They also don't seem to get that part of its problems is based on the fact that trying to balance building up a functional civil society with maintaining a military-based empire isn't possible. All it results in is an anemic polity that has to run hard to stand still before eventually giving out when a crisis becomes sufficiently insurmountable.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Wow it's almost as if you didn't try being sufficiently liberal and democratic under Yeltsin making it not an actual argument in favor of Putainist autocracy. Shocker.
Something which annexing Ukraine will absolutely not solve, so remind me what you think the goal is here besides distracting ordinary Russian East Ukrainian people from their government's manifest incompetence and corruption?
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Foreign interventions are quite real this century though; but i wasn't even talking about them.
Financial crises create enough disruptions to stall development of "civil society" too.
You got to catch upswing as it develops and keep it going until it is sufficiently entrenched. Which didn't happen.
Once they hit troubles potential "alternative powers" went to government for handouts and got them - in exchange for being personally indebted to it.
Last edited by Shalcker; 2022-02-21 at 10:08 PM.
"Some foreign interventions happened therefore any accusations of foreign intervention are valid" isn't an argument.
PFFFFTHAHAHAHA.Financial crises create enough disruptions to stall development of "civil society" too.
ITT: The 2008 Financial Crisis, which was due to an increasingly corrupt oligarchy deregulating its financial sector, is being used as the justification for... *checks notes*.... corrupt oligarchy.
Is this what happens when you legitimately believe horseshit like "recessions are the result of Western decadence and not just a thing which happens in a market economy"? 'Cause it's fucking hilarious.
Last edited by Elegiac; 2022-02-21 at 10:12 PM.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
Still no Russian attack so far; it looks like "Zelensky declares martial law" might become true though.
- - - Updated - - -
Did US civil society actually stop any US foreign interventions?
Didn't look that way to me.
Yes, corrupt oligarchy breeds corrupt oligarchy. Shocker, i know.ITT: The 2008 Financial Crisis, which was due to an increasingly corrupt oligarchy deregulating its financial sector, is being used as the justification for... *checks notes*.... corrupt oligarchy.
Looks like it is confirmed that regular Russian troops have entered Donbas and are now in Donetsk. Nothing official yet, but funny things might happen until morning. People are going to sleep and that means less reports.
Oh yeah and "Russia is still open to dialogue with Western countries", as per Russian Foreign Ministry
Heh.
Speaking about predictions. I would say it seems lot of people knew and were right about fecal matter hitting the fan months ago. Both on Western and Russian side. I guess spy agencies did their thing (though some things were obvious).
Not a day without Shalcker twisting words and doing half-truths. The classic of classics.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi
The question that now stands open is the following; what about Odessa, Kharkiv and the rest of the regional territories of both Donetsk and Lugansk. The Ukrainians are heavily fortified in these areas and won't give them up without a fight. Mariupol on the coast of Azov nearly fell in 2014.
Originally Posted by Marjane Satrapi