IRS researchers: Top 1 percent avoids taxes on one-fifth of their income
The top 1 percent of households in terms of income fail to report an astonishing 21 percent of their income to the IRS, according to a new paper co-authored by IRS researchers and prominent academics in the National Bureau of Economic Research.
In comparison, the paper found that the bottom half of earners fail to report about 7 percent of their income.
The IRS captures data on most wage income from employers, who report the wages they pay through W-2 forms. Other income, however, earned from freelance work, collecting rent, self-employment and other avenues, must be reported directly.
Of the 21 percent of income unreported from the top tier of earners, 6 percent reportedly comes from avoidance methods that even audits would have trouble finding, such as undeclared foreign accounts and the use of pass-through businesses to hide income.
In comparison to previous estimates, the study finds that unreported income is larger by a factor of 1.1, a figure that rises to 1.3 for the top 1 percent and 1.8 for the top 0.1 percent.
Unreported income will account for some $600 billion in lost government revenues this year, and $7.5 trillion over a decade alone, according to The New York Times.
Though the new analysis focused on a few types of tax avoidance in particular, the researchers said the true figures are even higher.
"We stress that our estimates are likely to be conservative with regard to the overall amount of evasion at the top," they wrote.
Democrats look to impose capital gains tax at death
Democrats wrestle over tax hikes for infrastructure
In recent years, audit rates have declined, particularly for the rich, as IRS funding was scaled back. A Congressional Budget Office report from July found that audit rates dropped 46 percent from 2010 to 2018, and fell 61 percent for millionaires in the same time period.
The latest findings, the National Bureau of Economic Research researchers argue, show that tax evasion bolsters inequality.
One of the paper's co-authors, University of California-Berkeley economist Gabriel Zucman, has made policy waves with his research on inequality before. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) used much of his work as the basis for her wealth tax proposals.
Literally not the case.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/tax-fraud.asp
What you were supporting a couple posts up was the literal definition of tax fraud. Hooray for applauding criminal millionaires, I guess.
Cool. Stay off the roads. Don't use the courts, law enforcement or fire department for anything. If you went to public school, please remit payment for your schooling. Also, if we are invaded, please offer yourself up to the invading force, so no military resources are spent protecting you.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
And the insane thing is that the Republicans that defunded the IRS KNOW that the amount they would bring back into the treasury through thorough investigation would more than be worth the extra budget expenditure. They just insist on letting the rich get away with as much as possible.
- - - Updated - - -
Your avatar appears to have bumped its head on a rock and evolved into Moroneon.
"We must make our choice. We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."
-Louis Brandeis
That still doesn't explain how we went from a country where anyone with enough effort could make it, to a nation where the poor get poorer and the rich get richer and there's very low economic mobility. Point is, the system sucks, we need higher wages, trickle down (Raeganomics) is proven to be a scam. Unless you yourself are a millionaire already, you could be making more money if our minimum wage was higher, as it would affect wages up the entire totem pole. Instead you seem to enjoy carrying a torch for the ultra wealthy and settling for less.
And as said, nobody is blaming only the billionaires, it's the entire system that is fucked. The entire system has been designed for the last 40 years to make the rich richer and the poor poorer.
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah, try reporting your income is 80% of what it actually is. See how far you get with that.
The wealthy can get away with it because if they get caught, the fines are a simple slap on the wrist compared to what kind of money they're saving. If you get caught you'll be out on the street.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
I don't think that's their position? They're pointing out that the IRS is woefully understaffed and underfunded and is barely able to keep up with low income audits that are extremely easy to do, and can't even hope to tackle the more expansive, confusing, and costly investigations and legal cases against wealthy folks.
I mean, this is a big deal.
We don't really need a tax hike. Just enforce and/or simplify existing taxation. But people have kind of been saying this for years, at least when it comes to corporate taxes. Close the loopholes, enforce the rules.
- - - Updated - - -
It seems like a problem where the solution literally pays for itself. 20% of the top 1% income in the us is 500 billion dollars. Surely they could make ends meet? (edit: so tax on that 500bn would be idk around 200bn?)
FWIW, the IRS has said in the past they largely don't even bother auditing the wealthy's returns.
https://www.propublica.org/article/i...audit-the-poor
The wealthy have A> longer returns with more to pore through, and B> more access to loopholes and lawful tax avoidance, and C> teams of lawyers and accountants to make it a nightmare to go after them. So the IRS just . . . doesn't. It costs too much compared to how much they can claw back in return.
Which, for the record, is the wrong fucking approach. It would be like if police departments just didn't investigate gang members because "hey, those guys might shoot back."
Also, finding folks with the experience and knowledge to pursue those more complex audits/investigations/cases is extremely difficult for the IRS between the hugely negative public image and comparative poverty-pay compared to what they can make working for the people the IRS would want them to audit.