new content

    So if I started in 10.0 I would just have to do SL content for 1-60 which personally is pretty good because you get tossed so many side quests and rares that you hit 60 currently before you even finish the story
    While that is an option I feel reverting levels to 50 again feels like a better option, mostly because it removes the strict requirement to justify another 10 levels of stuff, which is exactly the reason we had the squish to begin with, levels being meaningless as individual ones meant nothing for player power.

    If the reason to go to level 70 is just to prevent complaints of losing levels then I think the complaints of Shadowlands being faster to level through after 10.0 releases would be about the same, so on a sense it's down to which option Blizzard wants to go for.
    The world revamp dream will never die!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •