Basically what you're describing is this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7e5eYw-QEPI
I'm not re-reading Proust to humor you. And, honestly, the Warcraft lore used to be solid A/B tier high fantasy writing, but it's slid way the hell down in good part because they took complicated and ambiguous characters and decided "y'know, we don't have enough one-dimensional heel characters running around". It's like having early-book ASOIAF characters and saying "what we really need is for you to be Skeletor"
Calling Warcraft's narrative "solid A/B-tier high fantasy writing" is probably gilding the lily a bit much, to be honest. The A and B tiers would be occupied by lofty franchises like the LotR sagas, Rothfuss' The Name of the Wind, Jordan's The Wheel of Time, Sanderson's Mistborn trilogy, and other such works. Even back at its narrative height Warcraft would be on the lower end of C-tier - mostly sketched and without much in the way of world-building, relying more on age and audience recognition than a cohesive narrative. I'm not really on the same "Danuser is the devil" bandwagon that most people on this forum seem to occupy, as I see WoW's current story woes more as a symptom of an ongoing issue than a totemic issue with a single writer. WoW has never paid much heed to its own internal cohesion or continuity, and the damage to said continuity tends to be cumulative as opposed to singular.
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
"We're more of the love, blood, and rhetoric school. Well, we can do you blood and love without the rhetoric, and we can do you blood and rhetoric without the love, and we can do you all three concurrent or consecutive. But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory. They're all blood, you see." ― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Bolvar: The Jailer is no more, he who sought to undo death has fallen victim to it.
Arbiter: The position cannot remain vacant, another must take his place.
The Speaker: To maintain the balance of the Shadowlands, a Jailer must exist... but who?
Bolvar: I know one we can use, but will she suffice?
Voljin: The spirits granted me clarity, and now more than ever, i know her true purpose!
Arbiter: I have judged her soul, she will fit the bill, by being the Jailer, she will pay for her crimes...there must always be...a Jailer.
Yea i see this happening...
The First Ones could just be the guys that made everything, such as the cities, the forces, etc.
- - - Updated - - -
That MAY or may not happen. Idc if it does (Fuck Sylvanas, let her be the Death queen of hell or some edgy 17 year old highschool girl fantasy shit, idfc), but if it's used in that dialogue...
I'll actually quit the game. Honestly.
- - - Updated - - -
The OG Dragon Ball Manga.