When time comes China will swallow Taiwan whole and nothing US or anyone else will be able to do with it.
I estimate it happening in a decade or two at most.
No, it wouldn't. America is too fat and complacent to engage in a serious conflict.
- - - Updated - - -
No, because America is not gonna do shit.
Like...why do you think Putin had the balls to upset the world's balance by attacking Ukraine? Cause Biden's America is not gonna do shit besides throw money at the situation. America is too weak to call Putin's bluff by sending NATO troops into Ukraine and inviting Putin to shoot at them, and Putin knows that and so does Xi Jin Ping, and Iran has seen that too.
Nobody takes Biden seriously. They all know he's a weak and senile old man who ain't gonna do jackshit.
Maybe if Trump becomes president he will make a display of force to make the world's enemies respect America again.
Last edited by Cynical Asshole; 2023-06-12 at 04:01 PM.
I believe Putin's actions as a whole have emboldened the most powerful (resourceful) dictators like Xi, Kim, and Khamenei. The fact that he has nukes and that deterrent alone is enough to keep NATO at arm's length as he commits atrocity after atrocity after atrocity of little consequence.
Eventually, what would stop the other aforementioned from invading other smaller nations with that deterrent in mind?
It's nothing to do with fat and complacent, but the same reason why NATO does not go to war with Russia over Ukraine.
You won't be able to sell it to the constituents: "We gotta go send our bois fight China over some island half a globe away". Any party that would try to propose that crap, won't see White House or congress for a decade.
The best thing West and US can do about it is negotiate with maybe somehow making it Hong Kong 2.0, while building capacities and capabilities to replace what will eventually be lost in Taiwan.
Last edited by zealo; 2023-06-12 at 04:27 PM.
NATO isn't going to war with Russia for the simple reason that it's getting everything it wants from just supplying Ukraine with more guns then they can carry.
The point of NATO was never to conquer Russia it was to ensure Russia would not be a threat to a combined alliance, and Russia destroying its own military in Ukraine accomplishes that.
I hope you're posting this from the front lines as a volunteer fighter.
Otherwise this reads like a bunch of empty "big man" talk where you weirdly cheerlead a guy who couldn't serve because he was too rich taking the United States into another war. Which is a weird position.
I mean I assumed Ukraine would fall in the first few weeks of the war, but that was before we all got to see just how bad corruption had destroyed the Russian military. Everyone know it existed but even really good intelligence agencies seem to have been surprised.
Honestly that likely played a part in why the west was a bit slow off the mark to provide aid, this isn't a mistake we are likely to make with Taiwan.
So you are complaining that NATO - a defensive pact, is not going to fight for country that is not one of it's members? And you say that throwing "money at the situation" is meaningless? That all the equipment and intel from USA and others didn't help Ukrainians? And are you saying that Trump, the guy with isolationist politics preaching a stop to military interventions and with constant attempts at Putin bromance, the same guy who can't to this day decisively admit that Russia is the aggressor, will somehow do a "show of force"? Wow dude, what are you even smoking at this point?
Last edited by Makabreska; 2023-06-12 at 05:05 PM.
Sometimes, the light of the moon is a key to other spaces. I've found a place where, for a night or two, the streets curve in unfamiliar ways. If I walk here, I might find insight, or I might be touched by madness.