Our entire earlier conversation was about how "Strategic objectives are determined by internal politics." And I am pointing out that both parties here would have politically logical reason for doing this. Ukraine's objective would be to make the Russian population realize that they are in fact at war and aren't out of harms way, and to prove that "Daddy Putin" can't protect them. And Russia could want to use this as an excuse to motivate the Russian population which isn't very keen on this war, and Russia has in the past used lethal internal false flags for the exact same reason.
So at this junction, either side could still be responsible.
- - - Updated - - -
They haven't defied their benefactors. Assuming they did it.
Ukraine maintains plausible deniability so far. If anyone will take recognition it will be one of the Ukraine sponsored Russian partisan groups and the hardware used will likely be something commercially available and modified, nothing that will have a big USAF/RAF/Ukrainian Air Force sticker on it.
NATO's conditions were for Ukraine not to use NATO donated hardware inside Russia.
Even in Belgorod, those Humvees etc weren't operated under Ukrainian flag, they were operated by Russian partisans, so TECHNICALLY there was no rule breaking there.

Recent Blue Posts
Recent Forum Posts
Developer Insight: Hearthsteel Virtual Currency and Housing in Midnight
Weakaura Help if then statement
MMO-Champion


Reply With Quote







