He flew to Japan aboard a French airforce plane.
And when leaving the Netherlands he used a Dutch plane.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
I don't think the planes and their allegiances have anything to do with his safety, it's just the security and secrecy that does that.
If Zelenksy were unsecurely and publicly flying place to place, regardless of that plane's allegiances (NATO, etc), I 100% assure Russia will try to down it and then say they didn't do it. We KNOW they've done this before.
It's called an AEROPLANE, a big metal tube that flies in the sky.
- - - Updated - - -
No. Russia is not going to try to shoot down a plane in international airspace or SOMEONE ELSE'S airspace. Especially if it's a diplomatic flight that is probably flying under the flag of third country.
I know you think Russia is "stronk", but even assuming they could somehow shoot a plane down halfway across the world (which they can't) they wouldn't.
China did actually allow him to fly over China.
Not just China, but Myanmar as well. You know, pooties 'allies'.
https://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/...972626432?s=20
On top of that, China held a central Asian summit, where all the nations pledged tighter co-operation and development. Russia wasn't invited. Yeah, russia has lost central Asia to China.
on a side note : https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...P=share_btn_tw
anyone killing russian/wagner troops, assassinating russian regime propagandists and attacking russian war infrastructure is a hero. (including partisan russians!)
does russian rhetoric mean anything anymore? I mean they keep saying something about how the West has crossed the line, but it seems fruitless to post context without action
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Curious question, we all know NK is leashed by China, so all of their supportive bluster is worth what in the end?
As for Central Asia, russia is now truly surrounded and one of the blocs surrounding it is led by a ruthless capitalist who just got russia to give concessions with regards to Vladivostok.
They ask "Does russian rhetoric mean anything anymore?" like once every other week. Desperate for any answer but the one that we all know to be true.
- - - Updated - - -
Their bluster has some value. You have to keep in mind that China has no problem with Russia being aided, they just don't want to get sanctioned themselves for doing it. So NK sending weaponry is just fine, and I wouldn't be surprised if China is slipping in a few boxes of superconductors and microchips at way above premium prices under the table. (But then, I wouldn't be surprised to find US companies doing the same either. We are the world's premier arms dealer.)
After hundreds of "Bakhmut is captured by vatniks" propaganda posting spree, it seems it now may be fully under Russian occupation.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...ut-2023-05-21/
Although not much later, this:HIROSHIMA, Japan, May 21 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy appeared to confirm the loss of the city of Bakhmut to Russia on Sunday, when asked if it remained in Kyiv's control.
"I think no," he said ahead of a meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden in Japan. "For today, Bakhmut is only in our hearts."
Russia claimed on Saturday to have fully captured the smashed eastern Ukrainian city, which if true would mark an end to the longest and bloodiest battle of the 15-month war.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...ut-2023-05-21/
Be it whatever, at least the rather militarily insignificant city was a meatgrinder for the orcs, but if Bakhmut is now taken fully, the same meatgrinder will just change places. Brace for impact, russian propaganda posting will be using this as great victory nonetheless.KYIV, May 21 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy did not confirm the capture by Russian forces of the besieged eastern Ukrainian city of Bakhmut, his spokesman said on Sunday.
"Reporter's question: Russians said they have taken Bakhmut," Sergii Nykyforov wrote on Facebook. "President's reply: I think no."
He added in Ukrainian: "In this way, the president denied the capture of Bakhmut."
Silver lining for me is that if this is true, then the West may as well agree to send even better equipment in all forms to ensure russian defeat and re-claiming all Ukrainian land.