Let's look at their HotS abilities, shall we?:
Illidan
Sweeping Strike = Fel Rush
Evasion = Blur
Metamorphosis
The Hunt = Night Fae Covenant
Immolation = Immolation Aura
Unending Hatred
Marked for Death (a Rogue/former Hunter ability)
Fiery Brand
Arthas
Death Coil
Howling Blast
Frozen Tempest = Azerite trait
Army of the Dead
Summon Sindragosa = Frostwyrm's Fury
Frost Presence
Rime
Icy Talons
Rune Tap
Icebound Fortitude
Frost Strike
Remorseless Winter
Death's Advance
Anti-Magic Shell
I don't see a reason why not to draw inspiration from HotS for the Blademaster. It, literally, expand upon the class concept.
And Demon Hunters are Night elf Warriors, according to Warcraft 3:you can just be wrong, but that is your chosing.
Blademaster are literally elite orc warriors
"These mysterious warriors ritually blind themselves so that they develop 'spectral sight' that enables them to see demons and undead with greater clarity."
"Although they are counted as some of the mightiest warriors within the Night Elves' society, the Demon Hunters are always maligned and misunderstood for making their selfless pact with darkness."
And so are Monks, for that matter:
"These affable warriors rarely seek out danger or trouble, preferring instead to spend their time concocting new and tasty beverages for any brave enough to imbibe them."
"They are peerless warriors and world class drinkers all in one!"
"A warrior Hero, the brewmasters of Pandaria have emerged from the bamboo forests of their ancestors to bring their unique fighting style (and robust ales) to the highest bidder."
Could you elaborate, please?half right half- wrong.
Would like to know who you are in favor of...
I'm not confusing anything. That is their official descritption. In-game, Beastmaster may be a ranged class. In lore, it dual-wields axes. Thrall, an Enhancement Shaman, is also considered a Warrior in lore.and we already know beastmaster is a ranger and enhancement is a shaman
you are just confusing a broad term with the real thing.
is like saying a far seer is not a shaman, but a far seer, is dumb
So, yeah, the terms are blurry and not strongly defined.
A Far Seer does not pretend to be anything else but a Shaman. It has all of its abilities in the Shaman class.
As i said, Mountain Kings, in my eyes, are Warriors. Therefore, i view its abilities as relevant to the class.except you know you are completely ignoring how they can transform themselves into avatars, scream so loud that can burst into a dragon roar and other mystical prowess
and you know what ability warriros ahve now that was also magical in nature?
I can't associate Dragon Roar to anything lore-wise, but Warriors' screams are known to be legendary (Hellscream and the Warsong Clan - "Relying on shock and awe to overwhelm their enemies, the Warsong earned their name from their fearsome battle cries and thunderous drum marches").
They possess mobility, yes. But, that doesn't make them agile and quick. That is the domain of the Rogue or the Demon Hunter. A warrior's charge is the equivalent of a Highmountain Tauren's Bull Rush. Heroic Leap is the equivalent of Muradin's Dwarf Toss ability (HotS). and as heavy-melee fighters, i don't consider them nimble and agile.they definitely are, they ahve charge, heroic leap, mobility and even get great benefit sfor getting HASTE
Well, so are Metamorphosis and Death Coil. and they have been transferred from the Warlock to the Death Knight and Demon Hunter, respectively.And that is completely retarded, cause bladestorm is a warrior ability since wc3, cause blademaster are warriors
Blademasters are fully represented? Please do tell me where in the Warrior class i can find Windwalk, Mirror Image, Image Transmission, Advancing Strikes and Illusion Master?just like blademaster are
Well, yes. If that is the description Blizzard chose to give them. For example:no
"Some blood elves become warriors (or scouts or hunters) — especially those seeking to be spell breakers, demon hunters, and rangers."
I suggested it as a separate specialization, not as a legitimacy for the Blademaster to be a class. It's not my subjective feelings. Blademasters are underrepresented in game. Other than Bladestorm, they have nothing. Saying you can wield a two handed sword would be like to say Rogues could wield Illidan Glaives, wear a Blindfold and they had the Demon Hunter's Evasion ability, therefore making them Demon Hunters.exactly, you can't make up an entire class just because they can use 2 weapons, or because you don't feel like they are already represented in the game
No, they can't. Because stealth and illusion aren't part of the Warrior fantasy.and the only thing it needs to be fully represented is mirror image and wind walk like abilities, and they can add that as talents just fine, we don't need an entire new class that will rip off the warrior class, steal and delute their fantasy.
The Blademaster will not rip off anything. Warriors will be more akin to the Mountain King and Tauren Chieftain, which have nothing in common with the Blademaster.
You argument is like those that were against the Demon Hunter: "We, already, have Warlock with Metamorphosis. Rogues can wield Illidan's Glaives. We don't need another class like them that will rip them off." But, as history would record. The Demon Hunter was added, eventually. And it made me think - if that class was added, despite all the things against it, others will too.
"Even though Grom appeared in Warcraft III as a blademaster, he was probably not one lorewise."
They needed to match him with a class. He is by no means a Blademaster. He's more of a Raider than anything else. Just like Malfurion was categorized as a Keeper of the Grove, despite not being a son of Cenarius.