Cosplay Socialists Should Run As Republicans

[Milchshake]

Well, at least they’re admitting it now. Cosplayers with podcasts and patreons have been grifting the right-wing algorithms for years. Why not just go openly as Republicans.

• Can they really get the GOP to embrace Universal coverage?
• Or does it end like all other red/brown alliance? (Night of the Long Knives)

Amber is a regular on Chapo/Red scare, when writing articles that Strasserism is a myth.

Socialists Should Be Republicans
BY
AMBER A'LEE FROST
The first generation of the GOP tried — and failed — to build a modern republic. Socialists today won’t get very far unless we finish their work.

Amid the chaos of America in 2020, a number of opportunistic political operatives have been inspired to “rebrand” in an effort to convey some sort of timely political realignment. Not so much the major players of the Democratic Party. Most of them have either remained staunchly opposed to anything from the Bernie Sanders agenda, or […]

Also why are podcaster given so much clout? Does earning tens of thousands a month on a podcast and online outrage make you Working Class?
My theory

• Hard core leftist eschewed the internet since it was the bastard child of the DoD, then became a commercialized hellhole.
• After Ron Paul retired, Anti Establishment kids noticed this void, and decided to fill it.
• Wealthy anti-establishment kids had more time to create an audience since their parents paid for rent and health insurance.
• Working class kids were too busy hustling.

[JohnBrown1917]

Do you ever get tired of just upping the bullshit you post, now even going as far as saying the Gernan left allied with the nazis at any point.

[Glorious Leader]

Ironically Jacobin has this article behind a paywall so I couldn't really read it. I imagine the title is inflammatory enough that amber is gonna be living rent free in some peoples heads for awhile. The Chapo boyz tend to have that effect.

[Ripster42]

Do you ever get tired of just upping the bullshit you post

One could ask you the same thing.

[jonnysensible]

jesus fuck these people live in your head rent free. every post from you is cosplay socialist about some extremely online people who have no tangible power. what is this thread even about

[Xeones]

I have no clue what is going on in this thread.

[Mihalik]

I have no clue what is going on in this thread.

It's just Milkshake doing the scheduled periodic attack on everything left of Ronald Reagan thing.

[JohnBrown1917]

One could ask you the same thing.

Could ask to actually get proven wrong for once, that would be fun.

[Ripster42]

Could ask to actually get proven wrong for once, that would be fun.

You accused other people of supporting rape because biden was accused by a known perjurer of assaulting her in the 90s. She never even claimed she was raped. Not just once, but literally made it your signature. You get nothing but laughed at.

[Milchshake]

You accused other people of supporting rape because biden was accused by a known perjurer of assaulting her in the 90s. She never even claimed she was raped. Not just once, but literally made it your signature. You get nothing but laughed at.

That's a part of it. They spent months claiming that; Biden was a rapist, or that his brains were leaking out of his head (operation sundown).

My theory is, they see it circle around the same 14 or so podcasters. Then bring it here to fuel their endless circle jerks.

So exposing the podcasters might help others identify their bad faith tactics. And why they're so repetitive.

[JohnBrown1917]

You accused other people of supporting rape because biden was accused by a known perjurer of assaulting her in the 90s. She never even claimed she was raped. Not just once, but literally made it your signature. You get nothing but laughed at.

Yeah, and? Laughed at because I believe victims of sexual assault? ANd she was hardly the only victim.
When you go low, you go really low.


I stand by that anybody defending Biden from his rapist actions is exactlty that, somebody who defends rapists. But thanks for bringing it up, it has been a while since it was mentioned on this forum.

- - - Updated - - -

That's a part of it. They spent months claiming that; Biden was a rapist, or that his brains were leaking out of his head (operation sundown).

My theory is, they see it circle around the same 14 or so podcasters. Then bring it here to fuel their endless circle jerks.

So exposing the podcasters might help others identify their bad faith tactics. And why they're so repetitive.

Podcasts have nothing to do with this, but good job on destroying the #metoo movement.
But that does surprise me coming from somebody who hates the working class people as much as you do.

[Krakan]

I have no clue what is going on in this thread.

I'm in the same boat... is op asking if political alliances over a singular issue break down after that issue is addressed and nearly nothing else in their political platform aligns because if so the answer is yes...yes they do break down.

[Forgettable]

Every single one of your threads:

I start reading the words you write, and I understand that they are English words, and I understand those words.
But I never have any idea what you're saying.
It's like you live in some weird sort of alternate bubble universe where words mean different things.

[Glorious Leader]

Yeah, and? Laughed at because I believe victims of sexual assault? ANd she was hardly the only victim.
When you go low, you go really low.


I stand by that anybody defending Biden from his rapist actions is exactlty that, somebody who defends rapists. But thanks for bringing it up, it has been a while since it was mentioned on this forum.

- - - Updated - - -



Podcasts have nothing to do with this, but good job on destroying the #metoo movement.
But that does surprise me coming from somebody who hates the working class people as much as you do.

#Believewoman was a thing when it was for Kavanaugh. It was exposed as being just a politicial weapon when #beievewoman didn't appy to Biden.

[Gestopft]

Every single one of your threads:

I start reading the words you write, and I understand that they are English words, and I understand those words.
But I never have any idea what you're saying.
It's like you live in some weird sort of alternate bubble universe where words mean different things.

1) OP is incredibly online
2) Most of OP's threads are some sort of smear against anyone not squarely in the establishment lane of the Democratic Party.

[Milchshake]

It dawned on me recently.
The fantasies of Fully Automated Luxury Communism are strangely similar to the incel fantasies of totally realistic Westworld-style sex robots.
Like they get that human agency is a huge barrier to their paradise, so they're hoping technology will let them bypass that.

[Ihavewaffles]

It dawned on me recently.
The fantasies of Fully Automated Luxury Communism are strangely similar to the incel fantasies of totally realistic Westworld-style sex robots.
Like they get that human agency is a huge barrier to their paradise, so they're hoping technology will let them bypass that.

I don't know what you are on, what thread is even about, but plz continue what ur doing.

This is almost SarahTrasher level of posts..

[Ivanstone]

....what?

No seriously I've read and reread this and it makes no sense at all. Mostly because it lacks examples.

I can think of three examples. Tulsi and two of MMOC's regular forum trolls. One has already made his presence known in this thread. I'm sure the other will be along soon to make posts with dramatically capitalized big words.

- - - Updated - - -

But that does surprise me coming from somebody who hates the working class people as much as you do.

And what have you done for the working class lately? You gonna blame crimes on centrist politicians instead of the right wing again?

[JohnBrown1917]

- - - Updated - - -



And what have you done for the working class lately? You gonna blame crimes on centrist politicians instead of the right wing again?

Neo-liberalism is right-wing idealogy, so I have no idea what your on about.
And I think supporting pro-working class parties does more than shitting on the poor like OP does, yes.



Kinda funny how not being a capitalist makes you a "troll" now.

[Ivanstone]

Neo-liberalism is right-wing idealogy, so I have no idea what your on about.
And I think supporting pro-working class parties does more than shitting on the poor like OP does, yes.



Kinda funny how not being a capitalist makes you a "troll" now.

I’m not a capitalist. I’m your Friendly Neighbourhood Socialist Small Business Owner.

I’m saying you’re a troll though. Loudly beating your chest about how anti-capitalist you are doesn’t make you anti-capitalist. Actually providing criticizing the real shit heads of the world might.