1. #13041
    Quote Originally Posted by MuH sTaTe LiNeS View Post
    biden is such a strong and competent president that Putin decided to wait till he was in office to invade the Ukraine instead of doing it while his alleged lapdog was still president. Totally makes sense biden is too afraid to even sanction Putin and avoided the question all together. Such a strong leader! I'm sure these new sanctions are going to be so persauvsive like the last ones were.
    How's that trucker protest in DC working out?

  2. #13042
    Legendary! Poopymonster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Neverland Ranch Survivor
    Posts
    6,562
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowferal View Post
    How's that trucker protest in DC working out?
    It was literally that. "A trucker protest", few other vehicles may have been involved and promptly got lost.
    From what I've heard the only actual trucker gave a word salad when interviewed then fucked off home already.

    It was mentioned here.
    Quote Originally Posted by Crissi View Post
    Quit using other posters as levels of crazy. That is not ok

  3. #13043
    Quote Originally Posted by TexasRules View Post
    So strong that when asked why he would not put sanctions on Putin, he ignored the question. So strong that he did not put these sanctions on Russia last month to deter this war. Instead he waited until after the invasion to do”stronger sanctions”. But he’s stronger against Putin….he’s just not going to sanction him directly. Because he’s stronger
    Trump wasn't going to put sanctions on Putin at all after he tried to kill Skripal. But Congress voted overwhelmingly in favor of them, and the Republicans actually had a fucking backbone then against Putin. Now they are sucking Trump and Putin's traitorous cocks.

    Trump isn't stronger than anyone.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by MuH sTaTe LiNeS View Post
    biden is such a strong and competent president that Putin decided to wait till he was in office to invade the Ukraine instead of doing it while his alleged lapdog was still president. Totally makes sense

    biden is too afraid to even sanction Putin and avoided the question all together. Such a strong leader! I'm sure these new sanctions are going to be so persauvsive like the last ones were.
    What is it with fucking Republican traitors on this forum? More Russians are standing up to Putin than Republicans are. Jesus fucking christ.

  4. #13044
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    Trump isn't stronger than anyone.
    Excuse me, have you SEEN all those images of Trump's face photoshopped onto the 80's bods of Stallone and Schwarzenegger? Homeboy is FUCKIN RIPPED apparently!

    And needs a golf cart to travel a few hundred feet.

    Meanwhile, Biden can ride a fuckin bike. We've never seen Trump on a bike, clearly that means he can't ride a bike. Sad.

  5. #13045
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    Trump wasn't going to put sanctions on Putin at all after he tried to kill Skripal. But Congress voted overwhelmingly in favor of them, and the Republicans actually had a fucking backbone then against Putin. Now they are sucking Trump and Putin's traitorous cocks.

    Trump isn't stronger than anyone.

    - - - Updated - - -



    What is it with fucking Republican traitors on this forum? More Russians are standing up to Putin than Republicans are. Jesus fucking christ.
    I think I remember that stuff. Trump was forced to sign sanctions against Russia because it had a veto-proof majority and then just refused to enforce them.
    Since we can't call out Trolls and Bad Faith posters and the Ignore function doesn't actually ignore it. Add
    "mmo-champion.com##li.postbitignored"
    to your ublock or adblock filter to actually ignore ignored posters. Now just need a way to ignore responses to them as well.

  6. #13046
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    So why aren't Republicans in Congress drafting additional sanctions and pushing for passage?
    .
    Because Democrats rejected them in January

  7. #13047
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    75,685
    Quote Originally Posted by TexasRules View Post
    Because Democrats rejected them in January
    Sanctions over an invasion that hadn't happened yet?

    Are you smoking the good weed tonight?


  8. #13048
    Quote Originally Posted by Milchshake View Post
    “This wouldn’t have happened under Trump!” exhibit #78… circa 2016.

    This probably still would have happened under Trump, but it helps that democrats control the white house --see Putin 2008, 2014, he was given leeway after the election, well Obama said he would. Remember when he laughed at Mitt Romney for suggesting Russia was the biggest problem in the world, and the media laughed along with him.

    The problem is, Biden could have done sanctions in January, but the democrats voted them down. Now he's doing sanctions AFTER an invasion. And dodging questions on why he won't sanction Putin NOW. Why did he wait to do these"stronger sanctions"? Why is he not including energy, the basis of most of Russia's wealth? It's because Europe is dependent on Russia's energy. It's a good thing the United States is not building pipelines and handing out leases, we don't want to be energy independent either.

    Hate to say this, but this is going to embolden China to go after Taiwan.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    Sanctions over an invasion that hadn't happened yet?

    Are you smoking the good weed tonight?
    Sanctions to stop an invasion.....Are you suggesting we only do sanctions as a reaction and not a detour-ant? Are you that naive or just pretending to be stupid?

    Oh wait, you live in a country where they give their leader authoritarian powers. Leading them to confiscate people's trucks and bank accounts because of charges of counseling to commit mischief. In America, you can be a black supremacist, shoot at a Jewish mayoral candidate and get bailed out of jail by BLM for 100k. In Canada if you start a PEACEFUL protest, you get thrown in jail without bail.


    As it pertains to Biden, I leave with my quote of the day:

    Doocy asked whether the president was “confident” that the U.S. sanctions imposed on Russia Thursday would be “as devastating as Russian missiles and bullets and tanks.”

    “Yes — Russian bullets, missiles and tanks in Ukraine — yes I am,” the president responded.

  9. #13049
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    75,685
    Quote Originally Posted by TexasRules View Post
    Sanctions to stop an invasion.....Are you suggesting we only do sanctions as a reaction and not a detour-ant? Are you that naive or just pretending to be stupid?
    Pre-emptive and reactive sanctions are different things. That I can tell the difference is not "naivetee".

    Oh wait, you live in a country where they give their leader authoritarian powers. Leading them to confiscate people's trucks and bank accounts because of charges of counseling to commit mischief. In America, you can be a black supremacist, shoot at a Jewish mayoral candidate and get bailed out of jail by BLM for 100k. In Canada if you start a PEACEFUL protest, you get thrown in jail without bail.
    The convoy occupation was not a "peaceful protest".
    Our Prime Minister has no "authoritarian powers".
    Confiscation of property used in the commission of treason (or other crimes) is perfectly reasonable.
    If bail was offered to someone charged with a crime, and they pay it, that's how that's supposed to work. If you're arguing that person should not have been bailed out, take that up with the court system, not those who funded their bail payment.

    You're pushing absolute fucking nonsense. Nothing you're saying is true. You're supporting Nazis and other extremists, and pushing disinformation horseshit to muddy the waters.
    Last edited by Endus; 2022-02-25 at 04:19 AM.


  10. #13050
    Quote Originally Posted by Endus View Post
    Pre-emptive and reactive sanctions are different things. That I can tell the difference is not "naivetee".



    The convoy occupation was not a "peaceful protest".
    Our Prime Minister has no "authoritarian powers".
    Confiscation of property used in the commission of treason (or other crimes) is perfectly reasonable.

    You're pushing absolute fucking nonsense. Nothing you're saying is true.
    Saw a clip on youtube of Cucker Carlson saying all of this almost word for word. Might have been a lincoln project video, forget which tbh. Guess we know he loves the Cucker.

  11. #13051
    Over 9000! PhaelixWW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Washington (né California)
    Posts
    9,024
    Quote Originally Posted by TexasRules View Post
    Because Democrats rejected them in January
    If you think lifting sanctions is somehow responsible for the invasion of Ukraine by Russia, then you need to get your head checked out.


    "The difference between stupidity
    and genius is that genius has its limits."

    --Alexandre Dumas-fils

  12. #13052
    I Don't Work Here Endus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    75,685
    Quote Originally Posted by beanman12345 View Post
    Saw a clip on youtube of Cucker Carlson saying all of this almost word for word. Might have been a lincoln project video, forget which tbh. Guess we know he loves the Cucker.
    Speaking as someone who lives just outside fuckin' Ottawa, and is speaking from personal experience, anyone thinking these Nazi fucks were "peaceful protesters" is either lying, or so gullible they'll fall for whatever bullshit their cult leader of choice tells them.

    They were waving Nazi flags. They tried to burn down an apartment building and seal everyone inside. They were using psychological warfare tactics. They were repeatedly detonating explosive devices outside people's apartments. They demanded the overthrow of the government and that they should get to pick the new government. They were terrorists, and they were committing treason.

    https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/...ection-46.html

    Treason
    (2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
    (a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;

    Clearly covers the actions of these "protesters".

    You'll excuse me if I don't have a lot of patience for foreign extremists encouraging violent treason against my nation's democratically-elected government.


  13. #13053
    Quote Originally Posted by TexasRules View Post
    Because Democrats rejected them in January
    What sanctions in fucking January?

  14. #13054
    Quote Originally Posted by TexasRules View Post
    Because Democrats rejected them in January
    Russia hadn't invaded yet so the sanctions weren't called for. Why aren't they bringing the legislation back and seeking quick bipartisan passage?

    You act like the Republican party is incapable of governance, unintentionally. Which, amusingly, is largely correct.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by TexasRules View Post
    This probably still would have happened under Trump
    9/11 wouldn't have happened under Gore.

    See how unprovable and tacky that is?
    Last edited by Edge-; 2022-02-25 at 05:30 AM.

  15. #13055
    Over 9000! PhaelixWW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Washington (né California)
    Posts
    9,024
    Quote Originally Posted by postman1782 View Post
    What sanctions in fucking January?
    The proposed Nord Stream 2 pipeline sanctions.


    "The difference between stupidity
    and genius is that genius has its limits."

    --Alexandre Dumas-fils

  16. #13056
    The Undying Breccia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    37,965
    Quote Originally Posted by PhaelixWW View Post
    If this bill passes, it won’t make the Nord Stream pipeline any less likely. It won’t stop Russia from invading Ukraine. In fact, it will do the exact opposite. It will make the completion of Nord Stream more likely, and it will be a gift to Russia, dividing us from our European allies right at the moment when we need to be in solidarity with them in order to deter Russian aggression.
    And then Russia invaded, Germany gave the okay, and it was off to the races.

  17. #13057
    Over 9000! PhaelixWW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Washington (né California)
    Posts
    9,024
    In new redistricting news, Democrats gained more ground this week.

    A North Carolina court rejected the GoP-favored plan in favor of one by a nonpartisan committee, leading to -1 R seat and +1 D seat.

    Also, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decided to accept the map proposed by Democrats, which resulted in -1 R seat.




    "The difference between stupidity
    and genius is that genius has its limits."

    --Alexandre Dumas-fils

  18. #13058
    Quote Originally Posted by PhaelixWW View Post
    It's hilarious that you think the timing of Putin's decision to invade had anything other than to do with the fact that Ukraine was heading towards NATO membership.
    For the record, I believe there were other factors. The completion of Nord Stream. Germany still sorting out their coalition government. France being busy with their presidential election. Britain being busy with Downing Street parties. The US being buys tearing itself apart. All these would delay reactions from those governments until it is too late.

  19. #13059
    Quote Originally Posted by Flarelaine View Post
    For the record, I believe there were other factors. The completion of Nord Stream. Germany still sorting out their coalition government. France being busy with their presidential election. Britain being busy with Downing Street parties. The US being buys tearing itself apart. All these would delay reactions from those governments until it is too late.
    I think Putin is going senile you don't have to be political genius to figure the perfect time would have been under Trump during the transition of power when the US was a shit show especially after the insurrection. Trump would have bent over backwards to defend him as he is now and have the power to stall or slow NATO.

  20. #13060
    The Undying Breccia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    NY, USA
    Posts
    37,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Draco-Onis View Post
    Trump would have bent over backwards to defend him as he is now and have the power to stall or slow NATO.
    This seems solid to me. Also, I can't help but wonder, those people yelling "Why didn't Biden put sanctions on Russia before like a bigly yuge leader?" don't seem to be mentioning Trump actually tried to remove some.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •