machismo refusing to learn what a wealth tax is for 30 pages, you love to see it
Because it's objectively not important.
Claiming that they have reduced ability to invest is pointless when they a) aren't using that ability and b) the evasion of using that ability represents a social blight.
Whereas I can guarantee you the recipients of the aid those tax dollars pay for will be reinvesting it almost immediately.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Companies sell stocks to liquidate assets, and buy them back all the time. So do investors. This just puts an increased burden on them, and there's no reinvestment. They no longer have the money.
This slows the economy.
- - - Updated - - -
Its not my position, take it up with the other guy.
- - - Updated - - -
Oh, I simply oppose it.
- - - Updated - - -
Yep,you dodged.
"stop trying to get me to hold one argument for longer than one post!"Its not my position, take it up with the other guy.
I'm just agreeing with you when you said that objectivity was my claim, not yours. You didn't have to admit your arguments were based entirely on opinion.
- - - Updated - - -
Go figure that libertarians believe money just disappears when it gets taxed by the government.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi