Guess that's a risk when you don't have proper GPS systems and tape a civilian road satnav to your dashboard.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Um...it's been a while since I've looked at standard armed forces loadout, but isn't the average soldier carrying like 10-25 kilograms of weapons, armor, and supplies? Even if the cold wasn't a factor, wouldn't they pretty much have to drop their kit just to survive the swim?
There's also a question of just how many of these soldiers aren't per say casualties but rather troops that "leaked" out of the Russian military and into groups like...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_(company)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redut_(company)
Why die for a couple of hundred dollars a month when you go can work for Shoigu directly and get paid 6k a month?
I think you should survive landing in water, since afaik your backpack is supposed to be airtight (if you are airborne unit) and it acts as a flotation device, but if you are not wearing a wet/dry suit when you land in freezing salt water... It's ripperino in pepperinos.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...ments-discord/
Not surprising in the slightest, but good to see it be officially in the open.China approved “provision of lethal aid” to Russia in its war in Ukraine earlier this year and planned to disguise military equipment as civilian items, according to a U.S. intercept of Russian intelligence revealed in leaked secret documents.
The intercept, apparently obtained through U.S. eavesdropping on Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), was included in a top-secret summary, dated Feb. 23, of recent Ukraine- and Russia-related “products” compiled by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. It was among a number of previously unreported documents that The Washington Post obtained from a trove of images of classified files posted on a private server on the chat app Discord.
According to “signals intelligence,” the intelligence summary said, the SVR reported that China’s Central Military Commission had “approved the incremental provision” of weapons and wanted it kept secret. The report did not indicate the source of the SVR’s information.
If it wasn't obvious from the way China tries to pretend to be a peacemaker by calling for a ceasefire so Russia can regroup, recover and rearm themselves, it is now.
"My successes are my own, but my failures are due to extremist leftist liberals" - Party of Personal Responsibility
Prediction for the future
Because it actually takes time in between making agreements to send weapons and doing the due diligence on logistics to send weapons.
And you would be really naive to believe China is above sending weapons to Russia behind everyone's backs when they have zero credibility both internationally and intranationally.
"My successes are my own, but my failures are due to extremist leftist liberals" - Party of Personal Responsibility
Prediction for the future
We're 3 months down the road from the alleged agreement, if they were going to supply they'd had ample time to do so by now. Furthermore, just today China vowed not to sell arms to either side in the war, so you know, whatcha gonna believe, the info 3 months out of date or the new info?
As for China's credibility? It sure as hell is a lot more than russia's though that's a low bar to clear.