Marvel might pretend all day The Incredible Hulk didn't happen, and despite Edward Norton being an uncooperative douche that ultimately got him kicked out through no fault of Marvel itself, I can't help but think his Hulk was much better than Ruffalo. Not just acting, but tonally, and aesthetically. It's a much more savage, and ragged Hulk, while Ruffalo's Hulk almost looks well groomed. Maybe it's Ruffalo's dopey face (Kate Winslet syndrome) but it looks goofier, too. Tonally, Norton's Hulk is also more tragic but still not too dark for the MCU.
Do you agree? Which Hulk do you like better? Norton's or Ruffalo's?