if this topic seems too convoluted by now, yeah that's the point I'm trying to make:
living is better. If I were a Russian that escaped the regime and drafting, what I would do is discard my cultural identity and nationality entirely and just eke out an obscure life far away from everything.
Some people feel a greater fealty for others, knowing that fighting and succeeding, even if they die, means that others get to live better and more securely than they did.
People keeping their heads down because they're afraid for their own lives is precisely what has caused so many issues in Russia, just like in every dictatorship.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Yes, but that isn't what they do, now is it? russians dodge the draft and get out of their country, and still continue supporting Putin.
And you are still missing the point by the way. If I put a gun to your head and tell you to kill someone else or I blow your brains out, you are still a bad person if you do what I say.
Last edited by Gabriel; 2022-10-12 at 04:02 AM.
It's pretty obvious that had the Germans revolted in 1940, the German casualties and destruction of their country had been far from what it was.
Not much different in todays Russia, they'll get slaughtered in Ukraine for no purpose whatsoever. 300.000 men rioting for a regime change in Moscow is not something that can be stopped, but like you they'll chose the chickenshit route, and let children get killed in Ukraine.
And in the end you'll die anyway, you act as if life is perpetual. Apparently you'd rather live life in the gutter, than try to change it for the better. Which imo is truly a waste of a life.
Wanna know something funny? In both the Finnish and Dutch legal systems that would be considered coercion and you would if not acquitted then at least eligible for reduced sentencing.
So no, in that scenario you would not be, by definition, "still a bad person".
(I can only speak about the Dutch and Finnish systems as I only have knowledge of those two. But I imagine it works similarly in other systems.)
What, exactly, am I getting "wrong", in any way?
I know it's a hell of a lot easier to cast vague meaningless aspersions.
And if you're gonna talk about lack of fucking empathy, talk to the guy supporting authoritarian abuses and suggesting everyone should fall in line.
We're not talking about a conquered people. We're talking about the citizens who were active contributers to the Reich, and the members of the Wehrmacht, the active German military. And yes; a lot of French citizens became collaborators, for the reasons you're denying.
They were Nazis. All of them. Unless they were betraying that Reich in some form of resistance, whether violent or quiet.
That's what the word means.
Pushing anything else is ahistorical mythologizing that's generally been done to deny the responsibility for Nazi crimes against humanity falling on those who perpetrated them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_o...lean_Wehrmacht
It doesn't mean you had to be trying to murder Nazis. Hiding Jewish families, getting them papers to get them out of the Reich, performing poorly in factory work to harm the industrial machine serving the war, there were myriad ways Germans resisted the Nazis. If you just went along, though, yes. You were a Nazi. That's what the word means.