1. #29821
    Titan Yunru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    The Continent of Orsterra
    Posts
    12,272
    Well i guess russans will get demoralized now:



    This is a 6 year old video for example to compare russan side:


    But real question is if soldiers even get those in russan army at all.
    Don't sweat the details!!!

  2. #29822
    Those Russian MREs look like nasty cat food.

  3. #29823
    Quote Originally Posted by jonnysensible View Post
    meh effectiveness of a tank is based on the skillfulness of its crew and its deployment. Even those tanks are mean if used correctly.
    Skill can only take you so far in tanks these old - they were designed during ww2 to counter Tigers. The T54s began to be made in 1946. They have day-time only optic sights, poor mobility and poor armour compared to modern tanks - even the T62 is vastly superior to it. And the fuel tank is stored inside the crew compartment for added fun.

    On top of that it will strain russian logistics even more given it used yet another ammo type and has a different engine to all their other tanks. Oh, and it is the only tank in the russian service that doesn't have an autoloader. It requires a 4 man crew and a manual loader, which russians have not had any experience with for a long time.

    A couple of looks at it and the problems it will have. There is very little short of small arms that won't pop it.

    Probably they'll dig them in to use as pillboxes.
    Last edited by Corvus; 2023-03-23 at 12:47 AM.

  4. #29824
    Merely a Setback Kaleredar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    phasing...
    Posts
    25,187
    Quote Originally Posted by jonnysensible View Post
    meh effectiveness of a tank is based on the skillfulness of its crew and its deployment. Even those tanks are mean if used correctly.
    I mean, hasn't Russia taken catastrophic losses to their tank divisions?

    I doubt they have a "secret super experienced skilled tank guys" just waiting in the wings at this point.
    “Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
    Quote Originally Posted by Wells View Post
    Kaleredar is right...
    Words to live by.

  5. #29825
    Herald of the Titans Iphie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Suomi/Nederland
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaleredar View Post
    I mean, hasn't Russia taken catastrophic losses to their tank divisions?

    I doubt they have a "secret super experienced skilled tank guys" just waiting in the wings at this point.
    Yep...their First Guards Tank Army, the elite of the elite, has been destroyed 3 times already (after reconstitution). It ran at Kharkiv and left a lot of good equipment behind.

  6. #29826
    Quote Originally Posted by Iphie View Post
    Yep...their First Guards Tank Army, the elite of the elite, has been destroyed 3 times already (after reconstitution). It ran at Kharkiv and left a lot of good equipment behind.
    Lord help us if they start conscripting War Thunder or World of Tanks players. Let the lads pew pew in their waifu skinned digital tanks, Vlad.

  7. #29827
    Quote Originally Posted by Corvus View Post
    Skill can only take you so far in tanks these old - they were designed during ww2 to counter Tigers. The T54s began to be made in 1946. They have day-time only optic sights, poor mobility and poor armour compared to modern tanks - even the T62 is vastly superior to it. And the fuel tank is stored inside the crew compartment for added fun.

    On top of that it will strain russian logistics even more given it used yet another ammo type and has a different engine to all their other tanks. Oh, and it is the only tank in the russian service that doesn't have an autoloader. It requires a 4 man crew and a manual loader, which russians have not had any experience with for a long time.

    A couple of looks at it and the problems it will have. There is very little short of small arms that won't pop it.

    Probably they'll dig them in to use as pillboxes.
    the best tank is one that can kill all armoured threats with a single shot. Which is all of them.

    the better crew with better C4ISR and a worse tank will kill a worse crew with a better tank.

    In ukraine most tank engagements ive seen are below 1km and i have only seen a handful of tank vs tank engagements.

    those tanks are fine, but if you use them like idiots and you crew sucks (which seems to be a thing with russians) you are in trouble, better to have them than not.

  8. #29828
    Herald of the Titans Iphie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Suomi/Nederland
    Posts
    2,647
    Just realised, those T-55 and T-54 tank designs are older than putin himself. That country is really a joke.

  9. #29829
    Scarab Lord Zaydin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    FL, USA
    Posts
    4,584
    Quote Originally Posted by Iphie View Post
    Just realised, those T-55 and T-54 tank designs are older than putin himself. That country is really a joke.
    And they will be extremely vulnerable to any remotely modern AT weapons. Hell, they will be vulnerable to AT weapons that are 30-40 years old.
    "If you are ever asking yourself 'Is Trump lying or is he stupid?', the answer is most likely C: All of the Above" - Seth Meyers

  10. #29830
    Herald of the Titans Iphie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Suomi/Nederland
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Zaydin View Post
    And they will be extremely vulnerable to any remotely modern AT weapons. Hell, they will be vulnerable to AT weapons that are 30-40 years old.
    Yeah, those DU shots aren't even going to be needed. (I'm kinda iffy on those anyway.)

  11. #29831
    Quote Originally Posted by Corvus View Post
    Skill can only take you so far in tanks these old - they were designed during ww2 to counter Tigers.
    All you had to do to counter a Tiger column was to fall back half a mile to a mile. The Tigers would then run out of fuel or breakdown. German logistics couldn't keep them up and running.. Mustangs were great at killing those sitting ducks too!

  12. #29832
    It's the Ukranians saying this so take it with a grain of salt (for morale reasons), but the Russians are apparently very worn out in Bahkmut despite reports earlier this month on their breakthroughs. The Ukrainians say a "big" counterattack is coming in response.
    "Truth...justice, honor, freedom! Vain indulgences, every one(...) I know what I want, and I take it. I take advantage of whatever I can, and discard that which I cannot. There is no room for sentiment or guilt."

  13. #29833
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    It's the Ukranians saying this so take it with a grain of salt (for morale reasons), but the Russians are apparently very worn out in Bahkmut despite reports earlier this month on their breakthroughs. The Ukrainians say a "big" counterattack is coming in response.
    worn out and having made a (tiny) breakthrough are not mutually exclusive in any way. Considering the severity of the fighting both sides there not being very worn out would be highly unlikely.
    It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death

  14. #29834
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    It's the Ukranians saying this so take it with a grain of salt (for morale reasons), but the Russians are apparently very worn out in Bahkmut despite reports earlier this month on their breakthroughs. The Ukrainians say a "big" counterattack is coming in response.
    some brutal videos coming out of bahkmut seen multiple russians commiting suicide as drones drop grenades on them

  15. #29835
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorsameth View Post
    worn out and having made a (tiny) breakthrough are not mutually exclusive in any way. Considering the severity of the fighting both sides there not being very worn out would be highly unlikely.
    What happens if the Russians lose Bahkmut, though? Remember that although he's evil as fuck, the Wagner leader believably explained the strategic importance of maintaining Bahkmut to the Russians - and how fucked they are if they can't.
    "Truth...justice, honor, freedom! Vain indulgences, every one(...) I know what I want, and I take it. I take advantage of whatever I can, and discard that which I cannot. There is no room for sentiment or guilt."

  16. #29836
    Quote Originally Posted by Iphie View Post
    Just realised, those T-55 and T-54 tank designs are older than putin himself. That country is really a joke.
    Those are literal WW2 tanks, as in designed during WW2.
    Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.

    "People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988

  17. #29837
    Herald of the Titans Iphie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Suomi/Nederland
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    What happens if the Russians lose Bahkmut, though? Remember that although he's evil as fuck, the Wagner leader believably explained the strategic importance of maintaining Bahkmut to the Russians - and how fucked they are if they can't.
    1. To lose something you must first have it, this is not the case.
    2. Prig has already said if shit goes tits up he'll just leave if he doesn't get support.
    3. there are rumours prig is going to focus on Africa in any case due to feeling betrayed.
    4. the MoD forces are apparently moving to the Kreminna-Lyman direction.

    5. Absolutely unconfirmed and blatantly insane: prig apparently wrote a letter to the US government offering to go focus on something else...for the right price and support.

  18. #29838
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    What happens if the Russians lose Bahkmut, though? Remember that although he's evil as fuck, the Wagner leader believably explained the strategic importance of maintaining Bahkmut to the Russians - and how fucked they are if they can't.
    they move back to their next positions, and have a propaganda loss.

    Prig is already being told to fuck off and focus on his africa shenanigans (i.e looting african metals for 2 billion a year?)

  19. #29839
    so do you people really undermine the importance of Bahkmut? I assumed if the Russians lost this one, they would essentially be a decapitated army (i.e total inhouse chaos and defeated, but still existing)
    "Truth...justice, honor, freedom! Vain indulgences, every one(...) I know what I want, and I take it. I take advantage of whatever I can, and discard that which I cannot. There is no room for sentiment or guilt."

  20. #29840
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    so do you people really undermine the importance of Bahkmut? I assumed if the Russians lost this one, they would essentially be a decapitated army (i.e total inhouse chaos and defeated, but still existing)
    Bahkmut is utterly unimportant. It has no strategic value and the only reason its in the news is because its where Wagner decided to have their main thrust and they are the only ones that have made any progress at all by throwing waves of meat at the problem.

    Outside of PR the cost of losing Bahkmut is the same as long anywhere else along the front line. It risks a breakthrough and who knows how the Russians will be able to recover from that. If they are organised its fine, if not then the entire front could crumble.
    It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •