Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ...
2
3
4
  1. #61
    Guys: - We hate it when characters gET cEnSoRed but we don't care about it cuz there's porn lol!

    Also guys: - HOW DARE THEY COVER UP HER BREASTS/THIGHS/STOMACH/HIPS???? LITERALLY UNPLAYABLE!!



    I'm not buying D2 for many reasons. Characters having their skin covered up a bit is not one of said reasons. Who the fuck cares if a character shows skin or not. I can't care less even if it's a change made to a game I've played when it showed more skin.

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by LarryFromHumanResources View Post
    The game is rated seven and up and with their Disney esque trailers is pretty clear what part of their demographic is.
    Considering the card has existed for 6+ years and they also openly market a recent card as the: "First Transsexual character in Warcraft", it's not like the topic of sexuality is something they consider out of their league.

  3. #63
    Things have gone off the rails, please keep discussion on-topic folks. The current topic being discussed ain't it.

  4. #64
    Hope this garbage company goes up in flames for what they did to WC3.

  5. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by Triceron View Post

    To me, I don't see censorship at all as long as stuff like this makes it in the game, but I'm sure there's some diehard out there that's arguing they added a loincloth to the model so it's literally unplayable now.
    Good on the diablo team to stick to making a good game and listening to fans. Well, the two teams that is. Sicne D2R is Vicarious Visions. I wonder what they're gonna do after though. There's no more games to remaster after D2 right? So the classic games team they made in 2015 and VV won't have any jobs to do. I hope that they make em fix WC3 instead of absorbing them into one of the other teams or something.

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by Divada View Post
    Censored it? What did they censor? I honestly have no idea, just curious.
    More clothing on amazon butt and assassin. Other minor changes.

    It's not that this one is so bad, it's that I've become hypersensitive due to other "remakes" changing things.

  7. #67
    Quote Originally Posted by Egomaniac View Post
    Maybe you should take your own advice:
    Hence why I'm not buying it.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Queen of Hamsters View Post
    Guys: - We hate it when characters gET cEnSoRed but we don't care about it cuz there's porn lol!

    Also guys: - HOW DARE THEY COVER UP HER BREASTS/THIGHS/STOMACH/HIPS???? LITERALLY UNPLAYABLE!!



    I'm not buying D2 for many reasons. Characters having their skin covered up a bit is not one of said reasons. Who the fuck cares if a character shows skin or not. I can't care less even if it's a change made to a game I've played when it showed more skin.
    Maybe you don't - good for you.

    D2 is probably the best game of all time in my opinion and perfect in almost every way. The art is very much a part of that, and I don't want to see that diminished

  8. #68
    Remember how WC3 reforged was so bad and obviously, a shameless cashgrab basically tailor-made to shit on the company's own history to the point that everyone in this thread forgot to discuss it?
    Tonight for me is a special day. I want to go outside of the house of the girl I like with a gasoline barrel and write her name on the road and set it on fire and tell her to get out too see it (is this illegal)?

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by Th3Scourge View Post
    Hence why I'm not buying it.
    But you're still here arguing about it...hence, you haven't "moved on"

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Saltysquidoon View Post
    Remember how WC3 reforged was so bad and obviously, a shameless cashgrab basically tailor-made to shit on the company's own history to the point that everyone in this thread forgot to discuss it?
    Remember how a completely different team, one known for it's stellar work on remakes, is developing D2:R?

    WC3:R was a travesty and it has been discussed exhaustibly.

  10. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by Shakzor View Post
    This. A game just not being a 10/10 doesn't mean it was a scam. Usually it's people expecting WAY more than the devs say/show and interpret stuff different than what is said on purpose.
    Games like Pokemon or No Man's Sky for example were exactly what i expected them to be (didn't preorder NMS and only bought it way later). Pokemon just being Pokemon and No Man's Sky being a disaster at launch at obvious since they NEVER let ANYONE play before launch. They've always shown pre-made stuff and it was obvious it wouldn't be good.
    Never had problems with preordering, because i preorder when i see actual gameplay, rather than pretty render trailers. And how were MGSV and Bioshock infinite scams? I thought they were pretty well received? I remember people praising atleast Bioshock Infinite everywhere when it released.
    To be fair, with No man's sky they blatantly advertised things that were not in the final release. Multiplayer wasn't ingame on release despite being advertised multiple times and even being on the physical box cover. (Though it was covered up with a sticker)

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Egomaniac View Post
    But you're still here arguing about it...hence, you haven't "moved on"

    - - - Updated - - -



    Remember how a completely different team, one known for it's stellar work on remakes, is developing D2:R?

    WC3:R was a travesty and it has been discussed exhaustibly.
    While that may be true, my faith is so low in blizzard at this point that I would not be surprised if they found another way to fuck up a remake.

  11. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by Ticj View Post

    While that may be true, my faith is so low in blizzard at this point that I would not be surprised if they found another way to fuck up a remake.
    I'm just saying that the situations are not really that comparable...not that there is any guarantee that this product will be absolutely flawless.

  12. #72
    Barbarian looks like a soccer hooligan.
    "It's 2013 and I still view the internet on a 560x192 resolution monitor!"

  13. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by UnifiedDivide View Post
    So perfect it needed an expansion to fix a lot of shit.
    Well yeah what kind of fucking moron only considers D2 vanilla when talking about D2?

  14. #74
    Pandaren Monk cocomen2's Avatar
    5+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    1,910
    Lmao, so i must play ugly female character just because irl people love to jerk-off to sexy characters? ; then why barbarian looks like Vin Diesel , make Danny DeVito out of him! and then i would be okay with ugly and feminist friendly skin-covered amazon.
    Please, there a perfect example of hypocritical thinking:
    Quote Originally Posted by Teriz View Post
    If Tinkers had anything to do with Hunters, but they don’t. Unlike Bards which are linked to Rogues.

  15. #75
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaqwert View Post

    So yeah, the general theme is they tried to hard to age/weather the characters. All the D2 heroes besides the Necro have a very youthful appearance, you'd put them all in their 20's or 30's but the remake models all look like they are tired worn down 50 year olds.
    Well that makes sense doesn't it? They just wanted the updated characters to reflect the primary demographic that's interested in D2.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •