No i don't.
- - - Updated - - -
Got to agree, it's highly unlikely.
That particular flight didn't flew because they failed to approve non-Belorussian route in time given rapid pace of events, not because Russia is covering for Belarus in any way.
- - - Updated - - -
You insisting on including fighter jet in an equation is really strange.
Quote them. Should be easy enough.As previously stated a fighter jet is by its very definition a threat; and therefore the rest of Europe and the US includes this when they accuse Belarus of forcing the plane to the ground using a military aircraft.
Again you're pushing disinfo. No, it was just false bomb threat. There was no point at which military aircraft had any hand in "forcing" the plane to land.This is what we know:
The terrorist state of Belarus used a knowingly false bomb threat and a military aircraft to force the plane travelling between two EU countries to the ground in Minsk.
*you absolutely can imagine argument here*The terrorist state Belarus hijacked a plane and risked the lives of more than a hundred passengers just to kidnap two dissidents.
It's interesting with how EU overreacts to such things when they are on a receiving end.Many countries no longer fly over Belarus and Belarussian aircrafts are denied access to most of the rest of Europe.
Though do they have any other option? I guess against anyone defended by Russia they don't.