Not playing semantics. You and others continually makes claims you cannot possibly prove so you make arbitrary standards so you can claim you are right. There is no metric or data that can determine whether a player is good or bad.
Again, those are arbitrary standards and you cannot in any way say whether a player is good or not by if they completed content. Why? Because there are many players who don't do the content at all. By your logic they are automatically bad players. Not how that works. There can easily be many players who would be perfectly able to clear the hardest content, but choose not to because it doesn't interest them.I'll play along.
Lets call the upper 51% good, the lower 49% bad.
No?
Or we can call the upper 30% good, the lower 70% bad.
Ok how about the lowest keystones cleared for a server?
Or the % of players with AoTC?
No?
Hmm...how about MoP/WoD CM Modes?
No?
Mage tower?
No?
What about 16 years of playing this game, and confidently stating the average player is a mediocre player at best, and those who invest the energy into learning will become better. The latter group being a small fraction of players?
No?
There is no "massive body of evidence" because it is all based on your aribtrary standard of what good is. YOu are hthe one who wnats to feel right because you are the one pushing and aribtrary standard.Ah, you just want to feel right, despite a massive body of evidence that has been conveniently organized for you. Yes, its a body of evidence. If you're not sure how to process it to determine where you stack up, not sure what to tell you.
When one resorts to ad hominem attacks, we know we are done here.I guess the whole "Fake news" defense still works.