The problem with alliance bias.

[Feanoro]

Horde out here playing with peepeepoopoo and sticks, while Alliance out here with mechs, airships, trams, navy fleets, space ships, guns, helicopters, god powers, etc

And not a damn bit of those advantages are EVER allowed to be used.

The story has yet to proceed with the logical consequences of events like Teldrassil. Alliance bias, my ass.

- - - Updated - - -

Anyone who says there aint no alliance bias is clearly delusional

Horde might have an edge when it comes to gameplay but story wise alliance is leading lots

We couldn't even kill mekkatorque arguable the most worthless racial leader, no he returned as a gnomish iron man

Horde is the story, Alliance is a plot device for them. Alliance leaders surviving is one of the bones thrown to Alliance players in hopes they'll keep paying their subscriptions.

[Maljinwo]

*Elf. He is super 100% belf fan, you may know him as Erevien and he usually hates on orcs on both Discord and forums.

Luckily I don't know him.

[Stardrift]

And not a damn bit of those advantages are EVER allowed to be used.

The story has yet to proceed with the logical consequences of events like Teldrassil. Alliance bias, my ass.

- - - Updated - - -

Horde is the story, Alliance is a plot device for them. Alliance leaders surviving is one of the bones thrown to Alliance players in hopes they'll keep paying their subscriptions.

Agreed. I don't think there's any sort of bias going on. It's just dANUSer writing himself into a hole every time he writes.

But who can blame him? Most of his lore is made up on the spot in interviews when he's asked questions he clearly wasn't prepared to answer. WoW's story is fucking improvised through and through, I swear.

Nothing since Legion has been canon though at least. Everything has gone from point A to point B then directly back to point A again, so it's almost as if everything in-between never happened at all.

[geco]

Nothing since Legion has been canon though at least. Everything has gone from point A to point B then directly back to point A again, so it's almost as if everything in-between never happened at all.

Or jump from point A to point B. Without any plot in between.

[Tanaria]

Why not play purple elves in the alliance? Silvermoon just need to be razed and elves banned from the game

Or your favorite race/s need to be banned from the game and your city/s need to be razed. I mean, who needs you in the game? Blood Elves are the reason the Horde is played.

I'm all for that.

[Calfredd]

*Elf. He is super 100% belf fan, you may know him as Erevien and he usually hates on orcs on both Discord and forums.

Really? With the way he was acting in his Forsaken thread, I'd have thought he was Undead or something.

[VladlTutushkin]

Really? With the way he was acting in his Forsaken thread, I'd have thought he was Undead or something.

He generally pretends to be some "horde defender" but comes out as unstable shizo who just likes anything edgy, no matter how retarded or bad it was.

[Myradin]

jeez, thank god aliance didnt attack single horde city in the meantime... its not like two (technicaly 3 if we count nighthold which is in nightborne capital) capital cities were raids...

And the horde got to keep all of them.

A horde 'loss' is them saying sorry and keeping their stuff.

An alliance loss is a burning ruin, a plaguepit, or a crator where people's souls were destroyed.

[dfsdfvh]

Yet according to blizzard devs, Alliance wins every conflicts since then. Guess they just don't care about the Alliance at all and only throw us some bones to justify their action.

[geco]

Yet according to blizzard devs, Alliance wins every conflicts since then. Guess they just don't care about the Alliance at all and only throw us some bones to justify their action.

The Victory at BFA.
The Night War.
Valeria and Turalyon.
Have more NPCs alive.

They are all things that are not really worth anything. Why they are not shown in the game. Or they show them to you as "useless" things.

PS: Like many things that the Horde has as good the whole plot of BFA. They are also things that are worth nothing.

[Lolites]

And the horde got to keep all of them.

A horde 'loss' is them saying sorry and keeping their stuff.

An alliance loss is a burning ruin, a plaguepit, or a crator where people's souls were destroyed.

and when horde does something they lost leader or other lore important character
when alliance commits ethnic purge or attacks during armistice or other war crimes they dont even get scolded, when they murder droves of civilians its always "justified" or retconed... horde using blight is sooo horrible, yet alliance using fire to do literaly the same are soo righteous...

[cparle87]

And you would be incredibly dishonest if you did count Nighthold since the nightborne were not part of the Horde at the time.

So we also can't count the Horde attacking and occupying Gilneas since they weren't Alliance at the time.

[Feanoro]

So we also can't count the Horde attacking and occupying Gilneas since they weren't Alliance at the time.

Yeah, we just count that as the Horde's typical KILL EVERYTHING DAT NOT US modus operandi.

[qwerty123456]

Anyone who says there aint no alliance bias is clearly delusional

Horde might have an edge when it comes to gameplay but story wise alliance is leading lots

We couldn't even kill mekkatorque arguable the most worthless racial leader, no he returned as a gnomish iron man

Horde took out several cities in Teldrassil as well as like half a dozen or more throughout the rest of Kalimdor nearly wiping out an entire species. While the Horde loses a faction leader every now and then. Every victory the Alliance gets is only after a defeat from the Horde and then the Horde doesn't even get punished for what they do. I think one side clearly wins more storywise.

Oh yeah and Blizzard just shit out a bunch of horses for Alliance while actually creating mounts for the Horde.

[mysticx]

Yet according to blizzard devs, Alliance wins every conflicts since then. Guess they just don't care about the Alliance at all and only throw us some bones to justify their action.

That's because if the Horde wins, the Alliance is destroyed, when the Alliance wins, they go "Well, don't do it again, ok?" and let the Horde keep everything they conquered, now which of these two is better for keeping the storyline going?

[Raven]

Just have to check on raiding to see who Blizzard has biased, its gone to the level of only way to fix it, is to make Alliance so Op that you have to play as Alliance if you want any chance on world first.

[KOUNTERPARTS]

OP do you just come back from repeated bans to only post pro-Horde obsession threads and sperg out on everybody who posts in the thread?


Just why

[Ielenia]

So we also can't count the Horde attacking and occupying Gilneas since they weren't Alliance at the time.

I don't recall ever saying otherwise, here in this thread?

[Aurondarklord]

Imagine thinking that Blizzard's bias is in favor of the ALLIANCE. You start wars with us like every three expansions, destroy our cities, we're NEVER allowed to inflict real consequences for that, you just overthrow your own leader, not for us, but for dicking with YOUR people, and call it good enough. And Sylvanas will probably get away with it all anyway, get a redemption arc, and we'll have to swallow being told what a great person this genocidal maniac death Nazi is.

[Soon-TM]

Naah Horde need to go back to the old days, when they where the "evil" choice and that was accepted and even a big part of why some people picked them.

It's been quite some time since WC2. I'd wager that most Horde players weren't enticed by a bunch of demonic addled murderhobos, but rather by (early) Thrall's Horde, which just sought a place in this world while fighting the ghosts of the past.