Page 11 of 20 FirstFirst ...
9
10
11
12
13
... LastLast
  1. #201
    Quote Originally Posted by willtron View Post
    And that's a problem. Why build Portal or Hazard Zone if they won't support and develop it. Same thing happened with Firestorm - apparently that counted as 10 maps, funny thing was, Firestorm was 9/10s there, it just needed a bit of polish and F2P as a feeder to BFV and it would've been perfect, they should've done the same with Hazard Zone. AAA means nothing these days, it's not a stamp of quality or assurance. Just money behind the publisher.

    That's great you enjoy it, I'm genuienly happy for you. Unfortunatly for me, it's a mediocre game and a shit battlefield game. It just feels like it was made to sell, not to play - on top of the fact is was clearly supposed to be a BR game they changed very late into development.
    Won't support? The game just launched. Portal is fun from what I've played, nice change of pace, and Hazard Zone holds no interest for me. They're experimenting with new modes, I don't see any issue.

    And I don't think it was ever "clearly" supposed to be a BR game like...ever? They tried that with BF1 and it didn't go well, and they have their own BR game in Apex Legends, so what's the point of mashing that mode into BF2042, when they know players aren't super interested, and it would just compete with their more heavily monetized BR game?

    Hazard Zone seems more like a "spin" on BR with a very different take on it but I haven't looked too closely since I'm really only interested in playing conquest/breakthrough.

    - - - Updated - - -

    https://twitter.com/BattlefieldComm/...12900255911940

    Updates coming -

    Fixing revives (when you couldn't revive someone randomly, or when you were stuck and unable to respawn)
    UAV getting added back into the game
    Fixing missing/deleted loadouts
    Nerfs to hovercraft and Nightbird (armor/health/weapons)

    Revive fix is gonna be good, it's really annoying when you randomly can't revive someone because like, their head is clipping into a rock or a wall. And more easily killed/less deadly hovercrafts will be solid. Still plenty of fun and power zooming around and running over people and causing chaos, but I guess they'll be less of a "tank" now, as they should be.

  2. #202
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    ...and? Most of EA's AAA releases have primary and support studios working on them, that doesn't mean the support studios are working on them full time the entire cycle though.

    It's fine for me. I'm enjoying it plenty. I get plenty of the criticisms and I'm not trying to dismiss them, but for me, I'm happy enough with it.
    I understand why you find some enjoyment from it, I do too. Otherwise I wouldnt keep trying to go back. It just feels very hollow for me. I get the urge to play Battlefield, I enjoy that IP. This just feels lacking in so many ways. I agree with willtron and a lot of vocal people echoing the thought of, so many studios were pulled from other projects to work on Battlefield 2042, for three...years. This is what they came up with. None of what makes Battlefield, Battlefield feels like it's in this game to me. Especially when they keep cutting back on vehicles for balance. I almost feel like Warzone coulda better job of Battlefield than 2042 does if they just made it two sides.

  3. #203
    So only having the base version i played it for the first time today, the thing that stood out to me most is hit detection is pretty broken, I tested a few games solo with bots and frequently had my snipe shots just go straight through them so it's not just 'lag'.

  4. #204
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Won't support? The game just launched. Portal is fun from what I've played, nice change of pace, and Hazard Zone holds no interest for me. They're experimenting with new modes, I don't see any issue.
    They aren't going to have 3 support studios support the game indefinitently, it doesn't make sense economically, especially when NFS was put on hold. Dice sweden can't do it themselves, they've proven that and been shit for a long time. It took Dice LA to fix BF4.

    And I don't think it was ever "clearly" supposed to be a BR game like...ever?
    Yes it was a BR initially;

    - Specialists + removal of classes
    - Gadgets for all
    - Open maps with no flow
    - Armour
    - Cheesy end of round voice lines
    - 128 players (Patrick Soderlund on record as saying 128 players isn't fun, they've tested it in other games)

    They tried that with BF1 and it didn't go well
    They didn't try it with BF1, BF1 had Incursions which was a failed 5v5 competitive independent game.

    they have their own BR game in Apex Legends, so what's the point of mashing that mode into BF2042, when they know players aren't super interested, and it would just compete with their more heavily monetized BR game?
    What's the point? Money. EA don't give a shit if you like the game or not, they care what gives them the greatest return and engagement. You seem to be under the impression most people are going to think "I spent £5 in Apex, I won't spend that in BF", the reality is, that will happen and EA can double dip for essentially the same crap. They don't care where the money comes from, as long as it comes in and they can show investors. That's it. The Fifa MTX dude didn't move to DICE for his health.

    Hazard Zone seems more like a "spin" on BR with a very different take on it but I haven't looked too closely since I'm really only interested in playing conquest/breakthrough.
    It's not BR, it's an extraction game mode, something Tarkov-esque. They're trying to get ahead of the next gaming fad - Firestorm was behind the curve.

    My EA trial is up, £3.99 well spent - I'l lwait 6 months and for a sale. Until then, I'll stick to BFV, Insurgency and Arma.
    1) Load the amount of weight I would deadlift onto the bench
    2) Unrack
    3) Crank out 15 reps
    4) Be ashamed of constantly skipping leg day

  5. #205
    The real counter to vehicles seems to be locked behind level 60 and some amount of mastery with the 'one shot sniper' to get the anti tank rounds. I have a feeling vehicles are going to be much much less effective with a few of those on a team, a coordinated 4man squad could instantly take out hovercraft for example.

  6. #206
    Is there seriously no server browser for 2042 Conquest game on the PC.

    Bought it Friday for my son and I, we both play on our Gaming rigs but for the life of me can't figure out or where to find the actual server browser to look up which server is playing specific maps or player amounts, ping, etc...

    Only way to play Conquest, is by auto joining, the game, but it doesn't give any options on which map t play or anything.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Battlefield is a PC game, meant to be huge outdoor maps with tons of vehicles and two different armies, each team working together in squads to capture bases across the map.

    Lots of tanks and helicopters and troops going across big outdoor maps to meet up against the enemy with their tanks and choppers, in one huge ongoing battle.

    Battlefield is never meant to be Counter Strike or the kiddy action arcade console game CoD, and God forbid never Fortnite.

    - - - Updated - - -

    How come when I'm a gunner in a Tank or vehicle, and have what a 50 mm chain gun I'm shooting players, and it takes a bunch of shots to kill them. I shoot them, and see the hit box informing me I am indeed shooting them, but they keep running, and I have to spray them pretty god before it kills them. WTF? They should die pretty much immediate on contact of my first 1 or 2 seconds of being hit, or the game should at least slow them down to a crouching crawl.

  7. #207
    It finally made it to the bottom-ten on steam

    https://steam250.com/bottom100

  8. #208
    The Unstoppable Force PACOX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    ██████
    Posts
    23,914
    Worst game ever?

    Steam reviewers are killing their credibility.

    Resident Cosplay Progressive

  9. #209
    Quote Originally Posted by PACOX View Post
    Worst game ever?

    Steam reviewers are killing their credibility.
    Is it the best game ever? No, I would rate it currently at an 8.

    At this point, it's just review bombing.
    Just don't reply to me. Please. If you can help it.

  10. #210
    Quote Originally Posted by Ausr View Post
    Is it the best game ever? No, I would rate it currently at an 8.

    At this point, it's just review bombing.
    People usually review bomb over some stupid agenda, there is none of that here this game is just a hollow mess of problems.
    It is nowhere near an 8. Nowhere near a fucking 8, get real.

  11. #211
    Quote Originally Posted by EyelessCrow View Post
    People usually review bomb over some stupid agenda, there is none of that here this game is just a hollow mess of problems.
    It is nowhere near an 8. Nowhere near a fucking 8, get real.
    Thinking people don't review bomb just to pile on is straight up ignorance and stupidity.

    See, that's the beauty about opinions. I have it up to an 7-8 because I'm getting what I want out of it.
    Just don't reply to me. Please. If you can help it.

  12. #212
    Quote Originally Posted by Ausr View Post
    Thinking people don't review bomb just to pile on is straight up ignorance and stupidity.

    See, that's the beauty about opinions. I have it up to an 7-8 because I'm getting what I want out of it.
    And what would that be, exactly?

    That you don't have scoreboards and KD stats?
    That you cannot switch teams?
    That you can only auto-join conquest?
    That even the rig in my signature can't hit 120 fps on 1440p?
    That a hovercraft made of rubber can outlive a barrage of rockets?
    That yet another AAA game releases a bug infested MVP status game as a finished product?
    Or is it maybe the more subtle awful dogshit rubber banding, bullet collision detection, dysfunctional shields and shot-locking upon spawn?

    And don't get me started on the classes/specs and loadout choices. Everyone can equip RPG types? Wow, I'm sure flying must be super fun.



    Tell me exactly what makes this game 8/10 for you for gods sake. Or was the satirical amusement what you were gunning for?
    Corsair 4000X RGB || AMD Ryzen 9 5900X || ASUS ROG Strix X570-F || AMD Radeon RX 6800XT Sapphire Pulse
    64GB G.Skill RipJaws V DDR4-3600 || NZXT Kraken X63

  13. #213
    Quote Originally Posted by Ausr View Post
    Thinking people don't review bomb just to pile on is straight up ignorance and stupidity.

    See, that's the beauty about opinions. I have it up to an 7-8 because I'm getting what I want out of it.
    No you're letting your bad tastes in content and poor consumer habits cloud your judgement. Name one game that was review bombed "just because people wanted to" and didn't either have some kind of left or right agenda behind it, or was a game that the majority hated because of major technical/gameplay issues. You seem like a contrarian to be quite honest. Whatever the majority is pissed off at, you think is GOTY content.

    Also I love that you call me ignorant and stupid, and how in your opinion it's an 8...then you change it to a 7-8. You can't even stick to your conviction.

  14. #214
    https://www.reddit.com/r/battlefield..._m5_recoilless

    Kek, level 60 sniper rifle with anti-armor rounds shits all over the actual anti-tank rocket launcher.

    I haven't messed around with the anti-tank ammo on some of the other weapons, but curious if they've got remotely similar performance. Rockets are nice and all, but man do they often feel kinda useless unless you've got a few folks pelting a target with one. Also will make actually hitting hovercraft a lot easier with this rifle.

    I'm only level 25 though, so got a ways to go before unlocking that. Haven't even messed around with the new soldier lady I unlocked, still just sticking with the medic lady and her healy gun. I like the healy gun.

  15. #215
    They did not playtest much but why do it when people pay 100+$ or € to do it for you ?

    The core of the game is cool but, boy, they do need a lot of polish. Still enjoying the game though.

    Ah yes, almost forgot, pp-29 users have no soul.

  16. #216
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    https://www.reddit.com/r/battlefield..._m5_recoilless

    Kek, level 60 sniper rifle with anti-armor rounds shits all over the actual anti-tank rocket launcher.

    I haven't messed around with the anti-tank ammo on some of the other weapons, but curious if they've got remotely similar performance. Rockets are nice and all, but man do they often feel kinda useless unless you've got a few folks pelting a target with one. Also will make actually hitting hovercraft a lot easier with this rifle.

    I'm only level 25 though, so got a ways to go before unlocking that. Haven't even messed around with the new soldier lady I unlocked, still just sticking with the medic lady and her healy gun. I like the healy gun.
    It is objectively better then the rocket launcher, but.. I don't think people are highlighting the fact that one is a main gun and the other is a gadget enough. You can use a pp29 and be a god vs infantry at most but the longest ranges while still be able to hurt vehicles with a rocket launcher gadget. Meanwhile using the sniper all your good for is anti vehicle but you excel at it better then anyone else, which seems pretty fair.

  17. #217
    Quote Originally Posted by Tsarez View Post
    And what would that be, exactly?

    That you don't have scoreboards and KD stats?
    That you cannot switch teams?
    That you can only auto-join conquest?
    That even the rig in my signature can't hit 120 fps on 1440p?
    That a hovercraft made of rubber can outlive a barrage of rockets?
    That yet another AAA game releases a bug infested MVP status game as a finished product?
    Or is it maybe the more subtle awful dogshit rubber banding, bullet collision detection, dysfunctional shields and shot-locking upon spawn?

    And don't get me started on the classes/specs and loadout choices. Everyone can equip RPG types? Wow, I'm sure flying must be super fun.



    Tell me exactly what makes this game 8/10 for you for gods sake. Or was the satirical amusement what you were gunning for?
    You do. Literally at the end of the match.
    Why would you switch teams?
    You know they do actually have browser games.
    Then your rig sucks.
    They're literally fixing that. Or get better and use C5, kill the pilot, use vehicles.
    Bugs happen.

    You KNEW about the Operator change. It's like reading a sign for a store that says "When you buy something, you get kicked in the nuts." and you stupidly do that. Get gud with flying then.


    No you're letting your bad tastes in content and poor consumer habits cloud your judgement. Name one game that was review bombed "just because people wanted to" and didn't either have some kind of left or right agenda behind it, or was a game that the majority hated because of major technical/gameplay issues. You seem like a contrarian to be quite honest. Whatever the majority is pissed off at, you think is GOTY content.

    Also I love that you call me ignorant and stupid, and how in your opinion it's an 8...then you change it to a 7-8. You can't even stick to your conviction.
    https://www.cbr.com/games-review-bombed-before-release/ A 5 second google search and it was one of the top articles.

    You are stupid and ignorant. Just stay mad on the internet, read my sig, and realize you can't even do that because "I'm mad other people like the game. Womp womp."

    Ah yes, my previous BF posts about how things need to change and replying to some idiot on the internet makes me a contrarian. You got me. I'm a rebel.
    Just don't reply to me. Please. If you can help it.

  18. #218
    Im just little worried about coz DICE dont even say nothing dont even bother to say hey we know we f up we work on this and this we know optimization is bad we work on this etc

    Its a little confused mby ea snap their necks ? and have right now hard time ?

    They must know it its gonna be garbage

  19. #219
    So all 3 major shooters have flopped so far this year


    Are gamers finally developing taste?

  20. #220
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    https://www.reddit.com/r/battlefield..._m5_recoilless

    Kek, level 60 sniper rifle with anti-armor rounds shits all over the actual anti-tank rocket launcher.

    I haven't messed around with the anti-tank ammo on some of the other weapons, but curious if they've got remotely similar performance. Rockets are nice and all, but man do they often feel kinda useless unless you've got a few folks pelting a target with one. Also will make actually hitting hovercraft a lot easier with this rifle.

    I'm only level 25 though, so got a ways to go before unlocking that. Haven't even messed around with the new soldier lady I unlocked, still just sticking with the medic lady and her healy gun. I like the healy gun.
    Yeah, one more reason this game is not for me. I cannot get over the stupidity of shooting a tank with a rifle and blowing it up, with or without weapon balance. It's like the level of 90ies FPS games.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadoowpunk View Post
    Take that haters.
    IF IM STUPID, so is Donald Trump.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •