Page 19 of 19 FirstFirst ...
9
17
18
19
  1. #361
    If you use this as a moment to advocate your sad little crusade against cancel culture you should be utterly ashamed of yourself. We're talking sexual assaults, harassment and one individual who was driven to suicide over it. This has absolutely FUCK ALL to do with cancel culture.

  2. #362
    Quote Originally Posted by Tooshie View Post
    If you use this as a moment to advocate your sad little crusade against cancel culture you should be utterly ashamed of yourself. We're talking sexual assaults, harassment and one individual who was driven to suicide over it. This has absolutely FUCK ALL to do with cancel culture.
    Oh, I don't know. I think it's actually a great endorsement of cancel culture.
    "There is a pervasive myth that making content hard will induce players to rise to the occasion. We find the opposite. " -- Ghostcrawler
    "Sooner or later everyone sits down to a banquet of consequences." -- Robert Louis Stevenson
    If you didn't get your COVID shot it's probably too late now, you fool.

  3. #363
    Quote Originally Posted by Osmeric View Post
    Oh, I don't know. I think it's actually a great endorsement of cancel culture.
    In as much as the people screaming CANCEL CULTURE at everything don’t have a clue what they’re talking about?

  4. #364
    If you need anti-harassment training at work it just shows how bad your society has failed. This is something that your parents should have taught you, not your employer.

  5. #365
    Quote Originally Posted by rrayy View Post
    Apparently you don't know what cancel culture is. It is a mob mentality that users behavior like immediately declaring guilt to ruin lives. You can say what you want, but words have consequences. The more you do things like immediately declare guilt and scream it on social media, the closer one becomes to one day actually ruining the life of an innocent person. But you don't care because by god you are going to voicce your opinion and if it ruins an innocent person, not your problem. I hope you are never in a position where you are an innocent person on the other side of cancel culture. Because you wiill have no reason to be angry at it because after all, they were their just expressing their opinion right?
    You seem greatly confused.

    This is a civil trial, not a criminal one. This doesn't need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, just a preponderance of evidence....which this case has.

    So no, this isn't cancel culture. This is learning to treat people like human fucking beings.

  6. #366
    Over 9000! Soon-TM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Netherstorm
    Posts
    9,033
    Quote Originally Posted by hydrium View Post
    You seem greatly confused.

    This is a civil trial, not a criminal one. This doesn't need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, just a preponderance of evidence....which this case has.

    So no, this isn't cancel culture. This is learning to treat people like human fucking beings.
    Gotta love all those reverse SJWs, so to speak, who throw random buzzwords (e.g. mUh c4NceL CuLtuR3) in order to better defend corporate-senpai. After all, none of these self-proclaimed anti-cancel culture warriors gave a single &$#@ when Blizzard summarily cancelled Quinton Flynn, for example.
    If the Janitor managed to pwn Azeroth:

    Quote Originally Posted by Haidaes View Post
    "Die, wold soul of *incomprehensible mumbling* with your death my plan to *incomoprehensible mumbling* finally fullfilled and *incomprehensible mumbling*!"

  7. #367
    Quote Originally Posted by Soon-TM View Post
    Gotta love all those reverse SJWs, so to speak, who throw random buzzwords (e.g. mUh c4NceL CuLtuR3) in order to better defend corporate-senpai. After all, none of these self-proclaimed anti-cancel culture warriors gave a single &$#@ when Blizzard summarily cancelled Quinton Flynn, for example.
    Don't get me wrong, I think cancel culture is dumb as fuck and I ride comfortably aboard the fuck snowflakes feelings train.

    However there's a difference between telling someone whose feelings are hurt to suck it the fuck up and telling someone who is the subject of fucking sexual abuse/harassment to suck it up.

    Feelings are subjective, anything can offend anyone and you can't really prevent it without censoring all but the most vanilla of speech.

    Sexual harassment is pretty clearly defined, everyone knows what it is and it has no place at work.

  8. #368
    Quote Originally Posted by hydrium View Post
    You seem greatly confused.

    This is a civil trial, not a criminal one. This doesn't need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, just a preponderance of evidence....which this case has.

    So no, this isn't cancel culture. This is learning to treat people like human fucking beings.
    Wrong. They still have to prove that it like;ly happened., All it has is so far is just accusations. No actual evidence has been put forth. The state will have to put more than accusations forward during the case. What has been released is nothing more than "He said, she said". There is no preponderance of evidence because their is no evidence so far.

  9. #369
    Quote Originally Posted by rrayy View Post
    Wrong. They still have to prove that it like;ly happened., All it has is so far is just accusations. No actual evidence has been put forth. The state will have to put more than accusations forward during the case. What has been released is nothing more than "He said, she said". There is no preponderance of evidence because their is no evidence so far.
    Corroboration is all that's needed...and they have it.

    Stop trying to think you're smarter than you are.

  10. #370
    Quote Originally Posted by hydrium View Post
    Corroboration is all that's needed...and they have it.

    Stop trying to think you're smarter than you are.
    nO it's not. You still need to have physical evidence especially when that "corroboration" can be discredited under oath. That is why you get physical evidence to begin with. You can't discredit e-mail's, memos, video,audiio etc.

  11. #371
    Quote Originally Posted by rrayy View Post
    nO it's not. You still need to have physical evidence especially when that "corroboration" can be discredited under oath. That is why you get physical evidence to begin with. You can't discredit e-mail's, memos, video,audiio etc.
    You have no idea how a civil trial works.

  12. #372
    https://www.change.org/p/activision-...ard/u/29386687

    It has got to stop, let them know
    sign and share, thank you

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •