1. #31581
    Quote Originally Posted by Cynical Asshole View Post
    That's not gonna happen until Putin does something really stupid, like using nukes.
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    I want it to happen.
    And this is why nobody takes you seriously.
    “There you stand, the good man doing nothing. And while evil triumphs, and your rigid pacifism crumbles to blood stained dust, the only victory afforded to you is that you stuck true to your guns.”

  2. #31582
    Quote Originally Posted by Ulmita View Post
    That's WW3 right there. My guess is that the US will try to cool the hot heads and avoid such catastrophe.
    Kind like Russia was going to NOOOOOOK the moment someone attacker Russia proper? Woops.

  3. #31583
    It's either NATO keeps doing nothing and innocents and animals keep dying horrible deaths while Russia mocks its supposed powerlessness

    ...or NATO intervenes, annihilates the Russian invaders, then challenges Putin's pathetic bluff

    I prefer the second, sorry.

  4. #31584
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Kind like Russia was going to NOOOOOOK the moment someone attacker Russia proper? Woops.
    I mean blowing up the dam and drowning Kyiv will cost as many lives as a nuclear attack would. They have already leveled several towns and small cities.

  5. #31585
    Banned Cynical Asshole's Avatar
    1+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Location
    Bucharest. Romania.
    Posts
    1,566
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    I want it to happen so this is over already. All of it. It's pretty clear the Kakhovka was the tipping point for NATO's rage. They don't want something of this disaster in particular happening again, and that's understandable.
    The thing about nuclear war is that you shouldn't weep for those who died, you should weep for those who survived.

  6. #31586
    Quote Originally Posted by Cynical Asshole View Post
    The thing about nuclear war is that you shouldn't weep for those who died, you should weep for those who survived.
    I'd mostly weep for those who die, just not immediately

  7. #31587
    Banned Cynical Asshole's Avatar
    1+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Location
    Bucharest. Romania.
    Posts
    1,566
    Quote Originally Posted by Nymrohd View Post
    I'd mostly weep for those who die, just not immediately
    I would prefer being vaporized than having to survive through the following holocaust.

  8. #31588
    Quote Originally Posted by Cynical Asshole View Post
    I would prefer being vaporized than having to survive through the following holocaust.
    Yeah me too. I am mostly refering to the people who die to the fallout from radiation poisoning, that seems like a horrible and slow death.

  9. #31589
    Quote Originally Posted by YUPPIE View Post
    It's either NATO keeps doing nothing and innocents and animals keep dying horrible deaths while Russia mocks its supposed powerlessness

    ...or NATO intervenes, annihilates the Russian invaders, then challenges Putin's pathetic bluff

    I prefer the second, sorry.
    Yes because we know you want WW3, even before this war started you were crying about a lack of world war for you to die and take all of us with you in.

  10. #31590
    Quote Originally Posted by Cynical Asshole View Post
    I would prefer being vaporized than having to survive through the following holocaust.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nymrohd View Post
    Yeah me too. I am mostly refering to the people who die to the fallout from radiation poisoning, that seems like a horrible and slow death.
    Don't do this to me. Aftermath of nuclear war discussion is my trigger brah.

  11. #31591
    As we all know from previous experience, discussion of nuclear destruction is a distraction that tends to throw the discussion off. Please stick to events and realistic speculations.

  12. #31592
    Truth be told, I'm a bit baffled that the current signs point towards Ukraine trying to push towards Luhanks and Donetsk. I would have imagined their next step was to cut the land bridge to Crimea.

  13. #31593
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Truth be told, I'm a bit baffled that the current signs point towards Ukraine trying to push towards Luhanks and Donetsk. I would have imagined their next step was to cut the land bridge to Crimea.
    If you can imagine it, so can the enemy.

  14. #31594
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowferal View Post
    If you can imagine it, so can the enemy.
    Luhansk and Donetsk are also the most heavily fortified areas.

  15. #31595
    Quote Originally Posted by Ulmita View Post
    That's WW3 right there. My guess is that the US will try to cool the hot heads and avoid such catastrophe.
    Hard disagree. There should be an international coalition formed to push Russia out of Ukraine. I believe in Russian red lines at this point as much as I believe Putin telling the people they are winning. Every single thing that bowing down to their many-times crossed red lines have only caused one thing; More Ukrainian suffering over prolonging the war in fear of some never-coming retaliation. Russia has no means to respond to a coalition force working inside Ukraine. Hell, that force doesn't even have to partake in battles but protect key areas and borders to free Ukrainian troops to do the fighting. Time to fear Russia is over.

    They would have only one response and they are not going to do it.
    Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.

    "People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988

  16. #31596
    Banned Cynical Asshole's Avatar
    1+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Location
    Bucharest. Romania.
    Posts
    1,566
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilian View Post
    Hard disagree. There should be an international coalition formed to push Russia out of Ukraine. I believe in Russian red lines at this point as much as I believe Putin telling the people they are winning. Every single thing that bowing down to their many-times crossed red lines have only caused one thing; More Ukrainian suffering over prolonging the war in fear of some never-coming retaliation. Russia has no means to respond to a coalition force working inside Ukraine. Hell, that force doesn't even have to partake in battles but protect key areas and borders to free Ukrainian troops to do the fighting. Time to fear Russia is over.

    They would have only one response and they are not going to do it.
    What coalition other than NATO? Russia already named NATO and basically the entire West as its main enemy.

    You want Japan to send troops?

  17. #31597
    Pandaren Monk
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,858
    Quote Originally Posted by Cynical Asshole View Post
    What coalition other than NATO? Russia already named NATO and basically the entire West as its main enemy.

    You want Japan to send troops?
    If you read the Guardian article posted earlier, it was about NATO MEMBER COUNTRIES sending troops, individually, not official NATO troops.

    In the article's case, Poland would happily form a new coalition to ensure Ukraine's sovereignty - probably after this war ends, not during it, in my opinion.

  18. #31598
    The Lightbringer Iphie's Avatar
    15+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Suomi/Nederland
    Posts
    3,279
    Quote Originally Posted by Gabriel View Post
    Truth be told, I'm a bit baffled that the current signs point towards Ukraine trying to push towards Luhanks and Donetsk. I would have imagined their next step was to cut the land bridge to Crimea.
    In a way it is cutting the land bridge... just more ambitious than expected.

  19. #31599
    Quote Originally Posted by Cynical Asshole View Post
    What coalition other than NATO? Russia already named NATO and basically the entire West as its main enemy.

    You want Japan to send troops?
    Coalition of the willing. It does not have to be NATO operation.
    Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.

    "People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988

  20. #31600
    Banned Cynical Asshole's Avatar
    1+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Aug 2022
    Location
    Bucharest. Romania.
    Posts
    1,566
    Quote Originally Posted by Wilian View Post
    Coalition of the willing. It does not have to be NATO operation.
    Yeah...kinda hard to sell war to your own people when they are not directly affected.

    Spending public money to assist Ukraine is one thing, sending soldiers to die is a whole different thing and it won't be seen favorably by the voters. Once those body bags start arriving, and the mothers and wives start appearing crying on TV, the percentages of the current party in power will drop like a rock in a pond.

    I mean Bush Jr. had to demolish two tall towers with people still inside them in order to motivate people to support his aggressive oil drilling in another country.
    Last edited by Cynical Asshole; 2023-06-08 at 12:52 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •