Report: Tax Returns of the Top 25 Wealthiest in America

[Machismo]

As opposed to cheering forced capitalism?

Didn't see an answer there so I'll assume your claim of "destroying" the company was, as you call everyone else's claims a "lie".

You want to force people to sell their own companies, because they're successful.

That's fucking evil.

- - - Updated - - -

That's not what I said. The evidence is there. You are against freedom. Enjoy!

Show me your math.

[beanman12345]

As opposed to cheering forced capitalism?

Didn't see an answer there so I'll assume your claim of "destroying" the company was, as you call everyone else's claims a "lie".

It's is full on anti-freedom authoritarianism on full display.

[Elegiac]

Nope, you want to tax people out of their own property.

So yeah, you're admitting your issue is really just a childishly simplistic opposition to the taking of stuff from people rather than any substantive argument about it resulting in "the breaking up companies" or destroying the economy or flatlining people's 401ks or any of that fearmongering nonsense you've been parroting from Mark Cuban for 600 posts.

Lol.

[Machismo]

So yeah, you're admitting your issue is really just an opposition to the taking of stuff from people rather than any substantive argument about it breaking up companies or destroying the economy or flatlining people's 401ks or any of that fearmongering nonsense you've been parroting from Mark Cuban for 600 posts.

Lol.

yes, my is with you trying to seize the wealth of people you hate.

We saw others do that shit, even fought a war over it.


I have provided dozens of sources, you don't even know what capital gains are.

[Elegiac]

yes, my is with you trying to seize the wealth of people you hate.

No. I'm trying to give the people who had a hand in building that wealth the portion to which they are entitled.

[Machismo]

No. I'm trying to give the people who had a hand in building their wealth the portion of wealth to which they are entitled.

So, forced socialism... Man, he would be proud.

[Elegiac]

So, forced socialism... Man, he would be proud.

Is this the part where you bring up Stalin or Mao as if pointing to systems in which there was a complete lack of democratic input into how the economy or society was run as a counter-example to people calling for increased democratization of the economy?

Lol. Why do you hate freedom so much, man.

[Machismo]

Is this the part where you bring up Stalin or Mao as if pointing to systems in which there was a complete lack of democratic input into how the economy or society was run as a counter-example to people calling for increased democratization of the economy?

Lol. Why do you hate freedom so much, man.

Well, the Leninists did love their democracy. You should just start murdering the rich, already.

No time like the present.

[Elegiac]

Well, the Leninists did love their democracy. You should just start murdering the rich, already.

You do realise the only reason people started murdering the rich was because wealth inequality was allowed to get to such a grotesque point that most people were suffering in practice, right?

[Machismo]

You do realise the only reason people started murdering the rich was because wealth inequality was allowed to get to such a grotesque point that most people were suffering in practice, right?

Just because the GOP bans abortion, doesn't mean young mothers-to-be can't bootstrap that shit, and figure something else out.

Good luck with your Kristallnacht, or do you have a new name?

[Elegiac]

Just because the GOP bans abortion, doesn't mean young mothers-to-be can't bootstrap that shit, and figure something else out.

Good luck with your Kristallnacht, or do you have a new name?

Good to know bringing up a basic historical fact is enough to cause you to devolve into full on Trumpian nonsense.

We've got an abortion non sequitur, Godwinning, and a claim that taxing the rich is on par with ethnic cleansing all in one post.

[Machismo]

Good to know bringing up a basic historical fact is enough to cause you to devolve into full on Trumpian nonsense.

Trump is the fascist authoritarian... so that would be you.

He's a national socialist, you two should hang out.

[beanman12345]

Trump is the fascist authoritarian... so that would be you.

Nope, we established that the trump fascist authoritarian is you. The evidence has been provided.

Enjoy!

[Machismo]

Nope, we established that the trump fascist authoritarian is you. The evidence has been provided.

Enjoy!

Could you provide it again, I must have missed it.

[Elegiac]

He's a national socialist, you two should hang out.

You...do realise that fascism is an explicitly elitist ideology and thus completely contradictory to calls for more egalitarian ownership of the economy, yes? That the national socialists were too busy hanging out with CEOs? Lol.

[beanman12345]

Could you provide it again, I must have missed it.

She has the choice not to be taxed out of her company by adapting. she has the personal freedom to sink or swim. Why are you so against people's freedom?

Enjoy the evidence fascist authoritarian.

[Machismo]

You...do realise that fascism is an explicitly elitist ideology and thus completely contradictory to calls for more egalitarian ownership of the economy, yes?

Nah, you're sharpening your knives right now.

- - - Updated - - -

So, we have covered that almost everyone in this thread accepts that plans like these will cause people to sell their own companies.

We've established this with evidence and statistics.

We've established that they know these are the results, and still support it.

That means we know that this is their goal.

[Shadowferal]

We are whatever you decide to paint is so your empty arguments have merit. They don’t. Just empty words for an empty suit.

*shrugs*
He always paints people with extremes. Taking a moderate position such as progressive taxation (as it once was...but that's a history lesson he never wants anyone to know about) means compromise. And that means he couldn't afford a third house.

Has he cried that he's the only person arguing for freedom...liberty or some other shit yet?

[Elegiac]

*shrugs*
He always paints people with extremes. Taking a moderate position such as progressive taxation (as it once was...but that's a history lesson he never wants anyone to know about) means compromise. And that means he couldn't afford a third house.

Has he cried that he's the only person arguing for freedom...liberty or some other shit yet?

Nah, he's gone full Machismo Taylor Greene and is now trying to equate taxing the rich with episodes of the Holocaust.

[Machismo]

*shrugs*
He always paints people with extremes. Taking a moderate position such as progressive taxation (as it once was...but that's a history lesson he never wants anyone to know about) means compromise. And that means he couldn't afford a third house.

Has he cried that he's the only person arguing for freedom...liberty or some other shit yet?

I literally proved that it would force them to sell their own companies, and you agreed.

Why do you want to force people to sell their own companies?