When Republicans are in power, anarchists are seen as leftist. When Democrats are in power, they are more aligned with the right. They're a rolling shit ball that tends to pick up loose stones from either party. Democrats in control and an anarchist demonstration is coming up? You can bet you'll see Republicans there in the ranks.
Remember during Obama's years when every Republican started cosplaying as libertarians? Yeah, it's kinda similar to that.
wot the fok, political philosophy doesnt change based on what country it is in, they might have different characteristics/needs but saying things 'anarchists are seen as leftist' is plainly wrong, they are leftist. saying things like 'anarchist are aligned with the right' is insane.
you understand basic things like an anarchist in the UK or American share the same political philosophy right?
The problem with these posts is you are describing completely different things and you dont seem to have a basic grasp of the words you are using.
You know, Genn or milschake or whatever, but has nobody told that Anarchist philosophers are from all across the world, the brits did not invent Anarchy.
You should look past American and British history for once.
- - - Updated - - -
If you have no idea what Anarchism is, dont talk about it.
It's indeed not a movement that is easy to place on the traditional left-right spectrum. They want as small a government as possible which in theory is more of a right-wing policy (in the US at least) but they are also viscerally opposed to any form of hierarchy which is more the purview of the left-wing.
Overall I'd say if they had a gun pointed at their heads and had to choose, most anarchists would veer left rather than right. But the distinction isn't very important to the ideology as a whole.
It is all that is left unsaid upon which tragedies are built -Kreia
Sorry, I feel like it's a stretch to say that anarchists pose the same kind of existential threat that white nationalism does when white nationalists are deeply entrenched in many layers of society and have carried out many large scale terrorist attacks over the years.
Let me explain American politics ascribe labels based on what sounds negative not actual ideologies, for example Obama was a socialist communist fascist president at least according to the right for 8 years. It's not really about the basics because if we were going by basics both left and right wing politics would be classified as different spectrums of conservatism.
Sounds like it's a little bit of a horseshoe effect where because of how extreme they are it looks like far left and far right all at once.
However in poking around it appears that traditionally they are considered a far left movement but not really in any sense of the term "leftist" that people use. It's too extreme an ideology to really fit in a traditional political model since all traditional political models have some form of government as the vehicle for policy.
Just for awareness some select quotes by Rochana:
I'm planning a trip to the USA around election time and I'll probably vote for Trump, just to spite the establishment Democrats... My displeasure with the Democratic Party's establishment is indeed so great that I'd not be upset if Trump won the elections again in 2020...Until then it can all burn down to the ground for all I care.
You can make a solid argument that the lack of any policy views or opinions (because, naturally, anarchists don't want a government that can implement any policy) means they don't lean either left or right. They're basically centrist, but centrist-by-absence rather than centrist-by-intent. The dial never gets shifted in either direction at all. I wouldn't say the baseline natural state of all things is far-left, and that's essentially what centrists are arguing for.