Yet there all holy warrior's no matter where there power comes from or how far removed from the actual holy light they are just like the TH members.
Prove it. show me the meaning of those words and how my Interpretation doesn't fit Like I did with holy.That is pure projection, because your "interpretation" of the dark ranger's description is one that simply does not fit the actual meaning of the words used in the description.
Again no where have I equated ranger and dark ranger I just asked a yes no question on what he's been called YOU are the only one who has equated the two.And I will say this one last time: you're equating "ranger" with "dark ranger" here. Being called a "ranger" is not the same thing as being called a "dark ranger". Make the distinction between the two first, then we can talk.
I haven't done either. all I've done is lay out that all of your statements and ask for Simple yes/no Answer for you to clarify if you think there right or wrong Which you refused to do, here Ill quote all of them for you to show case your pathetic squirming around Nathanos and the dark rangers You refuse to admit to.Says the poster who is cherry-picking what is canon and what isn't, and asking loaded question.
You say dark rangers don't use pets other then Nathanos, this is wrong.
you say he didn't have pets until he was a raid boss, this is wrong
You imply he only became a dark ranger after dark mirror even quoting the passage on dark mirror and bolding parts, Note the word Imply I'm not putting any words into your wormy mouth.and to quote my self about your spineless Squirming because you can't admit to being wrong.
All of the facts are on my side while you try and squirm around the truth so you don't have to admit to being wrong on every thing.he's been a dark ranger since he was raised,he has always had pets, Dark rangers do in fact have pets, and all of your previous statements about him were a frivolous waste of every one's time based off of nothing