
Troll farms carpet-bomb the internet regardless of how "low-tier" a forum is. I won't comment on whether or not I think we have an infestation here, but to categorically claim there's no way they are present here is pretty much on par with claiming they are. Even odds either way.
So instead of speculating just report the stupid trolling propagandists and move on. And if the mods don't get off their fucking asses and ban the low-post count ban-evading alt accounts/propagandists then that's pretty much how it is around here these days anyway.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.

I'm more inclined to lean towards petty, as is usually the case with these kinda folks. But I think getting way into the weeds in speculating the legitimacy of our local shit-stirrers is against forum rules or something so we can just move on until they show up again with more brickheaded 'peace talk' takes.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.

The purpose of troll farms is to create self propagating misinformation.
Once the ball gets rolling the distinction between the troll and the person propagating it becomes practically meaningless.
So simply labelling the person propagating the troll farm propaganda as a troll themselves can be effective for highlighting that they are spouting bullshit.

If nothing else, it's sometimes difficult to parse people who actually believe in whack-a-do nonsense with actual malicious actors so we're stuck having to skirt and play nice with them until they snap and get themselves banned because they can't help themselves. So better to err on the side of generalization than risk getting banned over calling a spade a spade when it might just have been a more modest yet still incredibly shovel shaped trowel instead.
Yeah, turns out, Minsk 1 and 2 were pushed around by corrupt okrainian government, who were not going to stick to said Agreements from the get-go, anyway, as attested to by both the-then president of okraine Pytor Porosenko and the-then german chancellor Angela Merkel.
- - - Updated - - -
...or you could engage a witch hunt.
What if I am a troll, or you?
No, I meant before Russia invaded in 2022.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia...ban_in_Ukraine
https://www.france24.com/en/20180920...ks-controversy
The move was criticized, even by criticized by the West. Isn't this cultural genocide? Is it acceptable? Or it is okay because Ukraine is the "good guy"?
So, pray tell, what is the fact? That Russia invaded Ukraine just because one fine day it felt like grabbing more land, that the West had no role to play in the events leading up to February 2022? Your bias against Russia blinds you.
Check out John Mearsheimer, a renowned international relations scholar from the US. He offers an objective perspective on the Ukrainian crisis, criticizing the West for antagonizing Russia since the end of the Cold War. One of main points is that NATO has been continuously expanding into Eastern Europe, incorporating several countries that were once part of the USSR. This is a point of contention between the US and Russia, dating back to the 1990s when Boris Yeltsin clashed with Bill Clinton over it after USSR collapsed.
Mearsheimer also suggests that if China were to establish a military alliance and include Mexico and Canada, the United States would unquestionably be upset. In the context of Ukraine-Russia relations, a central concern is NATO's efforts to include Ukraine in its alliance, similar to the example made about China.
https://oxfordpoliticalreview.com/20...ar-in-ukraine/
I am not saying Putin is right for invading Ukraine; he is wrong, and nothing justifies the invasion (as much as you insist that I am justifying it, I am not, but hey, you do you). However, do consider a different perspective; there are two sides to every coin.
With the presence of numerous NATO bases in close proximity to Russia, the USA's penchant for war, and the outcome of a survey conducted across over 60 countries that identified the USA as the biggest threat to world peace. When considering these factors, it's no wonder why Putin perceives the situation (NATO expansion) as problematic.
Like you, I am a fan of sources:
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article...cording-to-a-p
https://www.ilcambiamento.it/files/G...ernational.pdf
But the war isn't just about Russia and Ukraine; it is also about US aggression and NATO expansion. The US is a party in this war, and it is important to acknowledge America's propensity for aggression and why Russia is threatened by NATO. The US is not an innocent party. Before I am accused of victim blaming (lol) again, let me reiterate that nothing justifies Russia's invasion, yet neither NATO nor the USA are innocent parties (nor is Russia). Ukraine is the victim here as a result of Russia and the West's failed foreign policy.
Last edited by TrueNeutral; 2023-11-27 at 11:19 AM.
Thank you for a well-though response, but I'll just cut it down to this bit.
I would like to ponder on victimhood of okraine here. Undeniably, okraine is a victim of being played by usa, on that we can agreee.
Did okraine not actively try to side with usa, nato and eu? Did okraine not receive warnings about consequences of such a course of actions?
So okraine knew of the consequences, was willing, and decided to go with it, anyway.
Does it not put the responsibilities of okrainian government's action on okraine?

Seems like some posters are on a hyperdrive initiative. Kremlin talking points resume instantly after the ban has expired
How far Ukraine has pushed in the river area?
- - - Updated - - -
Why stop here?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kievan_Rus%27
Established in 880. Capital : Kyiv.
Agreed.
They say, Kiev is "the mother of Russian cities"
Therefore, Kiev is a Russian city.
Case closed.
Mic is dropped.
p.s. Kievan Rus was not a state, but an umbrella term for all the old Rus city-states and feudal states that Kievan Rus consisted of back at the day.

Moscow falls under the Kievan Rus maps, ergo, Moscow belongs to the current owners of Kyiv - Ukraine. Case closed. Russia exists because of ukrainian people.
p.s. "They say" is not a factual argument.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyiv
Who is right, wikipedia or a random MMO-C propaganda-poster?Under Varangian rule, the city became a capital of Kievan Rus', the first East Slavic state.
Last edited by Saradain; 2023-11-27 at 01:39 PM.
Come, take.
I'm sure okrainian people also dug up the Black sea, aswell.
They dug down a lot of jews during WW2, aswell, but lets put that aside.
Or the fact that okrainians willingly served in SS, Nachtigall, Dirlevanger, etc.
Or willingly served in Einzatszgruppen.
same can be said about okrainian "history textbooks"

Don't need to, am not ukrainian, nor does Ukraine wish to take Moscow, they simply want 1991 bordersHow did your special military operation of 3 days go vs Kyiv?
Ah yes, the good ol' "BUT BUT UKRAINIANS ARE NAZIS!!!". Did you forget already about what Russia did in just the past 1,5 years?
Also, you can check the referenced sources in Wikipedia, but that would be awfully inconvenient for you - you'd need to actually put effort to your arguments![]()
For good.
And Russia simply wants her borders secure, her people safe, with okraine being a direct threat.
Ask Mark Milley, the one who first said it.
As for me, I feel great, having escaped the horrors of okraine and rejoining Russia.
No "buts", they just plain are. Not all, but a hefty figure, especially westerners: Galizia, Lwow, and such.
Or you didn't know about the city of Kirvoi Rog celebrating SS vets as heroes each and evey year?
I don't remember no carpet bombings nor white phosphor being deployed.
They say it's a war, and/or a genocide, and I'm left puzzled: when will Russia commit to the actual war/genocide part?
So far, it doesn't look neither.
Funny that, I'm just reading the part about Bogdan Hmelnitskiy groveling at the feet of Russian Czar, begging for Lessr Russia to return to into t he folds of Russia the Great.
Great read, highly recommend![]()

Thanks for the reply! Your arguments basically are "no u", "I don't remember" vs actual facts like massacre of Bucha, and...a book recommendation when your original argument was about a time period that happened much later than founding of Kievan Rus. And seeing your post history in unrelated threads, I have a feeling you won't be posting for another set of few days soon(tm). Enjoy your holiday!
Easy come, easy go. Although you better start fighting for your Russia, "resident of Donbass", or will you flee like the rest of your true ilk?