Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ...
6
7
8
  1. #141
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Russia is still world #2 military though, and that isn't going to change anytime soon.

    Certainly well above UK level.

    Area around Crimea is blocked exactly because of NATO exercises and to reduce potential for provocative maneuvers like this one.
    Useless comparison as Russia would never fight only the UK but EU or NATO as a whole.

  2. #142
    Quote Originally Posted by Specialka View Post
    Useless comparison as Russia would never fight only the UK but EU or NATO as a whole.
    Useless train of thought because there will never be an armed conflict between Russia and NATO. Ever. There's way to much money to be made for everyone. All we get is the occasional shake-up to convince us that the other side is still bad while we build 3 pipelines to import russian gas to Europe. Russia has nothing to gain from attacking NATO, nor the other way around, and NATO doesn't care enough about the small countries around Russia to do anything if they get annexed. Europe doesn't give a shit about Ukraine, the US doesn't give a shit about Ukraine, so nothing will ever come from this, Propaganda on both sides aside.

  3. #143
    Quote Originally Posted by Specialka View Post
    Useless comparison as Russia would never fight only the UK but EU or NATO as a whole.
    In case of UK provocation it is entirely possible for Russia to fight UK alone.

    But most provocations will be answered in different dimensions.

    Just like Turkish provocation with downing Russian bomber didn't create war between Russia and NATO, neither will destruction of any UK ship.
    Last edited by Shalcker; 2021-07-09 at 11:36 AM.

  4. #144
    Banned Ihavewaffles's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    The spice must flow!
    Posts
    6,149
    Nato article 5 is defense of nato territory, not backing a nato country going outside in other lands. Like nato didn't have to invade iraq.

  5. #145
    Banned Kellhound's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Bank of the Columbia
    Posts
    20,935
    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    Russia is still world #2 military though, and that isn't going to change anytime soon.

    Certainly well above UK level.

    Area around Crimea is blocked exactly because of NATO exercises and to reduce potential for provocative maneuvers like this one.
    China is superior to Russia in most respects now. Nukes being a major point.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Skulltaker View Post
    Useless train of thought because there will never be an armed conflict between Russia and NATO. Ever. There's way to much money to be made for everyone. All we get is the occasional shake-up to convince us that the other side is still bad while we build 3 pipelines to import russian gas to Europe. Russia has nothing to gain from attacking NATO, nor the other way around, and NATO doesn't care enough about the small countries around Russia to do anything if they get annexed. Europe doesn't give a shit about Ukraine, the US doesn't give a shit about Ukraine, so nothing will ever come from this, Propaganda on both sides aside.
    There will not be because Russia know it will not be able to win a war of aggression against NATO and NATO has no desire to start aggression against Russia. Europe will eventually wean itself of Russian gas, and Russia will be of even less concern.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Shalcker View Post
    In case of UK provocation it is entirely possible for Russia to fight UK alone.

    But most provocations will be answered in different dimensions.

    Just like Turkish provocation with downing Russian bomber didn't create war between Russia and NATO, neither will destruction of any UK ship.
    If you think shooting down a strike aircraft and sinking a major warship are equal, you are nuts!

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Ihavewaffles View Post
    Nato article 5 is defense of nato territory, not backing a nato country going outside in other lands. Like nato didn't have to invade iraq.
    Article 5 could count if a warship not engaged in hostilities and sailing in a legal manner was intentionally attacked.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •