Page 20 of 35 FirstFirst ...
10
18
19
20
21
22
30
... LastLast
  1. #381
    Quote Originally Posted by Logwyn View Post
    Sewell has fallen on a few boards.
    Too many teams want the splashy WR instead of focusing in their line. Happens a lot and it is why many bad teams stay bad.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Logwyn View Post
    Sewell has fallen on a few boards.
    Well he didn't fall far.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Oh dammit now Joe Horn's kid will be playing for Carolina.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Well @Grube what do you think of the pick?

  2. #382
    Uhh, that isn't a QB.

    On the plus side, they screwed Jerry Jones out of Surtain.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kyanion View Post
    Well @Grube what do you think of the pick?
    If I didn't have to watch Drew Lock or Teddy Bridgewater I would like it a lot.
    Last edited by Grube; 2021-04-30 at 01:30 AM.

  3. #383
    Heard Saints wanted to trade up to get a CB, so much for that plan, both are gone.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Man QB freefall begins, Patriots might just have one fall into their lap.

    - - - Updated - - -

    There is the bizarre trading a pick to a rival in your own division trade from the Cowboys. Better yet it is the Eagles leaping over the Giants to do it.

    - - - Updated - - -

    And Eagles take a WR

  4. #384
    Giants finally trade back!

    BTW I'm fascinated that none of the other teams in this region were willing to trade back 10 picks to get the bears' next year first rounder and a fourth and a fifth.
    The desperate last chance response of a person who is losing an argument on the forums:

    Quote Originally Posted by cparle87 View Post
    You DO realize that even if every user ever on these forums agreed with you, something even you would admit is impossible, that would not be 0.0001% of the player base, right? But sure, enjoy your echo chamber if you want.

  5. #385
    Welp Fields to the Bears? RIP his career then. And they gave up a 1st next year too? Fuck that.

  6. #386
    Poor Justin Fields

  7. #387
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrod View Post
    Giants finally trade back!

    BTW I'm fascinated that none of the other teams in this region were willing to trade back 10 picks to get the bears' next year first rounder and a fourth and a fifth.
    That is quite the haul considering players the Giants prolly wanted got taken.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Grube View Post
    Poor Justin Fields
    Yeah think we may have located the potential bust. The Bears coaching staff, woof.

  8. #388
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyanion View Post
    That is quite the haul considering players the Giants prolly wanted got taken.
    Like, is Patrick Surtain really worth that much that you'd turn that trade down and pick him? It seems weird to me that it took this long.
    The desperate last chance response of a person who is losing an argument on the forums:

    Quote Originally Posted by cparle87 View Post
    You DO realize that even if every user ever on these forums agreed with you, something even you would admit is impossible, that would not be 0.0001% of the player base, right? But sure, enjoy your echo chamber if you want.

  9. #389
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrod View Post
    Like, is Patrick Surtain really worth that much that you'd turn that trade down and pick him? It seems weird to me that it took this long.
    Yeah I'd be hard pressed to say no to any trade giving me a future first like that AND a pick this year to take a defensive back. Very few players are worth trading a haul for, even less if they aren't a QB.

  10. #390
    I'm just going to assume Denver wasn't offered that same trade. Surtain is a pick for the future (Fuller, Darby and Callahan will all be ahead of him this year), so turning down another 1st for that would be questionable.

    Then again, most of Paton's moves so far have been questionable.

    ILB seems weird for the Cowboys, I thought they already had 2 really good ones.

  11. #391
    Quote Originally Posted by Grube View Post
    I'm just going to assume Denver wasn't offered that same trade. Surtain is a pick for the future (Fuller, Darby and Callahan will all be ahead of him this year), so turning down another 1st for that would be questionable.

    Then again, most of Paton's moves so far have been questionable.
    Yeah always the big mystery of what teams offer each other in trades.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Pats sit there and a QB falls to them.

  12. #392
    Cam Newton and Mac Jones is an interesting QB room. They are basically exact opposites.

  13. #393
    Moderator Northern Goblin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Cumbria, England
    Posts
    13,647
    The closer we get to 17 the more anxious I become.


    Sports and Fitness mod, Brit with weird sleeping hours.
    Has good taste in ale, bad taste in D&D choices.

  14. #394
    Quote Originally Posted by Northern Goblin View Post
    The closer we get to 17 the more anxious I become.
    Uh oh, the famous Raiders Reach?

  15. #395
    Moderator Northern Goblin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Cumbria, England
    Posts
    13,647
    I officially hate this draft.


    Sports and Fitness mod, Brit with weird sleeping hours.
    Has good taste in ale, bad taste in D&D choices.

  16. #396
    Mind if I roll need? xskarma's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Netherlands, EU
    Posts
    25,963
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyanion View Post
    Uh oh, the famous Raiders Reach?
    Ouch. That was a bit too on point.



    Mac Jones, without trading up? Fine by me. He won't be Tom Brady, but I'll settle for a more durable Jimmy Garoppolo type.

  17. #397
    Quote Originally Posted by Northern Goblin View Post
    I officially hate this draft.
    Hey when you could spend a mid-1st rounder on a player many thought was a mid round 2 player, you gotta do it?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by xskarma View Post
    Mac Jones, without trading up? Fine by me. He won't be Tom Brady, but I'll settle for a more durable Jimmy Garoppolo type.
    Yeah seems like a free shot at a QB and paying even less over 5 years than other teams will.

  18. #398
    Well, that is for sure a Gruden pick.

  19. #399
    Quote Originally Posted by Grube View Post
    Well, that is for sure a Gruden pick.
    Is it like trying to outthink the room and go after a player that early? I don't understand it. You could maybe trade that pick and just get the guy PLUS other players for nothing.

  20. #400
    The Undying Slowpoke is a Gamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    World of Wisconsin
    Posts
    35,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyanion View Post
    3 firsts for Lance, man they better be right.
    I mean they went the best QB left at 3.

    And big surprise they didn't trade up for Mac Jones after all. And Mac Jones falls past where they were all the way to.... the Patriots.

    Easiest QB fall to read ever.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Kyanion View Post
    Is it like trying to outthink the room and go after a player that early? I don't understand it. You could maybe trade that pick and just get the guy PLUS other players for nothing.
    Nah the Raiders love their "culture guys."

    Even if those culture guys are valued late 1/early 2 and taken in the early 1st.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Are we seriously still at 2 CBs total in the first round? *rubs hands* All according to keikaku.
    Fire Kotick, Fire Brack, Fire Ion.

    FFXIV - Crystal Datacenter

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •