1. #29841
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    so do you people really undermine the importance of Bahkmut? I assumed if the Russians lost this one, they would essentially be a decapitated army (i.e total inhouse chaos and defeated, but still existing)
    bahkmut for the russians means they can threaten Kramatorsk and Sloviansk. Ukraine staying there means they can inflict heavy attrition to Russian forces and protect Kramatorsk and Sloviansk. It really isn't that important in terms of location, but its become a propaganda war.

    The Russians have hyped it up and now they have to take or they do look stupid (which is a really bad way to wage a war) and they would have to take it at some point anyway.

    The Ukranians don't really want to lose it for propaganda reasons, they can inflict heavy damage to whatever russia chucks in there and they are sort of saying 'we could go back to our next postions, and then if that goes badly go back to our next positions and eventually go back to kyiv...but why bother with going all the way back to kyiv why not make out stand here?'

  2. #29842
    Beyond the propaganda value, Bakhmut is a railroad junction.

  3. #29843
    the reason I understandably have skepticism about its supposed iffy importance is that even Ukrainian intel has stated the fighting in Bahkmut is the bloodiest and most awful for a while now, with a ridiculous mortality rate relative to elsewhere.

    Why would Ukraine fight so hard for this place? I doubt they've suffered minor losses with all that's been said.
    "Truth...justice, honor, freedom! Vain indulgences, every one(...) I know what I want, and I take it. I take advantage of whatever I can, and discard that which I cannot. There is no room for sentiment or guilt."

  4. #29844
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    the reason I understandably
    "Understandably" my butt!

  5. #29845
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    the reason I understandably have skepticism about its supposed iffy importance is that even Ukrainian intel has stated the fighting in Bahkmut is the bloodiest and most awful for a while now, with a ridiculous mortality rate relative to elsewhere.

    Why would Ukraine fight so hard for this place? I doubt they've suffered minor losses with all that's been said.
    your wondering why the fighting is most intense at the main pressure point of the Russian attack?

    If they were not fighting this hard at Bahkmut they would be fighting this hard at whatever other point Russia chooses to attack at. The intensity wouldn't change, just the location.
    It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death

  6. #29846
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post

    Why would Ukraine fight so hard for this place? I doubt they've suffered minor losses with all that's been said.
    Because if the Russians want to throw countless lives and endless resources into a completely meaningless objective it's convenient for the Ukrainians to fight there instead of somewhere where there's something worthwhile to lose.

    Losing Bakhmut would ultimately not change anything strategically for Ukraine, on the other hand holding Bakhmut would kill countless Russians and humiliate them.

    This is not rocket science, this has been repeated over and over and over and over and over again over the last 5 months. Like on what planet were you? The Russians have no greater plan here, no special strategic insight, no hidden card, nothing. They are just doing what they have been doing for the past 13 months, stupid shit.

    What western commentators got wrong, again, was believing that the Russians would eventually take Bakhmut, but Ukrainians in a typical Ukrainian fashion seem to have held onto it, despite every expectation. With other words, 5 months of fighting and countless losses later, Russia once again...FAILED.

  7. #29847
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    the reason I understandably have skepticism about its supposed iffy importance is that even Ukrainian intel has stated the fighting in Bahkmut is the bloodiest and most awful for a while now, with a ridiculous mortality rate relative to elsewhere.

    Why would Ukraine fight so hard for this place? I doubt they've suffered minor losses with all that's been said.
    Because that's where they get to kill the most russians and destroy the most russian equipment. D'uh.

  8. #29848
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Because that's where they get to kill the most russians and destroy the most russian equipment. D'uh.
    an honorable thing in and of itself

  9. #29849
    Quote Originally Posted by enigma77 View Post
    an honorable thing in and of itself
    Let me be clear so nobody gets to bitch at me about this: I meant russian invaders. I'm not advocating for the genocide of all russians.

  10. #29850
    Herald of the Titans Iphie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Suomi/Nederland
    Posts
    2,667
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Let me be clear so nobody gets to bitch at me about this: I meant russian invaders. I'm not advocating for the genocide of all russians.
    Going soft in your old day? (DW I know you never advocated it, but I know of a fair few Finns who make no such distinction.)

  11. #29851
    Quote Originally Posted by Iphie View Post
    Going soft in your old day? (DW I know you never advocated it, but I know of a fair few Finns who make no such distinction.)
    I've been infracted for less.

  12. #29852
    Herald of the Titans
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dual US/Canada
    Posts
    2,556
    I think most people would agree that any russian currently in Bahkmut is fair game. I suspect an extreme lack of peaceful civilian interaction left in that particular area.

  13. #29853
    So Prigozhin went fully against the Kremlin narrative it seems. Reporting that there's no NATO in Ukraine, no Nazis. Just Ukrainians and volunteers. Also that those in power were deluded if they ever thought NATO wouldn't supply Kyiv with weapons to defend itself.

  14. #29854
    Quote Originally Posted by Kallisto View Post
    So Prigozhin went fully against the Kremlin narrative it seems. Reporting that there's no NATO in Ukraine, no Nazis. Just Ukrainians and volunteers. Also that those in power were deluded if they ever thought NATO wouldn't supply Kyiv with weapons to defend itself.
    I’ve seen this rumor, but haven’t found a primary source. Ya got some of that good stuff?

  15. #29855
    Herald of the Titans Iphie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Suomi/Nederland
    Posts
    2,667
    Quote Originally Posted by Veggie50 View Post
    I’ve seen this rumor, but haven’t found a primary source. Ya got some of that good stuff?
    Let's start with these:

    https://www.ukrainianworldcongress.o...is-in-ukraine/

    https://www.euronews.com/2023/03/24/...nazi-narrative


    (granted these are probably biased but it is out there.)

    And this one:

    https://twitter.com/TheStudyofWar/st...03504932274181

  16. #29856
    Terribly sorry to hear about his upcoming accident.

    The good ones always go too soon.

  17. #29857
    India complains that Russia isn't delivering weapons it owes because it's throwing everything at Ukraine

    The Indian Air Force disclosed this week to its parliament that a "major delivery" contracted from Russia would not be showing up.


    Nuff said.

  18. #29858
    Think Russia is offering partial refunds for delayed deliveries? I'm honestly surprised that Russia didn't sell them stripped down hardware and then blame them for losing the missing parts.

  19. #29859
    Quote Originally Posted by Edge- View Post
    Think Russia is offering partial refunds for delayed deliveries? I'm honestly surprised that Russia didn't sell them stripped down hardware and then blame them for losing the missing parts.
    I think the answer ranges from "not likely" to "when hell freezes over."

    Meanwhile, Czech citizens raise €1.2m to send rocket launcher and 365 missiles to Ukraine.

    Within a few weeks, a RМ-70 rocket launcher along and 365 missiles will be transferred to Ukraine from the Czech Republic. However, this is not part of and aid package from the government, but is the result of €1.2 million donations made by Czech citizens.

    The launcher can fire 40 missiles in 90 seconds and can reload exceptionally quickly.


    - - - Updated - - -

    We'll see who will run out of artillery first.

    The European Union's top diplomat says the 27-nation bloc and Norway have endorsed a fast-track procedure to supply badly-needed artillery shells to Ukraine

    Borrell said that he had won approval for his proposal to provide 1 billion euros ($1.1 billion) to encourage member nations to provide artillery shells from their stocks and any orders for new rounds that they might have placed with industry.

    A further 1 billion euros would also be used to fast-track new orders and encourage countries to work together on those purchases through the EDA or in groups of at least three nations. Germany has already called for countries to join its own effort, which Berlin believes will go faster.

    The third track of the program involves support to Europe’s defense industry. so that it can ramp up production in the longer term. EU officials have said that new joint orders could be placed by May if the plan is endorsed in its entirety.


    EU defense industry has lagged behind the US. This may be the shot that it needs to rejuvenate the industry.

  20. #29860
    Stuff like this also has the added benefit of more and more countries turning to the US for their defensive needs, the less countries in Russia/China's sphere of influence the better. It is just staggering out badly Russia has botched this entire thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •